Literature DB >> 33894061

Targeted Use of Placebo Effects Decreases Experimental Itch in Atopic Dermatitis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ariane Sölle1, Margitta Worm2, Fabrizio Benedetti3,4, Theresa Sabine Bartholomäus2, Lena Schwender-Groen1, Regine Klinger1.   

Abstract

Evidence from pain research shows that the effectiveness of active pharmacological treatments can be enhanced by placebo effects. The "open drug administration" is superior to "hidden drug administration.​" In a randomized controlled trial, we aimed to show that the targeted use of placebo effects increases the efficacy of an antihistamine (dimetindene) infusion in participants with atopic dermatitis. We openly infused dimetindene (drug) in full sight with information (intervention group 1: OPEN-DRUG+INST), openly infused drug with an additional classical conditioning learning experience (intervention group 2: OPEN-DRUG+INST+COND) or infused drug without any information or sight (i.e., hidden administration (control group 1: HIDDEN-DRUG)). Control group 2 received a placebo infusion (saline) declared as dimetindene and also experienced the conditioning experience (PLAC+INST+COND). Itch was experimentally induced with histamine via a skin prick test. Outcome was assessed at the subjective (primary end point: experimental itch intensity, numeric rating scale), and objective level (secondary end point: wheal size, mm2 ). Experimental-induced itch intensity decreased in all groups but at different rates (P < 0.001). The groups with the open administration, whether it was dimetindene or placebo, had significantly stronger reductions in itch compared to the HIDDEN-DRUG group (OPEN-DRUG+INST+COND: P < 0.001; OPEN-DRUG+INST: P = 0.009; and PLAC+INST+COND: P < 0.001). Additional drug conditioning mediated via expectation led to a stronger reduction of itching (P = 0.001). Results on wheal size were similar (P = 0.048), however, no significant difference between the HIDDEN-DRUG group and the PLAC+INST+COND group (P = 0.967) was found. We conclude that specifically generated targeted placebo effects can significantly increase the action of a drug (dimetindene) and should be used in clinical practice.
© 2021 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33894061     DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  5 in total

Review 1.  [The effect of treatment expectations on pruritus and skin pain].

Authors:  F Krefting; S Hölsken; M Schedlowski; W Sondermann
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 1.629

Review 2.  [Systemic inflammation, "sickness behavior" and expectations : What role do expectations play in inflammation-associated symptoms?]

Authors:  Justine Schmidt; Johanna Reinold; Regine Klinger; Sven Benson
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 1.629

Review 3.  [Seeing others is believing-analgesic placebo effects through observational learning?]

Authors:  Marie Schwartz; J Stuhlreyer; R Klinger
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 1.629

4.  Observing treatment outcomes in other patients can elicit augmented placebo effects on pain treatment: a double-blinded randomized clinical trial with patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Marie Schwartz; Laura-Marie Fischer; Corinna Bläute; Jan Stork; Luana Colloca; Christian Zöllner; Regine Klinger
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 7.926

Review 5.  Placebo: a brief updated review.

Authors:  Alfredo Jose Pardo-Cabello; Victoria Manzano-Gamero; Emilio Puche-Cañas
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 3.195

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.