Literature DB >> 33888398

Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes Among Deaf and Hard of Hearing Women: Results From Nationally Representative Data.

Monika Mitra1, Michael M McKee2, Ilhom Akobirshoev3, Grant A Ritter4, Anne M Valentine3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the literature suggests that women with disabilities are at increased risk for pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes, there are few population-based studies of pregnancy outcomes among deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) women in the United States.
OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy complications and neonatal outcomes between deliveries to DHH and non-DHH women using national hospitalization discharge record data. STUDY
DESIGN: We used the 2007-2016 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample to compare pregnancy complications and outcomes among deliveries to DHH women with deliveries to non-DHH women using bivariate and Poisson regressions, controlling for sociodemographic, hospital, and clinical characteristics.
RESULTS: DHH women had an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and chronic medical conditions, including preexisting diabetes (relative risk [RR], 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.68-2.42; p < .001), gestational diabetes (RR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.19-1.44; p < .001), chronic hypertension (RR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.33-1.72; p < .001), preeclampsia and eclampsia (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.21-1.51; p < .01), placenta previa (RR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.22-2.16; p < .01), placental abruption (RR, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.78; p < .01), labor induction (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.27; p < .01), chorioamnionitis (RR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.22-1.69; p < .001), cesarean delivery (RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04-1.14; p < .001), premature rupture of membranes (RR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.20-1.50; p < .001), antepartum hemorrhage (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.13-1.64; p < .001), and postpartum hemorrhage (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.13-1.49; p < .001). After adjustment for socioeconomic and hospital characteristics, the risk for gestational diabetes, preeclampsia and eclampsia, placenta previa, and chorioamnionitis remained unexplained.
CONCLUSIONS: DHH women are at increased risk for adverse pregnancy, fetal, and neonatal outcomes, illuminating the need for awareness among obstetric and primary care providers as well as the need for systematic investigation of outcomes and evidence-based guidelines.
Copyright © 2021 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33888398      PMCID: PMC8448895          DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2021.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Issues        ISSN: 1049-3867


  65 in total

1.  Auditory status and experiences of abuse among college students.

Authors:  Judy L Porter; Laverne McQuiller Williams
Journal:  Violence Vict       Date:  2011

2.  Birth outcomes among US women with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Ilhom Akobirshoev; Susan L Parish; Monika Mitra; Eliana Rosenthal
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.554

3.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  The Cry of the Child and its Relationship to Hearing Loss in Parental Guardians and Health Care Providers.

Authors:  Lindsay E Calderon; Logan D Carney; Kevin T Kavanagh
Journal:  J Evid Inf Soc Work       Date:  2015-04-06

5.  Pregnancy Characteristics and Outcomes among Women at Risk for Disability from Health Conditions Identified in Medical Claims.

Authors:  Karen M Clements; Monika Mitra; Jianying Zhang; Lisa I Iezzoni
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2016-07-28

6.  Mortality and Morbidity During Delivery Hospitalization Among Pregnant Women With Epilepsy in the United States.

Authors:  Sarah C MacDonald; Brian T Bateman; Thomas F McElrath; Sonia Hernández-Díaz
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 18.302

7.  Prevalence of adherence to treatment in homebound elderly people in primary health care: a descriptive, cross-sectional, multicentre study.

Authors:  Juan Cárdenas-Valladolid; Carmen Martín-Madrazo; Miguel A Salinero-Fort; Enrique Carrillo de-Santa Pau; Juan C Abánades-Herranz; Carmen de Burgos-Lunar
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Emergency Department utilization among Deaf American Sign Language users.

Authors:  Michael M McKee; Paul C Winters; Ananda Sen; Philip Zazove; Kevin Fiscella
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 2.554

9.  Hearing impairment: significant but underassessed in primary care settings.

Authors:  Margaret I Wallhagen; Elaine Pettengill
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.254

Review 10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of intimate partner violence during pregnancy and selected birth outcomes.

Authors:  Amber Hill; Christina Pallitto; Jennifer McCleary-Sills; Claudia Garcia-Moreno
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.561

View more
  1 in total

1.  Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Perinatal Outcomes of Placental Abruption-Detailed Annual Data and Clinical Perspectives from Polish Tertiary Center.

Authors:  Monika Bączkowska; Katarzyna Kosińska-Kaczyńska; Magdalena Zgliczyńska; Robert Brawura-Biskupski-Samaha; Beata Rebizant; Michał Ciebiera
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.