Literature DB >> 33894581

Characterization of displacement forces and image artifacts in the presence of passive medical implants in low-field (<100 mT) permanent magnet-based MRI systems, and comparisons with clinical MRI systems.

C D E Van Speybroeck1, T O'Reilly1, W Teeuwisse1, P M Arnold2, A G Webb3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the displacement forces and image artifacts associated with passive medical implants for recently-developed low-field (<100 mT) MRI systems, and to compare these with values from higher field strengths used for clinical diagnosis.
METHODS: Setups were constructed to measure displacement forces in a permanent magnet-based Halbach array used for in vivo MRI at 50 mT, and results compared with measurements at 7 T. Image artifacts were assessed using turbo (fast) spin echo imaging sequences for four different passive medical implants: a septal occluder, iliac stent, pedicle screw and (ferromagnetic) endoscopic clip. Comparisons were made with artifacts produced at 1.5, 3 and 7 T. Finally, specific absorption rate (SAR) simulations were performed to determine under what operating conditions the limits might be approached at low-field.
RESULTS: Displacement forces at 50 mT on all but the ferromagnetic implant were between 1 and 10 mN. Image artifacts at 50 mT were much less than at clinical field strengths for all passive devices, and with the exception of the ferromagnetic clip. SAR simulations show that very long echo train (>128) turbo spin echo sequences can be run with short inter-pulse times (5-10 ms) within SAR limits.
CONCLUSIONS: This work presents the first evaluation of the effects of passive implants at field strengths less than 100 mT in terms of displacement forces, image artifacts and SAR. The results support previous claims that such systems can be used safely and usefully in challenging enviroments such as the intensive care unit.
Copyright © 2021 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Displacement forces; Image artifacts; Low-field MRI; MR safety; Passive implants

Year:  2021        PMID: 33894581     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  6 in total

1.  New-Generation Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Hip Arthroplasty Implants Using Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction: First In Vitro Experience at 0.55 T and Comparison With 1.5 T.

Authors:  Iman Khodarahmi; Inge M Brinkmann; Dana J Lin; Mary Bruno; Patricia M Johnson; Florian Knoll; Mahesh B Keerthivasan; Hersh Chandarana; Jan Fritz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 10.065

2.  Comparison of TGSE-BLADE DWI, RESOLVE DWI, and SS-EPI DWI in healthy volunteers and patients after cerebral aneurysm clipping.

Authors:  Sachi Okuchi; Yasutaka Fushimi; Kazumichi Yoshida; Satoshi Nakajima; Akihiko Sakata; Takuya Hinoda; Sayo Otani; Hajime Sagawa; Kun Zhou; Yukihiro Yamao; Masakazu Okawa; Yuji Nakamoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Selective excitation localized by the Bloch-Siegert shift and a B 1 + gradient.

Authors:  Jonathan B Martin; Sai Abitha Srinivas; Christopher E Vaughn; Heng Sun; Mark A Griswold; William A Grissom
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.737

4.  In vivo T1 and T2 relaxation time maps of brain tissue, skeletal muscle, and lipid measured in healthy volunteers at 50 mT.

Authors:  Thomas O'Reilly; Andrew G Webb
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 3.737

5.  A low-cost and shielding-free ultra-low-field brain MRI scanner.

Authors:  Yilong Liu; Alex T L Leong; Yujiao Zhao; Linfang Xiao; Henry K F Mak; Anderson Chun On Tsang; Gary K K Lau; Gilberto K K Leung; Ed X Wu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Portable magnetic resonance imaging of patients indoors, outdoors and at home.

Authors:  Teresa Guallart-Naval; José M Algarín; Rubén Pellicer-Guridi; Fernando Galve; Yolanda Vives-Gilabert; Rubén Bosch; Eduardo Pallás; José M González; Juan P Rigla; Pablo Martínez; Francisco J Lloris; Jose Borreguero; Álvaro Marcos-Perucho; Vlad Negnevitsky; Luis Martí-Bonmatí; Alfonso Ríos; José M Benlloch; Joseba Alonso
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.