Literature DB >> 26004208

The SPIRIT Action Framework: A structured approach to selecting and testing strategies to increase the use of research in policy.

Sally Redman1, Tari Turner2, Huw Davies3, Anna Williamson4, Abby Haynes5, Sue Brennan6, Andrew Milat7, Denise O'Connor8, Fiona Blyth9, Louisa Jorm10, Sally Green11.   

Abstract

The recent proliferation of strategies designed to increase the use of research in health policy (knowledge exchange) demands better application of contemporary conceptual understandings of how research shapes policy. Predictive models, or action frameworks, are needed to organise existing knowledge and enable a more systematic approach to the selection and testing of intervention strategies. Useful action frameworks need to meet four criteria: have a clearly articulated purpose; be informed by existing knowledge; provide an organising structure to build new knowledge; and be capable of guiding the development and testing of interventions. This paper describes the development of the SPIRIT Action Framework. A literature search and interviews with policy makers identified modifiable factors likely to influence the use of research in policy. An iterative process was used to combine these factors into a pragmatic tool which meets the four criteria. The SPIRIT Action Framework can guide conceptually-informed practical decisions in the selection and testing of interventions to increase the use of research in policy. The SPIRIT Action Framework hypothesises that a catalyst is required for the use of research, the response to which is determined by the capacity of the organisation to engage with research. Where there is sufficient capacity, a series of research engagement actions might occur that facilitate research use. These hypotheses are being tested in ongoing empirical work.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Action framework; Knowledge exchange; Research use

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26004208     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  41 in total

1.  "Alcohol During Pregnancy? Nobody Does That Anymore": State Legislators' Use of Evidence in Making Policy on Alcohol Use in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Katie Woodruff; Sarah C M Roberts
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.582

2.  Inter-agency collaboration is associated with increased frequency of research use in children's mental health policy making.

Authors:  Jonathan Purtle; Katherine L Nelson; Rebecca Lengnick-Hall; Sarah Mc Cue Horwitz; Lawrence A Palinkas; Mary M McKay; Kimberly E Hoagwood
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 3.734

3.  Using conjoint analysis to develop a system to score research engagement actions by health decision makers.

Authors:  Steve R Makkar; Anna Williamson; Tari Turner; Sally Redman; Jordan Louviere
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2015-04-26

4.  Figuring out fidelity: a worked example of the methods used to identify, critique and revise the essential elements of a contextualised intervention in health policy agencies.

Authors:  Abby Haynes; Sue Brennan; Sally Redman; Anna Williamson; Gisselle Gallego; Phyllis Butow
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 5.  The effectiveness of evidence summaries on health policymakers and health system managers use of evidence from systematic reviews: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer Petkovic; Vivian Welch; Maria Helena Jacob; Manosila Yoganathan; Ana Patricia Ayala; Heather Cunningham; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Do evidence summaries increase policy-makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews: A systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Jennifer Petkovic; Vivian Welch; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-28

7.  Using conjoint analysis to develop a system of scoring policymakers' use of research in policy and program development.

Authors:  Steve R Makkar; Anna Williamson; Tari Turner; Sally Redman; Jordan Louviere
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2015-08-04

Review 8.  Research impact: a narrative review.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; James Raftery; Steve Hanney; Matthew Glover
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  The development of ORACLe: a measure of an organisation's capacity to engage in evidence-informed health policy.

Authors:  Steve R Makkar; Tari Turner; Anna Williamson; Jordan Louviere; Sally Redman; Abby Haynes; Sally Green; Sue Brennan
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2016-01-14

10.  Which health research gets used and why? An empirical analysis of 30 cases.

Authors:  Maarten Olivier Kok; John Owusu Gyapong; Ivan Wolffers; David Ofori-Adjei; Joost Ruitenberg
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2016-05-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.