Literature DB >> 33885991

Mask-Guided Convolutional Neural Network for Breast Tumor Prognostic Outcome Prediction on 3D DCE-MR Images.

Gengbo Liu1, Debasis Mitra2, Ella F Jones3, Benjamin L Franc3, Spencer C Behr3, Alex Nguyen3, Marjan S Bolouri3, Dorota J Wisner3, Bonnie N Joe3, Laura J Esserman4, Nola M Hylton3, Youngho Seo3.   

Abstract

In this proof-of-concept work, we have developed a 3D-CNN architecture that is guided by the tumor mask for classifying several patient-outcomes in breast cancer from the respective 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) images. The tumor masks on DCE-MRI images were generated using pre- and post-contrast images and validated by experienced radiologists. We show that our proposed mask-guided classification has a higher accuracy than that from either the full image without tumor masks (including background) or the masked voxels only. We have used two patient outcomes for this study: (1) recurrence of cancer after 5 years of imaging and (2) HER2 status, for comparing accuracies of different models. By looking at the activation maps, we conclude that an image-based prediction model using 3D-CNN could be improved by even a conservatively generated mask, rather than overly trusting an unguided, blind 3D-CNN. A blind CNN may classify accurately enough, while its attention may really be focused on a remote region within 3D images. On the other hand, only using a conservatively segmented region may not be as good for classification as using full images but forcing the model's attention toward the known regions of interest.
© 2021. Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer outcome classification; DCE-MRI; Deep learning; Mask-guided convolutional neural net

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33885991      PMCID: PMC8329098          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-021-00449-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.903


  11 in total

1.  Breast cancer statistics, 2015: Convergence of incidence rates between black and white women.

Authors:  Carol E DeSantis; Stacey A Fedewa; Ann Goding Sauer; Joan L Kramer; Robert A Smith; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  E Warner; D B Plewes; R S Shumak; G C Catzavelos; L S Di Prospero; M J Yaffe; V Goel; E Ramsay; P L Chart; D E Cole; G A Taylor; M Cutrara; T H Samuels; J P Murphy; J M Murphy; S A Narod
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Triple-negative and non-triple-negative invasive breast cancer: association between MR and fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging.

Authors:  Marjan S Bolouri; Sjoerd G Elias; Dorota J Wisner; Spencer C Behr; Randall A Hawkins; Sachiko A Suzuki; Krysta S Banfield; Bonnie N Joe; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Quantitative analysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI.

Authors:  Ke Nie; Jeon-Hor Chen; Hon J Yu; Yong Chu; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  A Deep Learning Model to Predict a Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease by Using 18F-FDG PET of the Brain.

Authors:  Yiming Ding; Jae Ho Sohn; Michael G Kawczynski; Hari Trivedi; Roy Harnish; Nathaniel W Jenkins; Dmytro Lituiev; Timothy P Copeland; Mariam S Aboian; Carina Mari Aparici; Spencer C Behr; Robert R Flavell; Shih-Ying Huang; Kelly A Zalocusky; Lorenzo Nardo; Youngho Seo; Randall A Hawkins; Miguel Hernandez Pampaloni; Dexter Hadley; Benjamin L Franc
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 29.146

6.  Exploration of PET and MRI radiomic features for decoding breast cancer phenotypes and prognosis.

Authors:  Shih-Ying Huang; Benjamin L Franc; Roy J Harnish; Gengbo Liu; Debasis Mitra; Timothy P Copeland; Vignesh A Arasu; John Kornak; Ella F Jones; Spencer C Behr; Nola M Hylton; Elissa R Price; Laura Esserman; Youngho Seo
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-08-16

7.  The Potential Use of DCE-MRI Texture Analysis to Predict HER2 2+ Status.

Authors:  Zejun Jiang; Lirong Song; Hecheng Lu; Jiandong Yin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Imaging intratumor heterogeneity: role in therapy response, resistance, and clinical outcome.

Authors:  James P B O'Connor; Chris J Rose; John C Waterton; Richard A D Carano; Geoff J M Parker; Alan Jackson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  MRI enhancement in stromal tissue surrounding breast tumors: association with recurrence free survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ella F Jones; Sumedha P Sinha; David C Newitt; Catherine Klifa; John Kornak; Catherine C Park; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Image analysis with deep learning to predict breast cancer grade, ER status, histologic subtype, and intrinsic subtype.

Authors:  Heather D Couture; Lindsay A Williams; Joseph Geradts; Sarah J Nyante; Ebonee N Butler; J S Marron; Charles M Perou; Melissa A Troester; Marc Niethammer
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-09-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.