Literature DB >> 28736057

Regional variation in breast cancer surgery: Results from the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

Alexander S Chiu1, Princess Thomas2, Brigid K Killelea2, Nina Horowitz2, Anees B Chagpar2, Donald R Lannin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early studies have shown significant regional differences in the utilization of breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy with reconstruction. It is expected that with the passage of time and the adoption of national treatment guidelines, these disparities would disappear.
METHODS: Patients with non-metastatic breast cancer who underwent surgery between 2004 and 2013 were analyzed using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Trends in BCT and reconstruction were evaluated and multivariate logistic regression performed.
RESULTS: The highest rate of BCT was in New England (69%) and the lowest in East South Central (49%), p < 0.001. The rate of reconstruction was highest in the Middle Atlantic (44%) and the lowest in East South Central (26%), p < 0.001. Compared to East South Central, the odds ratio (OR) for BCT in New England was 2.2 (95% CI 2.1-2.3), and the OR for reconstruction in Middle Atlantic was 1.7 (95% CI 1.6-1.8).
CONCLUSION: There continue to be significant regional differences in breast surgery.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast reconstruction; Breast-conserving surgery; Regional differences

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28736057     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  7 in total

1.  Sociodemographic disparities in molecular testing for breast cancer.

Authors:  Whitney E Zahnd; Radhika Ranganathan; Swann Arp Adams; Oluwole A Babatunde
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Association of Medicaid Expansion with Post-mastectomy Reconstruction Rates.

Authors:  Justin Le Blanc; Mehra Golshan; Donald Lannin; Rachel Greenup; Elizabeth R Berger; Angeleke Saridakis; Nina Horowitz; Gregory Zanieski; Tomer Avraham; Melissa Mastrioanni; Tristen Park
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Development of a prediction model based on LASSO regression to evaluate the risk of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in Chinese breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes.

Authors:  Lei Meng; Ting Zheng; Yuanyuan Wang; Zhao Li; Qi Xiao; Junfeng He; Jinxiang Tan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Racial Disparity in Immediate Breast Reconstruction; a Gap That is not Closing.

Authors:  Mahdi Malekpour; Sean Devitt; Joseph DeSantis; Christian Kauffman
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 0.558

5.  Postmastectomy breast reconstruction in women aged 70 and older: An analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

Authors:  Chandler S Cortina; Carmen R Bergom; Julie Kijack; Abigail A Thorgerson; Chiang-Ching Spencer Huang; Amanda L Kong
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 4.348

6.  A novel nomogram for decision-making assistance on exemption of axillary lymph node dissection in T1-2 breast cancer with only one sentinel lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Lei Liu; Yaoxin Lin; Guozheng Li; Lei Zhang; Xin Zhang; Jiale Wu; Xinheng Wang; Yumei Yang; Shouping Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Breast-Contour-Preserving Procedure as a Multidisciplinary Parameter of Esthetic Outcome in Breast Cancer Treatment in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Annnelotte van Bommel; Pauline Spronk; Marc Mureau; Sabine Siesling; Carolien Smorenburg; Rob Tollenaar; Marie-Jeanne Vrancken Peeters; Thijs van Dalen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 5.344

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.