PURPOSE: Palliative care consultation services are now available in the majority of cancer centers, yet most referrals to palliative care occur late. We previously found that the term "palliative care" was perceived by oncology professionals as a barrier to early patient referral. We aimed to determine whether a service name change to supportive care was associated with earlier referrals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records of 4,701 consecutive patients with a first palliative care consultation before (January 2006 to August 2007) and after (January 2008 to August 2009) the name change were analyzed, including demographics and dates of first registration to hospital, advanced cancer diagnosis, palliative care consultation, and death. One-sample proportions tests, median tests, χ(2) tests, and log-rank tests were used to identify group differences. RESULTS: The median age was 59 years, 50% were male, and 90% had solid tumors. After the name change, we found: (a) a 41% greater number of palliative care consultations (1,950 versus 2,751 patients; p < .001), mainly as a result of a rise in inpatient referrals (733 versus 1,451 patients; p < .001), and (b) in the outpatient setting, a shorter duration from hospital registration to palliative care consultation (median, 9.2 months versus 13.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; p < .001) and from advanced cancer diagnosis to palliative care consultation (5.2 months versus 6.9 months; HR, 0.82; p < .001), and a longer overall survival duration from palliative care consultation (median 6.2 months versus 4.7 months; HR, 1.21; p < .001). CONCLUSION: The name change to supportive care was associated with more inpatient referrals and earlier referrals in the outpatient setting. The outpatient setting facilitates earlier access to supportive/palliative care and should be established in more centers.
PURPOSE: Palliative care consultation services are now available in the majority of cancer centers, yet most referrals to palliative care occur late. We previously found that the term "palliative care" was perceived by oncology professionals as a barrier to early patient referral. We aimed to determine whether a service name change to supportive care was associated with earlier referrals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records of 4,701 consecutive patients with a first palliative care consultation before (January 2006 to August 2007) and after (January 2008 to August 2009) the name change were analyzed, including demographics and dates of first registration to hospital, advanced cancer diagnosis, palliative care consultation, and death. One-sample proportions tests, median tests, χ(2) tests, and log-rank tests were used to identify group differences. RESULTS: The median age was 59 years, 50% were male, and 90% had solid tumors. After the name change, we found: (a) a 41% greater number of palliative care consultations (1,950 versus 2,751 patients; p < .001), mainly as a result of a rise in inpatient referrals (733 versus 1,451 patients; p < .001), and (b) in the outpatient setting, a shorter duration from hospital registration to palliative care consultation (median, 9.2 months versus 13.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; p < .001) and from advanced cancer diagnosis to palliative care consultation (5.2 months versus 6.9 months; HR, 0.82; p < .001), and a longer overall survival duration from palliative care consultation (median 6.2 months versus 4.7 months; HR, 1.21; p < .001). CONCLUSION: The name change to supportive care was associated with more inpatient referrals and earlier referrals in the outpatient setting. The outpatient setting facilitates earlier access to supportive/palliative care and should be established in more centers.
Authors: Michael H Levy; Anthony Back; Costantino Benedetti; J Andrew Billings; Susan Block; Barry Boston; Eduardo Bruera; Sydney Dy; Catherine Eberle; Kathleen M Foley; Sloan Beth Karver; Sara J Knight; Sumathi Misra; Christine S Ritchie; David Spiegel; Linda Sutton; Susan Urba; Jamie H Von Roenn; Sharon M Weinstein Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Anne Walling; Karl A Lorenz; Sydney M Dy; Arash Naeim; Homayoon Sanati; Steven M Asch; Neil S Wenger Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-08-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David Hui; Ahmed Elsayem; Maxine De la Cruz; Ann Berger; Donna S Zhukovsky; Shana Palla; Avery Evans; Nada Fadul; J Lynn Palmer; Eduardo Bruera Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Frank D Ferris; Eduardo Bruera; Nathan Cherny; Charmaine Cummings; David Currow; Deborah Dudgeon; Nora Janjan; Florian Strasser; Charles F von Gunten; Jamie H Von Roenn Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-05-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Julie K Silver; Vishwa S Raj; Jack B Fu; Eric M Wisotzky; Sean Robinson Smith; Rebecca A Kirch Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Adam M Robin; Tobias Walbert; Tom Mikkelsen; Steven N Kalkanis; Jack Rock; Ian Lee; Mark L Rosenblum Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-07-16 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Anna Sorensen; Kirsten Wentlandt; Lisa W Le; Nadia Swami; Breffni Hannon; Gary Rodin; Monika K Krzyzanowska; Camilla Zimmermann Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-06-04 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Areej El-Jawahri; Thomas W LeBlanc; Linda J Burns; Ellen Denzen; Christa Meyer; Lih-Wen Mau; Eric J Roeland; William A Wood; Effie Petersdorf Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-10-05 Impact factor: 6.860