Literature DB >> 26286381

A Dutch nationwide evaluation of serological assays for detection of Borrelia antibodies in clinically well-defined patients.

C W Ang1, A H Brandenburg2, N D van Burgel3, H A Bijlmer4, T Herremans4, F Stelma5, F Verduyn Lunel6, A P van Dam7.   

Abstract

Numerous tests for the detection of antibodies against Borrelia burgdorferi are commercially available. Manufacturer-derived data invariably report a high sensitivity and specificity, but comparative studies demonstrate large differences in clinical practice, especially with regard to specificity. We retrospectively collected data from validation studies for B. burgdorferi antibody assays from 8 laboratories in the Netherlands. The total number of samples was 809. Samples were selected based on clinical and laboratory parameters. We included samples from patients with erythema migrans, acrodermatitis chronicum atrophicans, and neuroborreliosis; cross-reactivity controls; and healthy controls. Data are presented from 10 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and 5 immunoblots. For manifestations of B. burgdorferi infection with short disease duration, the positivity rate of the assays varied significantly. In patients with long disease duration, the positivity rate differed only marginally. In cross-reactivity controls, there was significant variation in the reactivity rate. The majority of false-positive reactions are of the IgM isotype.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Borrelia; ELISA; Lyme; Quality control; Serology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26286381     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  7 in total

1.  The Performance of Nine Commercial Serological Screening Assays for the Diagnosis of Lyme Borreliosis: a Multicenter Modified Two-Gate Design Study.

Authors:  B J A Hoeve-Bakker; Mark Jonker; Afke H Brandenburg; P Martijn den Reijer; Foekje F Stelma; Alje P van Dam; Tamara van Gorkom; Karen Kerkhof; Steven F T Thijsen; Kristin Kremer
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-03-17

2.  Borrelia burgdorferi Is a Poor Inducer of Gamma Interferon: Amplification Induced by Interleukin-12.

Authors:  Frederik R van de Schoor; Hedwig D Vrijmoeth; Michelle A E Brouwer; Hadewych J M Ter Hofstede; Heidi L M Lemmers; Helga Dijkstra; Collins K Boahen; Marije Oosting; Bart-Jan Kullberg; Joppe W Hovius; Cees C van den Wijngaard; Frank L van de Veerdonk; Mihai G Netea; Leo A B Joosten
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Diagnostic Performance of the Novel BioPlex Lyme Serological Assays in European Patients with Lyme Disease.

Authors:  M E (Ewoud) Baarsma; Jeanine Ursinus; Hans L Zaaijer; Herman Kuiper; Joppe W Hovius
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Cutaneous Lyme borreliosis: Guideline of the German Dermatology Society.

Authors:  Heidelore Hofmann; Volker Fingerle; Klaus-Peter Hunfeld; Hans-Iko Huppertz; Andreas Krause; Sebastian Rauer; Bernhard Ruf
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2017-09-05

5.  Modified interpretation criteria significantly improve performance of commercially available confirmatory assays for the serodiagnosis of Lyme borreliosis: a case-control study with clinically defined serum samples.

Authors:  Ulrike Hauser
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Diagnostic behaviour of general practitioners when suspecting Lyme disease: a database study from 2010-2015.

Authors:  Esmée Botman; C Wim Ang; Johanna H K Joosten; Pauline Slottje; Johannes C van der Wouden; Otto R Maarsingh
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Serological Diagnostics of Lyme Borreliosis: Comparison of Universal and Borrelia Species-Specific Tests Based on Whole-Cell and Recombinant Antigens.

Authors:  Petr Kodym; Zuzana Kurzová; Dagmar Berenová; Dušan Pícha; Dita Smíšková; Lenka Moravcová; Marek Malý
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.948

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.