Literature DB >> 33879203

Impact of tricuspid regurgitation on late right ventricular failure in left ventricular assist device patients ~can prophylactic tricuspid annuloplasty prevent late right ventricular failure? ~.

Taro Nakazato1, Daisuke Yoshioka1, Koichi Toda1, Shigeru Miyagawa1, Satoshi Kainuma1, Takuji Kawamura1, Ai Kawamura1, Noriyuki Kashiyama1, Takayoshi Ueno1, Toru Kuratani1, Yasushi Sakata2, Yoshiki Sawa3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this study, we evaluated the prevalence of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) worsening in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) and its impact on late right ventricular (RV) failure.
METHODS: We enrolled 147 patients of the 184 patients who underwent continuous-flow LVAD implantations from 2005 to March 2018. The prevalence of postoperative TR worsening and late RV failure were retrospectively evaluated.
RESULTS: Concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty (TAP) was performed in 28 of 41 patients (68%) with preoperative TR greater than or equal to moderate (TR group) and in 23 of 106 patients (22%) with preoperative TR less than or equal to mild (non-TR group). Regarding the TR-free rates, despite receiving or not receiving concomitant TAP, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (TR group: p = 0.37; non-TR group: p = 0.42). Of the 9 patients with postoperative TR greater than or equal to moderate, late RV failure developed in 3 patients, with TR worsening after RV failure in each case. During follow-up, 16 patients (11%) had late RV failure. As for the late RV failure-free rates, despite receiving or not receiving concomitant TAP, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (TR group: p = 0.37; non-TR group: p = 0.96).
CONCLUSIONS: TR prognosis was preferable regardless of a patient receiving concomitant TAP; however, the presence of postoperative TR seemed to unrelated to late RV failure. Prophylactic TAP might not be necessary to prevent late RV failure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous flow; Left ventricular assist device; Right heart failure; Tricuspid annuloplasty; Tricuspid regurgitation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33879203     DOI: 10.1186/s13019-021-01492-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1749-8090            Impact factor:   1.637


  23 in total

1.  Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure.

Authors:  E A Rose; A C Gelijns; A J Moskowitz; D F Heitjan; L W Stevenson; W Dembitsky; J W Long; D D Ascheim; A R Tierney; R G Levitan; J T Watson; P Meier; N S Ronan; P A Shapiro; R M Lazar; L W Miller; L Gupta; O H Frazier; P Desvigne-Nickens; M C Oz; V L Poirier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Pulmonary artery pulsatility index predicts right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Guson Kang; Richard Ha; Dipanjan Banerjee
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  Preoperative risk factors for right ventricular failure after implantable left ventricular assist device insertion.

Authors:  K Fukamachi; P M McCarthy; N G Smedira; R L Vargo; R C Starling; J B Young
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Recovery of right heart function with temporary right ventricular assist using a centrifugal pump in patients with severe biventricular failure.

Authors:  Shunsuke Saito; Taichi Sakaguchi; Shigeru Miyagawa; Hiroyuki Nishi; Yasushi Yoshikawa; Satsuki Fukushima; Takashi Daimon; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 10.247

5.  Right heart failure and "failure to thrive" after left ventricular assist device: clinical predictors and outcomes.

Authors:  Jay Baumwol; Peter S Macdonald; Anne M Keogh; Eugene Kotlyar; Phillip Spratt; Paul Jansz; Christopher S Hayward
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Right ventricular failure in patients with the HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: incidence, risk factors, and effect on outcomes.

Authors:  Robert L Kormos; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Francis D Pagani; Stuart D Russell; Ranjit John; Leslie W Miller; Todd Massey; Carmelo A Milano; Nader Moazami; Kartik S Sundareswaran; David J Farrar
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Right heart failure and benefits of adjuvant tricuspid valve repair in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Fujita; Junjiro Kobayashi; Hiroki Hata; Osamu Seguchi; Yoshihiro Murata; Masanobu Yanase; Takeshi Nakatani
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Mark S Slaughter; Joseph G Rogers; Carmelo A Milano; Stuart D Russell; John V Conte; David Feldman; Benjamin Sun; Antone J Tatooles; Reynolds M Delgado; James W Long; Thomas C Wozniak; Waqas Ghumman; David J Farrar; O Howard Frazier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Fifth INTERMACS annual report: risk factor analysis from more than 6,000 mechanical circulatory support patients.

Authors:  James K Kirklin; David C Naftel; Robert L Kormos; Lynne W Stevenson; Francis D Pagani; Marissa A Miller; J T Baldwin; J Timothy Baldwin; James B Young
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 10.247

10.  The right ventricular failure risk score a pre-operative tool for assessing the risk of right ventricular failure in left ventricular assist device candidates.

Authors:  Jennifer Cowger Matthews; Todd M Koelling; Francis D Pagani; Keith D Aaronson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.