Literature DB >> 31368005

Patient satisfaction reporting-a cohort study comparing reporting of patient satisfaction pre- and post-discharge from hospital.

Muhammad Fahad Ullah1, Christina A Fleming2, Kenneth Mealy2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients' satisfaction reporting is important for assessing the quality of care in surgical practice. Post-discharge questionnaire reporting is considered best practice; however, the logistics of this method remains problematic. AIMS: To examine patient satisfaction response rates prior to and following discharge from the hospital in a general surgery department.
METHODS: Two patient groups were examined: group 1-questionnaires were completed by patients prior to discharge; and group 2-questionnaires were posted to patients following discharge and were advised to return the questionnaire in a given time frame. The questionnaire design was based on the WHO strategy on measuring responsiveness guidelines tailored to a population of surgical patients.
RESULTS: Four hundred and fifty patients were examined [group 1 (N = 150); group 2 (N = 300)]). Results from pre- and post-discharge questionnaires were similar in almost all parameters. The response rate dropped significantly in group 2, and the cost was also significantly higher.
CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in reporting between pre- and post-discharge questionnaire responses. As pre-discharge reporting is more efficient, less costly and has a higher response rate, this should be considered the preferred practice in patient satisfaction assessments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  General surgery; Patient safety; Patient satisfaction

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31368005     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-019-02062-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  24 in total

1.  Patient satisfaction and its relationship with clinical quality and inpatient mortality in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Seth W Glickman; William Boulding; Matthew Manary; Richard Staelin; Matthew T Roe; Robert J Wolosin; E Magnus Ohman; Eric D Peterson; Kevin A Schulman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2010-02-23

2.  Surveys of patients satisfaction: I--Important general considerations.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-04-13

3.  Factors associated with survey response in hand surgery research.

Authors:  Arjan G J Bot; Jade A Anderson; Valentin Neuhaus; David Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Perception and use of the results of patient satisfaction surveys by care providers in a French teaching hospital.

Authors:  Laurent Boyer; Patrice Francois; Elisabeth Doutre; Georges Weil; Jose Labarere
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 2.038

5.  Improving efficiency and patient satisfaction in a tertiary teaching hospital preoperative clinic.

Authors:  Miriam J P Harnett; Darin J Correll; Shelley Hurwitz; Angela M Bader; David L Hepner
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Overall patient satisfaction with hospitals: effects of patient-reported experiences and fulfilment of expectations.

Authors:  Oyvind A Bjertnaes; Ingeborg Strømseng Sjetne; Hilde Hestad Iversen
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 7.035

7.  An investigation into nonresponse bias in a postal survey on urinary symptoms.

Authors:  H M Dallosso; R J Matthews; C W McGrother; M Clarke; S I Perry; C Shaw; C Jagger
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  The Tromsø Heart Study: responders and non-responders to a health questionnaire, do they differ?

Authors:  B K Jacobsen; D S Thelle
Journal:  Scand J Soc Med       Date:  1988

9.  Associations Between Waiting Times, Service Times, and Patient Satisfaction in an Endocrinology Outpatient Department: A Time Study and Questionnaire Survey.

Authors:  Zhenzhen Xie; Calvin Or
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

10.  Patient satisfaction with the healthcare system: Assessing the impact of socio-economic and healthcare provision factors.

Authors:  Sofia Xesfingi; Athanassios Vozikis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.