Literature DB >> 33879149

Evaluating health service outcomes of public involvement in health service design in high-income countries: a systematic review.

Nicola Lloyd1, Amanda Kenny2, Nerida Hyett2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Internationally, it is expected that health services will involve the public in health service design. Evaluation of public involvement has typically focused on the process and experiences for participants. Less is known about outcomes for health services. The aim of this systematic review was to a) identify and synthesise what is known about health service outcomes of public involvement and b) document how outcomes were evaluated.
METHODS: Searches were undertaken in MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and CINAHL for studies that reported health service outcomes from public involvement in health service design. The review was limited to high-income countries and studies in English. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in health research. Content analysis was used to determine the outcomes of public involvement in health service design and how outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 93 articles were included. The majority were published in the last 5 years, were qualitative, and were located in the United Kingdom. A range of health service outcomes (discrete products, improvements to health services and system/policy level changes) were reported at various levels (service level, across services, and across organisations). However, evaluations of outcomes were reported in less than half of studies. In studies where outcomes were evaluated, a range of methods were used; most frequent were mixed methods. The quality of study design and reporting was inconsistent.
CONCLUSION: When reporting public involvement in health service design authors outline a range of outcomes for health services, but it is challenging to determine the extent of outcomes due to inadequate descriptions of study design and poor reporting. There is an urgent need for evaluations, including longitudinal study designs and cost-benefit analyses, to fully understand outcomes from public involvement in health service design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Co-design; Evaluation; Health service design; Outcomes; Public involvement; Systematic review

Year:  2021        PMID: 33879149     DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06319-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1472-6963            Impact factor:   2.655


  103 in total

1.  Public involvement in health care.

Authors:  Dominique Florin; Jennifer Dixon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-17

Review 2.  Community participation in rural primary health care: intervention or approach?

Authors:  Robyn Preston; Hilary Waugh; Sarah Larkins; Judy Taylor
Journal:  Aust J Prim Health       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.307

Review 3.  Community participation for rural health: a review of challenges.

Authors:  Amanda Kenny; Jane Farmer; Virginia Dickson-Swift; Nerida Hyett
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carole Mockford; Sophie Staniszewska; Frances Griffiths; Sandra Herron-Marx
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 2.038

5.  Disentangling patient and public involvement in healthcare decisions: why the difference matters.

Authors:  Mio Fredriksson; Jonathan Q Tritter
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2016-11-11

Review 6.  A systematic review of reliable and valid tools for the measurement of patient participation in healthcare.

Authors:  Nicole Margaret Phillips; Maryann Street; Emily Haesler
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 7.035

7.  Citizen participation in health services co-production: a roadmap for navigating participation types and outcomes.

Authors:  Jane Farmer; Judy Taylor; Ellen Stewart; Amanda Kenny
Journal:  Aust J Prim Health       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.307

8.  'Is it worth doing?' Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement in research.

Authors:  Kristina Staley
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2015-07-31

9.  Patient and public engagement in research and health system decision making: A systematic review of evaluation tools.

Authors:  Antoine Boivin; Audrey L'Espérance; François-Pierre Gauvin; Vincent Dumez; Ann C Macaulay; Pascale Lehoux; Julia Abelson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in health research and its assessment: a UK-based qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Joanna C Crocker; Anne-Marie Boylan; Jennifer Bostock; Louise Locock
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Supporting efficiency improvement in public health systems: a rapid evidence synthesis.

Authors:  James Kenneth Walters; Anurag Sharma; Emma Malica; Reema Harrison
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.655

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.