Literature DB >> 33881552

[Establishing evidence-based prevention and health promotion: criteria for evidence-based interventions and necessary organizational requirements and capacities].

Freia De Bock1, Eva Rehfuess2,3.   

Abstract

The German Prevention Act underlines the need for an evidence-based approach to prevention and health promotion. It is unclear which steps and processes are necessary for the evolving system of prevention and health promotion in Germany to meet this requirement. This overview article aims to define and operationalize evidence-based interventions in prevention and health promotion and describes the necessary organizational support and capacity building to foster evidence-based action in practice.Based on the international scientific literature and the Federal Centre for Health Education's Memorandum on Evidence-based Prevention and Health Promotion, the term evidence-based intervention is defined and operationalized, and implementation requirements in terms of organizational processes and capacity building are described and discussed.To foster implementation of evidence-based action in practice, decision makers in policy and practice should draw on a shared understanding of the concept of evidence-based interventions and of the need for evaluations that assure generating evidence while implementing interventions. Moreover, organizational support is necessary, such as emphasizing the value of evidence-based action within organizations, ensuring access to existing evidence databases with a transparent and relevant presentation of evidence, advancing competencies of the workforce in searching for and interpreting evidence syntheses, as well as promoting a systematic cooperation between practitioners and researchers.Implementing the above-described elements for more evidence-based action is an important step towards strengthening the evolving system of prevention and health promotion as a fifth pillar of the German health system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Capacity building; Complex interventions; Effectiveness; Practice; Systems perspective

Year:  2021        PMID: 33881552     DOI: 10.1007/s00103-021-03320-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz        ISSN: 1436-9990            Impact factor:   1.513


  14 in total

1.  Standards of evidence: criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination.

Authors:  Brian R Flay; Anthony Biglan; Robert F Boruch; Felipe González Castro; Denise Gottfredson; Sheppard Kellam; Eve K Mościcki; Steven Schinke; Jeffrey C Valentine; Peter Ji
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2005-09

2.  Degrees of freedom and degrees of certainty: a developmental model for the establishment of evidence-based youth care.

Authors:  Jan W Veerman; Tom A van Yperen
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2007-01-26

3.  Standards of Evidence for Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Scale-up Research in Prevention Science: Next Generation.

Authors:  Denise C Gottfredson; Thomas D Cook; Frances E M Gardner; Deborah Gorman-Smith; George W Howe; Irwin N Sandler; Kathryn M Zafft
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2015-10

4.  The SPIRIT Action Framework: A structured approach to selecting and testing strategies to increase the use of research in policy.

Authors:  Sally Redman; Tari Turner; Huw Davies; Anna Williamson; Abby Haynes; Sue Brennan; Andrew Milat; Denise O'Connor; Fiona Blyth; Louisa Jorm; Sally Green
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 5.  [Evidence-based health promotion and prevention in settings: which types of study designs are needed?].

Authors:  Ansgar Gerhardus; Eva Rehfuess; Hajo Zeeb
Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes       Date:  2015-02-14

6.  [DNVF-Memorandum III - Methods For Health Services Research, Part 4 - Concept and Methods For Organizational Health Services Research. Chapter 1 - Definition and Concept of Organizational Health Services Research].

Authors:  Lena Ansmann; Walter Baumann; Johannes Gostomzyk; Katja Götz; Ursula Hahn; Holger Pfaff; Lars Rölker-Denker; Stefan Nöst
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2019-04-05

Review 7.  Natural Experiments: An Overview of Methods, Approaches, and Contributions to Public Health Intervention Research.

Authors:  Peter Craig; Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi; Alastair Leyland; Frank Popham
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 21.981

8.  When and how do 'effective' interventions need to be adapted and/or re-evaluated in new contexts? The need for guidance.

Authors:  Rhiannon E Evans; Peter Craig; Pat Hoddinott; Hannah Littlecott; Laurence Moore; Simon Murphy; Alicia O'Cathain; Lisa Pfadenhauer; Eva Rehfuess; Jeremy Segrott; Graham Moore
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.

Authors:  Graham F Moore; Suzanne Audrey; Mary Barker; Lyndal Bond; Chris Bonell; Wendy Hardeman; Laurence Moore; Alicia O'Cathain; Tannaze Tinati; Daniel Wight; Janis Baird
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-03-19

10.  Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance.

Authors:  Peter Craig; Cyrus Cooper; David Gunnell; Sally Haw; Kenny Lawson; Sally Macintyre; David Ogilvie; Mark Petticrew; Barney Reeves; Matt Sutton; Simon Thompson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.