BACKGROUND: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a significant public health concern for women with breast implants. The increase in incidence rates underscores the need for improved methods for risk reduction and risk management. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review to assess surgical risk reduction techniques and analyze communication/informed consent practices in patients with textured implants. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in PubMed (legacy), Embase (Embase.com), and Scopus with four search strategies including key terms centered around breast reconstruction and BIA-ALCL. RESULTS: A total of 571 articles were identified, of which 276 were included in the final review after duplicates were removed. After review, no articles were determined to fit the inclusion criteria of demonstrating data-driven evidence of BIA-ALCL risk reduction through surgical measures, demonstrating a significant lack of data on risk reduction for BIA-ALCL. CONCLUSIONS: Risk management for BIA-ALCL is an evolving area requiring additional investigation. Although removal of textured devices in asymptomatic patients is not currently recommended by the Food and Drug Administration, variability in estimates of risk has led many patients to electively replace these implants in an effort to decrease their risk of developing BIA-ALCL. To date, however, there is no evidence supporting the concept that replacing textured implants with smooth implants reduces risk for this disease. This information should be used to aid in the informed consent process for patients presenting to discuss management of textured breast implants.
BACKGROUND: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a significant public health concern for women with breast implants. The increase in incidence rates underscores the need for improved methods for risk reduction and risk management. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review to assess surgical risk reduction techniques and analyze communication/informed consent practices in patients with textured implants. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in PubMed (legacy), Embase (Embase.com), and Scopus with four search strategies including key terms centered around breast reconstruction and BIA-ALCL. RESULTS: A total of 571 articles were identified, of which 276 were included in the final review after duplicates were removed. After review, no articles were determined to fit the inclusion criteria of demonstrating data-driven evidence of BIA-ALCL risk reduction through surgical measures, demonstrating a significant lack of data on risk reduction for BIA-ALCL. CONCLUSIONS: Risk management for BIA-ALCL is an evolving area requiring additional investigation. Although removal of textured devices in asymptomatic patients is not currently recommended by the Food and Drug Administration, variability in estimates of risk has led many patients to electively replace these implants in an effort to decrease their risk of developing BIA-ALCL. To date, however, there is no evidence supporting the concept that replacing textured implants with smooth implants reduces risk for this disease. This information should be used to aid in the informed consent process for patients presenting to discuss management of textured breast implants.
Authors: Erin L Doren; Roberto N Miranda; Jesse C Selber; Patrick B Garvey; Jun Liu; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Charles E Butler; Mark W Clemens Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: David J Collett; Hinne Rakhorst; Peter Lennox; Mark Magnusson; Rodney Cooter; Anand K Deva Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: John M Roberts; Logan W Carr; Allison Jones; Amber Schilling; Donald R Mackay; John D Potochny Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Garry S Brody; Dennis Deapen; Clive R Taylor; Lauren Pinter-Brown; Sarah Rose House-Lightner; James S Andersen; Grant Carlson; Melissa G Lechner; Alan L Epstein Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Ashley N Leberfinger; Brittany J Behar; Nicole C Williams; Kevin L Rakszawski; John D Potochny; Donald R Mackay; Dino J Ravnic Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Nina Ditsch; Achim Wöcke; Michael Untch; Christian Jackisch; Ute-Susann Albert; Maggie Banys-Paluchowski; Ingo Bauerfeind; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Wilfried Budach; Peter Dall; Eva Maria Fallenberg; Peter A Fasching; Tanja N Fehm; Michael Friedrich; Bernd Gerber; Oleg Gluz; Nadia Harbeck; Jörg Heil; Jens Huober; Hans H Kreipe; David Krug; Thorsten Kühn; Sherko Kümmel; Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke; Sibylle Loibl; Diana Lüftner; Michael Patrick Lux; Nicolai Maass; Christoph Mundhenke; Ulrike Nitz; Tjoung-Won Park-Simon; Toralf Reimer; Kerstin Rhiem; Achim Rody; Marcus Schmidt; Andreas Schneeweiss; Florian Schütz; Hans-Peter Sinn; Christine Solbach; Erich-Franz Solomayer; Elmar Stickeler; Christoph Thomssen; Isabell Witzel; Volkmar Müller; Wolfgang Janni; Marc Thill Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2022-05-05 Impact factor: 2.268