Literature DB >> 33895214

Translating complexity and heterogeneity of pancreatic tumor: 3D in vitro to in vivo models.

Marcel A Heinrich1, Ahmed M R H Mostafa1, Jennifer P Morton2, Lukas J A C Hawinkels3, Jai Prakash4.   

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an extremely aggressive type of cancer with an overall survival rate of less than 7-8%, emphasizing the need for novel effective therapeutics against PDAC. However only a fraction of therapeutics which seemed promising in the laboratory environment will eventually reach the clinic. One of the main reasons behind this low success rate is the complex tumor microenvironment (TME) of PDAC, a highly fibrotic and dense stroma surrounding tumor cells, which supports tumor progression as well as increases the resistance against the treatment. In particular, the growing understanding of the PDAC TME points out a different challenge in the development of efficient therapeutics - a lack of biologically relevant in vitro and in vivo models that resemble the complexity and heterogeneity of PDAC observed in patients. The purpose and scope of this review is to provide an overview of the recent developments in different in vitro and in vivo models, which aim to recapitulate the complexity of PDAC in a laboratory environment, as well to describe how 3D in vitro models can be integrated into drug development pipelines that are already including sophisticated in vivo models. Hereby a special focus will be given on the complexity of in vivo models and the challenges in vitro models face to reach the same levels of complexity in a controllable manner. First, a brief introduction of novel developments in two dimensional (2D) models and ex vivo models is provided. Next, recent developments in three dimensional (3D) in vitro models are described ranging from spheroids, organoids, scaffold models, bioprinted models to organ-on-chip models including a discussion on advantages and limitations for each model. Furthermore, we will provide a detailed overview on the current PDAC in vivo models including chemically-induced models, syngeneic and xenogeneic models, highlighting hetero- and orthotopic, patient-derived tissues (PDX) models, and genetically engineered mouse models. Finally, we will provide a discussion on overall limitations of both, in vitro and in vivo models, and discuss necessary steps to overcome these limitations to reach an efficient drug development pipeline, as well as discuss possibilities to include novel in silico models in the process.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioprinting; Genetically engineered mouse models; Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; Tumor microenvironment; Tumor-on-chip

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33895214     DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev        ISSN: 0169-409X            Impact factor:   15.470


  10 in total

Review 1.  3D-bioprinted cancer-on-a-chip: level-up organotypic in vitro models.

Authors:  Maria V Monteiro; Yu Shrike Zhang; Vítor M Gaspar; João F Mano
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 2.  Advancing Tumor Microenvironment Research by Combining Organs-on-Chips and Biosensors.

Authors:  Isabel Calejo; Marcel Alexander Heinrich; Giorgia Zambito; Laura Mezzanotte; Jai Prakash; Liliana Moreira Teixeira
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  A Mouse Model for Tuberculosis Combined With Inhalable Imiquimod-PLGA Nanocomposite Particles Based on Macrophage Phenotype.

Authors:  Teruki Nii; Shunsuke Takizawa; Tomomi Akita; Chikamasa Yamashita; Issei Takeuchi; Kimiko Makino
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 4.  RNA Drug Delivery Using Biogenic Nanovehicles for Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Nuannuan Li; Yiying Sun; Yuanlei Fu; Kaoxiang Sun
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 5.  Targeting Tumor-Stromal Interactions in Pancreatic Cancer: Impact of Collagens and Mechanical Traits.

Authors:  Parniyan Maneshi; James Mason; Mitesh Dongre; Daniel Öhlund
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-11-25

Review 6.  3D In Vivo Models for Translational Research on Pancreatic Cancer: The Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM) Model.

Authors:  Eric Pion; Julia Karnosky; Sofie Boscheck; Benedikt J Wagner; Katharina M Schmidt; Stefan M Brunner; Hans J Schlitt; Thiha Aung; Christina Hackl; Silke Haerteis
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 7.  Recent progresses in novel in vitro models of primary neurons: A biomaterial perspective.

Authors:  Jiangang Zhang; Huiyu Yang; Jiaming Wu; Dingyue Zhang; Yu Wang; Jiliang Zhai
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-17

Review 8.  Modeling Obesity-Driven Pancreatic Carcinogenesis-A Review of Current In Vivo and In Vitro Models of Obesity and Pancreatic Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Sally Kfoury; Patrick Michl; Laura Roth
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 7.666

9.  Microarchitectural mimicking of stroma-induced vasculature compression in pancreatic tumors using a 3D engineered model.

Authors:  Marcel Alexander Heinrich; Irene Uboldi; Praneeth Reddy Kuninty; Marc J K Ankone; Joop van Baarlen; Yu Shrike Zhang; Kartik Jain; Jai Prakash
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-09-24

Review 10.  PDAC as an Immune Evasive Disease: Can 3D Model Systems Aid to Tackle This Clinical Problem?

Authors:  Shruthi Narayanan; Silve Vicent; Mariano Ponz-Sarvisé
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-12-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.