| Literature DB >> 33884261 |
Ernest Ekow Abano1, Joshua Akanson1, Nazir Kizzie-Hayford2.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to provide the optimum drying conditions to produce high-quality dried tiger nuts using hot-air drying. For this, we evaluated the effect of the whole, halved, and pulverized tiger nuts and air temperature (50 to 70°C) on the drying kinetics and quality of tiger nuts. The drying process generally followed a constant rate in the first 3 hours and a falling regime. We found the optimum drying conditions for tiger nuts to be crushed before convective hot-air drying at a temperature of 70°C. At this optimum condition, the predicted drying time, vitamin C content, reducing sugars, browning, brightness, redness, and yellowness was 780 min, 22.9 mg/100 mg dry weight, 157.01 mg/100 g dry weight, 0.21 Abs unit, 56.97, 1.6, and 17.0, respectively. The tiger nut's reducing sugars increased from the 130.8 mg/100 dry weight in the raw tiger nuts to between 133.11 and 158.18 mg/100 dry weight after drying. The vitamin C degradation rate was highest in the uncut tiger nuts (32-35%) while in the halved and the pulverized samples, it was between 12 and 17%. The crushed samples' effective moisture removal increased between 5.6- and 6.75-fold at the different air temperatures than that of the intact tiger nuts. The activation energy was 18.17 kJ/mol for the unbroken, 14.78 kJ/mol for the halved, and 26.61 kJ/mol for the pulverized tiger nut samples. The model MR = 0.997 exp(-0.02t 1.266) + 0.0000056t was the most suitable thin-layer drying model among the models examined for convective hot-air drying of tiger nuts. It is advisable to crush tiger nut before hot-air drying to produce better-quality flour for making milk beverages, cakes, biscuits, bread, porridge, and tiger nut-based breakfast cereals.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33884261 PMCID: PMC8041527 DOI: 10.1155/2021/8870001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Food Sci ISSN: 2314-5765
Mathematical models that were applied to drying data.
| Model name | Model expression | References |
|---|---|---|
| Page | MR = exp(− | [ |
| Logarithmic | MR = | [ |
| Midilli et al. | MR = | [ |
Figure 1Effect of tiger nut state and air temperature on the drying characteristic curves and drying rates for the different drying conditions.
Figure 2Variation of In(MR) against drying time and the effective moisture diffusivity (Deff) for tiger nuts dried at the various conditions.
Figure 3Variation of In(Deff) against 1/(T + 273.15) for the whole, halved, and pulverized tiger nuts.
Results of fitting the experimental data for tiger nuts and their estimated constants for the various air temperatures.
| Model name |
| State |
|
|
|
|
| RMSE |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Page | 70 | Whole | 0.005 | 0.972 | 0.998 | 0.012247 | 0.000167 | ||
| Halved | 0.007 | 0.922 | 0.998 | 0.012247 | 0.000167 | ||||
| Pulverized | 0.012 | 1.234 | 0.999 | 0.01 | 0.000111 | ||||
| 60 | Whole | 0.002 | 1.113 | 0.998 | 0.014142 | 0.000222 | |||
| Halved | 0.009 | 0.85 | 0.997 | 0.014142 | 0.000222 | ||||
| Pulverized | 0.011 | 1.011 | 0.01 | 0.000111 | |||||
| 50 | Whole | 0.002 | 1.077 | 0.993 | 0.02582 | 0.000737 | |||
| Halved | 0.005 | 0.922 | 0.992 | 0.026726 | 0.000789 | ||||
| Pulverized | 0.010 | 1.05 | 0.996 | 0.019518 | 0.000421 | ||||
|
| |||||||||
| Midilli et al. | 70 | Whole | 1.014 | 0.007 | 0.903 | −3.79 | 0.999 | 0.01 | 0.000125 |
| Halved | 1.006 | 0.009 | 0.865 | −3.62 | 0.999 | 0.007071 | 6.25 | ||
| Pulverized | 0.997 | 0.02 | 1.266 | 5.60 | 0.999 | 0.01 | 0.000125 | ||
| 60 | Whole | 0.984 | 0.006 | 1.094 | −3.48 | 0.999 | 0.01 | 0.000125 | |
| Halved | 1.008 | 0.007 | 0.774 | −5.71 | 0.998 | 0.01 | 0.000125 | ||
| Pulverized | 0.986 | 0.015 | 1.037 | 2.83 | 0.999 | 0.01 | 0.000125 | ||
| 50 | Whole | 0.999 | 0.005 | 0.855 | 0.00 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Halved | 0.997 | 0.0057 | 0.736 | 0.00 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Pulverized | 0.993 | 0.014 | 0.946 | −8.13 | 0.999 | 0.006901 | 5.88E-05 | ||
|
| |||||||||
| Logarithmic | 70 | Whole | 0.996 | 0.004 | -0.004 | 0.998 | 0.014142 | 0.000235 | |
| Halved | 0.97 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.997 | 0.014142 | 0.000235 | |||
| 60 | Pulverized | 1.062 | 0.007 | -0.012 | 0.994 | 0.024495 | 0.000706 | ||
| Whole | 1.086 | 0.003 | -0.087 | 0.999 | 0.012247 | 0.000176 | |||
| Halved | 0.926 | 0.004 | 0.029 | 0.994 | 0.022361 | 0.000588 | |||
| Pulverized | 0.999 | 0.005 | -0.005 | 0.999 | 0.01 | 0.000118 | |||
| 50 | Whole | 1.154 | 0.002 | -0.184 | 0.999 | 0.009759 | 0.000111 | ||
| Halved | 0.992 | 0.003 | -0.057 | 0.995 | 0.020702 | 0.0005 | |||
| Pulverized | 1.052 | 0.005 | -0.074 | 0.999 | 0.009759 | 0.000111 | |||
Figure 4Drying rate constant (k) for the Midilli et al. model for the tiger nuts dried at the various conditions.
