Literature DB >> 33885346

Videoconferencing Etiquette: Promoting Gender Equity During Virtual Meetings.

Natasha Dhawan1, Molly Carnes2, Angela Byars-Winston3, Narjust Duma4.   

Abstract

Considerable evidence has demonstrated that gender influences interactions during in-person meetings, most commonly, negatively impacting women and persons of color. Pervasive gender stereotypes about roles that were (and are) occupied by men and women lead to implicit assumptions about competency in said roles. For example, women may receive more negative verbal interruptions or nonverbal cues that undermine their authority as a leader, a stereotypically male-typed role. The coronavirus pandemic has led to the rapid rise in videoconferencing in professional interactions; however, little is known about videoconferencing etiquette and how gender bias permeates to this new setting. Although there are many benefits to the use of this technology, it has the potential to reinforce gender bias rooted in cultural and societal norms, gender stereotypes, and traditional gender roles. The well-documented implicit biases that have been shown to favor men over women during in-person meetings may translate to further gender gaps in leadership during virtual meetings. It is also possible that videoconferencing could be used to reduce gender bias, but until we have research to shine a light on this topic, this article provides 10 tips for promoting gender equity during virtual meetings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gender bias; gender equity; implicit bias; mixed-gender communication; videoconferencing; virtual meetings

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33885346      PMCID: PMC8064948          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  18 in total

1.  Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups.

Authors:  Anita Williams Woolley; Christopher F Chabris; Alex Pentland; Nada Hashmi; Thomas W Malone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Interventions that affect gender bias in hiring: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carol Isaac; Barbara Lee; Molly Carnes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Does stereotype threat affect women in academic medicine?

Authors:  Diana Jill Burgess; Anne Joseph; Michelle van Ryn; Molly Carnes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Comparison of Hospital Mortality and Readmission Rates for Medicare Patients Treated by Male vs Female Physicians.

Authors:  Yusuke Tsugawa; Anupam B Jena; Jose F Figueroa; E John Orav; Daniel M Blumenthal; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Are women really more talkative than men?

Authors:  Matthias R Mehl; Simine Vazire; Nairán Ramírez-Esparza; Richard B Slatcher; James W Pennebaker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A "ton of feathers": gender discrimination in academic medical careers and how to manage it.

Authors:  Phyllis L Carr; Laura Szalacha; Rosalind Barnett; Cheryl Caswell; Thomas Inui
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Gender differences in time spent on parenting and domestic responsibilities by high-achieving young physician-researchers.

Authors:  Shruti Jolly; Kent A Griffith; Rochelle DeCastro; Abigail Stewart; Peter Ubel; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Gender Stereotypes.

Authors:  Naomi Ellemers
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 24.137

9.  Cosmetics as a feature of the extended human phenotype: modulation of the perception of biologically important facial signals.

Authors:  Nancy L Etcoff; Shannon Stock; Lauren E Haley; Sarah A Vickery; David M House
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison of postoperative outcomes among patients treated by male and female surgeons: a population based matched cohort study.

Authors:  Christopher Jd Wallis; Bheeshma Ravi; Natalie Coburn; Robert K Nam; Allan S Detsky; Raj Satkunasivam
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-10-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.