Literature DB >> 33892347

Attending to the Attentional Control Scale for Children: Confirming its factor structure and measurement invariance.

Dana van Son1, Carla E Marin1, Panagiotis Boutris2, Yasmin Rey2, Eli R Lebowitz1, Jeremy W Pettit2, Wendy K Silverman3.   

Abstract

The Attentional Control Scale for Children (ACS-C) is a widely used self-report questionnaire that measures attentional control in youth. Previous research examined factor-structure and validation of the ACS-C and yielded a 2-factor structure with Attentional Focusing and Attentional Shifting subscales. This study used a confirmatory factor analysis in a large, ethnically diverse sample of clinic-referred anxious youth (N = 442, ages 7-16 years) to compare model fit of three models, the original two-factor model of the ACS-C, a two-factor model of a modified ACS-C (two items re-assigned from Attentional Focusing to Attentional Shifting, three items removed from Attentional Focusing, and two items removed from Attentional Shifting), and a single-factor model. Results reveal best model fit for the two-factor modified ACS-C. This model had strong factorial invariance across sex, partial invariance across ethnicity, and was variant across age. Also, total and subscale scores for the two-factor modified ACS-C correlated with anxiety and depression symptom scale scores, supporting its concurrent validity. Findings confirm the two-factor structure of the modified ACS-C. Future research implications relating to attentional control in children are discussed.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anxious youth; Attentional control; Confirmatory factor analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33892347      PMCID: PMC8141040          DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anxiety Disord        ISSN: 0887-6185


  39 in total

1.  The self regulatory effect of attentional control in modulating the relationship between attentional biases toward threat and anxiety symptoms in children.

Authors:  Georgiana Susa; Irina Pitică; Oana Benga; Mircea Miclea
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2012-03-12

2.  Early and late dot-probe attentional bias to mild and high threat pictures: Relations with EEG theta/beta ratio, self-reported trait attentional control, and trait anxiety.

Authors:  Dana van Son; Angelos Angelidis; Muriel A Hagenaars; Willem van der Does; Peter Putman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Children's Depression Inventory: construct and discriminant validity across clinical and nonreferred (control) populations.

Authors:  M P Carey; M E Faulstich; F M Gresham; L Ruggiero; P Enyart
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1987-10

4.  Attention bias modification for major depressive disorder: Effects on attention bias, resting state connectivity, and symptom change.

Authors:  Christopher G Beevers; Peter C Clasen; Philip M Enock; David M Schnyer
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2015-08

5.  Editorial: Attention to Threat in Child Anxiety: Gazing Into the Future While Keeping Sight of the Past.

Authors:  Jeremy W Pettit; Wendy K Silverman
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 8.829

6.  Attention control in middle childhood: relations to psychopathological symptoms and threat perception distortions.

Authors:  Peter Muris; Cor Meesters; Linda Rompelberg
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2006-09-20

7.  Normative and reliability data for the Children's Depression Inventory.

Authors:  M R Smucker; W E Craighead; L W Craighead; B J Green
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1986-03

Review 8.  Temperament, anxiety, and the processing of threat-relevant stimuli.

Authors:  Christopher J Lonigan; Michael W Vasey; Beth M Phillips; Rebecca A Hazen
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2004-03

Review 9.  The role of temperament in the etiology of child psychopathology.

Authors:  Peter Muris; Thomas H Ollendick
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-12

10.  Ineffectiveness of reverse wording of questionnaire items: let's learn from cows in the rain.

Authors:  Eric van Sonderen; Robbert Sanderman; James C Coyne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.