BACKGROUND: Despite some insurance plans now paying for home-based palliative care, recent reports have suggested that insurance coverage for palliative care may be insufficient in expanding patient access to home-based palliative care. AIM: To identify patients' and caregivers' perceived barriers to home-based palliative care and their recommendations for overcoming these barriers. DESIGN: We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured individual interviews. Our interview protocol elicited participants' perspectives on home-based palliative care services; positive and negative aspects of the palliative program explanation; and suggestions for improving messaging around home-based palliative care. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five participants (patients, proxies, and their caregivers) who were eligible for a randomized controlled trial of home-based palliative care were interviewed by telephone. RESULTS: Themes related to home-based palliative care referral barriers included reluctance to have home visits, enrollment timing, lack of palliative care knowledge, misconceptions about palliative care, and patients' self-perceived health condition. Themes related to recommendations for overcoming these obstacles included ensuring that palliative care referrals come from healthcare providers or insurance companies and presenting palliative care services more clearly. CONCLUSION: Findings reinforce the need for additional palliative care education among patients with serious illness (and their caregivers) and the importance of delivering palliative care information and referrals from trusted sources.
BACKGROUND: Despite some insurance plans now paying for home-based palliative care, recent reports have suggested that insurance coverage for palliative care may be insufficient in expanding patient access to home-based palliative care. AIM: To identify patients' and caregivers' perceived barriers to home-based palliative care and their recommendations for overcoming these barriers. DESIGN: We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured individual interviews. Our interview protocol elicited participants' perspectives on home-based palliative care services; positive and negative aspects of the palliative program explanation; and suggestions for improving messaging around home-based palliative care. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five participants (patients, proxies, and their caregivers) who were eligible for a randomized controlled trial of home-based palliative care were interviewed by telephone. RESULTS: Themes related to home-based palliative care referral barriers included reluctance to have home visits, enrollment timing, lack of palliative care knowledge, misconceptions about palliative care, and patients' self-perceived health condition. Themes related to recommendations for overcoming these obstacles included ensuring that palliative care referrals come from healthcare providers or insurance companies and presenting palliative care services more clearly. CONCLUSION: Findings reinforce the need for additional palliative care education among patients with serious illness (and their caregivers) and the importance of delivering palliative care information and referrals from trusted sources.
Entities:
Keywords:
barriers to care; home care services; knowledge; palliative care; qualitative research; treatment refusal
Authors: Susan Enguidanos; Anna Rahman; Torrie Fields; Wendy Mack; Richard Brumley; Michael Rabow; Melissa Mert Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Ellen Hendriksen; Emma Williams; Nora Sporn; Joseph Greer; Alexandra DeGrange; Cheryl Koopman Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-10-03 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Rachel A Hadler; Brett R Curtis; Dara Z Ikejiani; David B Bekelman; Matthew Harinstein; Marie A Bakitas; Rachel Hess; Robert M Arnold; Dio Kavalieratos Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Richard Brumley; Susan Enguidanos; Paula Jamison; Rae Seitz; Nora Morgenstern; Sherry Saito; Jan McIlwane; Kristine Hillary; Jorge Gonzalez Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 5.562