Literature DB >> 3387934

The Tromsø Heart Study: responders and non-responders to a health questionnaire, do they differ?

B K Jacobsen1, D S Thelle.   

Abstract

In 1979-80, 21,329 subjects, 20-54 years old, were invited to a screening for coronary heart disease risk factors in Tromsø. 16,621 (77%) attended the screening, the response rate was higher in women than in men, lower in single than married and lowest in young (20-29 years) men. At the screening, the men and women were given a second questionnaire which they were asked to fill in and return by mail. 14,667 (88.2%) of the subjects did so. Based on information obtained at the screening, the differences between these 14,667 subjects and the 1954 men and women who failed to return the questionnaire are presented. 10.9% of the women did not return the questionnaire, the corresponding figure for men was 12.6%. The differences in age, body mass index (kg/m2), blood lipids and blood pressure were minor or non-existent. The subjects who returned the questionnaire tended to be married, non-smokers and report respiratory symptoms less often than non-responders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3387934     DOI: 10.1177/140349488801600207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Soc Med        ISSN: 0300-8037


  38 in total

1.  Non-responders to a postal questionnaire on respiratory symptoms and diseases.

Authors:  E Rönmark; A Lundqvist; B Lundbäck; L Nyström
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Non-response and related factors in a nation-wide health survey.

Authors:  K Korkeila; S Suominen; J Ahvenainen; A Ojanlatva; P Rautava; H Helenius; M Koskenvuo
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Using pamphlets with mail surveys to improve response.

Authors:  L A Shaker; K Derycke-Chapman; L M Brass
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Estimating non-response bias in family studies: application to mental health and lifestyle.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Vink; Gonneke Willemsen; Janine H Stubbe; Christel M Middeldorp; Rozemarijn S L Ligthart; Kim D Baas; Hanneke J C Dirkzwager; Eco J C de Geus; Dorret I Boomsma
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Postal survey on airborne occupational exposure and respiratory disorders in Norway: causes and consequences of non-response.

Authors:  P Bakke; A Gulsvik; P Lilleng; O Overå; R Hanoa; G E Eide
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Decline in respiratory symptoms in service workers five months after a public smoking ban.

Authors:  T M L Eagan; J Hetland; L E Aarø
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Patient satisfaction reporting-a cohort study comparing reporting of patient satisfaction pre- and post-discharge from hospital.

Authors:  Muhammad Fahad Ullah; Christina A Fleming; Kenneth Mealy
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Leisure time physical activity in adulthood is positively associated with bone mineral density 22 years later. The Tromsø study.

Authors:  Bente Morseth; Nina Emaus; Tom Wilsgaard; Bjarne K Jacobsen; Lone Jørgensen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  Cardiovascular risk during early adult life. Risk markers among participants in "Live for Life" health promotion programme in Sweden.

Authors:  L G Persson; K Lindström; H Lingfors; C Bengtsson; L Lissner
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Comparison of participants and non-participants to the ORISCAV-LUX population-based study on cardiovascular risk factors in Luxembourg.

Authors:  Ala'a Alkerwi; Nicolas Sauvageot; Sophie Couffignal; Adelin Albert; Marie-Lise Lair; Michèle Guillaume
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.