Yong-Jin Park1, Dongmin Choi, Joon Young Choi, Seung Hyup Hyun. 1. From the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul Department of Nuclear Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan Department of Computer Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the performance of a deep learning system for differential diagnosis of lung cancer with conventional CT and FDG PET/CT using transfer learning (TL) and metadata. METHODS: A total of 359 patients with a lung mass or nodule who underwent noncontrast chest CT and FDG PET/CT prior to treatment were enrolled retrospectively. All pulmonary lesions were classified by pathology (257 malignant, 102 benign). Deep learning classification models based on ResNet-18 were developed using the pretrained weights obtained from ImageNet data set. We propose a deep TL model for differential diagnosis of lung cancer using CT imaging data and metadata with SUVmax and lesion size derived from PET/CT. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the deep learning model was measured as a performance metric and verified by 5-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: The performance metrics of the conventional CT model were generally better than those of the CT of PET/CT model. Introducing metadata with SUVmax and lesion size derived from PET/CT into baseline CT models improved the diagnostic performance of the CT of PET/CT model (AUC = 0.837 vs 0.762) and the conventional CT model (AUC = 0.877 vs 0.817). CONCLUSIONS: Deep TL models with CT imaging data provide good diagnostic performance for lung cancer, and the conventional CT model showed overall better performance than the CT of PET/CT model. Metadata information derived from PET/CT can improve the performance of deep learning systems.
PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the performance of a deep learning system for differential diagnosis of lung cancer with conventional CT and FDG PET/CT using transfer learning (TL) and metadata. METHODS: A total of 359 patients with a lung mass or nodule who underwent noncontrast chest CT and FDG PET/CT prior to treatment were enrolled retrospectively. All pulmonary lesions were classified by pathology (257 malignant, 102 benign). Deep learning classification models based on ResNet-18 were developed using the pretrained weights obtained from ImageNet data set. We propose a deep TL model for differential diagnosis of lung cancer using CT imaging data and metadata with SUVmax and lesion size derived from PET/CT. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the deep learning model was measured as a performance metric and verified by 5-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: The performance metrics of the conventional CT model were generally better than those of the CT of PET/CT model. Introducing metadata with SUVmax and lesion size derived from PET/CT into baseline CT models improved the diagnostic performance of the CT of PET/CT model (AUC = 0.837 vs 0.762) and the conventional CT model (AUC = 0.877 vs 0.817). CONCLUSIONS: Deep TL models with CT imaging data provide good diagnostic performance for lung cancer, and the conventional CT model showed overall better performance than the CT of PET/CT model. Metadata information derived from PET/CT can improve the performance of deep learning systems.