Drying conditions and results of drying time, moisture content, reducing sugars, vitamin c browning index, colour parameters, and effective moisture diffusivity for dried tiger nuts.
| State of tiger nut |
| DT (min) | MC (% d.b) | RS (mg/100 g) | Vit C (mg/100 g) | BI (Abs unit) |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Halved | 60 | 960 | 10.26 | 125.79 | 23.58 | 0.19 | 56.97 | 2.37 | 19.92 | 6.40 |
| Halved | 50 | 1080 | 16.02 | 154.89 | 24.09 | 0.21 | 50.81 | 2.93 | 18.86 | 6.77 |
| Whole | 70 | 960 | 8.38 | 133.11 | 17.93 | 0.18 | 53.12 | 3.66 | 19.57 | 8.42 |
| Pulverized | 70 | 780 | 0.84 | 157.01 | 22.9 | 0.21 | 53.9 | 1.6 | 17 | 41.59 |
| Whole | 50 | 1080 | 20.4 | 148.61 | 18.62 | 0.21 | 52.51 | 1.53 | 20.33 | 5.67 |
| Halved | 70 | 900 | 6.71 | 158.18 | 22.96 | 0.19 | 52.07 | 2.85 | 18.53 | 9.33 |
| Pulverized | 50 | 1080 | 4.53 | 142.6 | 23.08 | 0.24 | 55.53 | 4.16 | 19.81 | 31.88 |
| Pulverized | 60 | 960 | 1.49 | 136.24 | 22.78 | 0.25 | 53.9 | 1.6 | 17 | 36.0 |
| Whole | 60 | 960 | 13.25 | 140.12 | 18.43 | 0.22 | 52.51 | 2.42 | 19.1 | 6.00 |
T: air temperature; DT: drying time; MC: moisture content; RS: reducing sugars; Vit C: vitamin C; BI: nonenzymatic browning index; L∗: whiteness; a∗: redness; b∗: yellowness; Deff: effective moisture diffusivity.
Figure 5Effect of drying conditions on tiger nut quality.
Model and factor contribution to responses and their significance.
| Parameter | Factor contribution (%) with | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | Temperature | State of tiger nut | State∗ temperature | |
| DT (min) | 85.57 (0.006) | 78.35 (0.024) | 7.22 (0.444) | 14.43 (0.45) |
| MC (% dry basis) | 94.80 (0.008) | 30.79 (0.021) | 64.01 (0.006) | 5.20 (0.06) |
| BI (Abs unit) | 57.49 (0.024) | 2.05 (0.655) | 13.39 (0.086) | 42.10 (0.011) |
| Ascorbic acid (Vit C) (mg/100 g) | 97.95 (<0.0001) | 7.26 (<0.0001) | 65.33 (<0.0001) | 25.36 (<0.0001) |
| Reducing sugars (mg/100 g) | 99.21 (<0.0001) | 34.25 (<0.0001) | 41.09 (<0.0001) | 23.86 (<0.0001) |
|
| 30.63 (0.4730) | 4.84 (0.545) | 3.29 (0.659) | 22.50 (0.256) |
|
| 79.07 (<0.0001) | 7.49 (0.064) | 0.75 (0.727) | 70.83 (<0.0001) |
|
| 39.93 (0.227) | 17.76 (0.097) | 12.86 (0.175) | 9.31 (0.604) |
|
| 93.13 (0.002) | 6.57 (0.261) | 86.56 (0.002) | 6.87 (0.563) |