Literature DB >> 33878174

Identifying Range-of-Motion Deficits and Talocrural Joint Laxity After an Acute Lateral Ankle Sprain.

Bethany A Wisthoff1, Carrie L Docherty2, Joseph Glutting1, Geoff Gustavsen1, Todd D Royer1, Charles Buz Swanik1, Thomas W Kaminski1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Approximately 72% of patients with an ankle sprain report residual symptoms 6 to 18 months later. Although 44% of patients return to activity in less than 24 hours after experiencing a sprain, residual symptoms should be evaluated in the long term to determine if deficits exist. These residual symptoms may be due to the quality of ligament tissue and motion after injury.
OBJECTIVE: To compare mechanical laxity of the talocrural joint and dorsiflexion range of motion (DFROM) over time (24 to 72 hours, 2 to 4 weeks, and 6 months) after an acute lateral ankle sprain (LAS).
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Athletic training research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 108 volunteers were recruited. Fifty-five participants had an acute LAS and 53 participants were control individuals without a history of LAS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Mechanical laxity (talofibular interval and anterior talofibular ligament length) was measured in inversion (INV) and via the anterior drawer test. The weight-bearing lunge test was conducted and DFROM was measured. The data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance, independent-samples t tests, and 1-way analysis of variance.
RESULTS: Of the 55 LASs, 21 (38%) were grade I, 27 (49%) were grade II, and 7 (13%) were grade III. Increases were noted in DFROM over time, between 24 and 72 hours, at 2 to 4 weeks, and at 6 months (P < .05). The DFROM was less in participants with grade III than grade I LASs (P = .004) at 24 to 72 hours; INV length was greater at 24 to 72 hours than at 2 to 4 weeks (P = .023) and at 6 months (P = .035) than at 24 to 72 hours. The anterior drawer length (P = .001) and INV talofibular interval (P = .004) were greater in the LAS group than in the control group at 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in range of motion and laxity were evident among grades at various time points and may indicate different clinical responses after an LAS. © by the National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior drawer test; inversion; talofibular interval; weight-bearing lunge test

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33878174      PMCID: PMC8063659          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-391.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  34 in total

1.  Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a weight-bearing lunge measure of ankle dorsiflexion.

Authors:  Kim L Bennell; Richard C Talbot; Henry Wajswelner; Wassana Techovanich; David H Kelly; Andrew J Hall
Journal:  Aust J Physiother       Date:  1998

2.  Acute lateral ankle sprains in track and field athletes: an expanded classification.

Authors:  Nikolaos Malliaropoulos; Emmanuel Papacostas; Agapi Papalada; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Foot Ankle Clin       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.653

3.  Dorsiflexion deficit during jogging with chronic ankle instability.

Authors:  Lindsay K Drewes; Patrick O McKeon; D Casey Kerrigan; Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 4.319

Review 4.  Common sports-related musculoskeletal injuries presenting to the emergency department.

Authors:  Gary J Browne; Peter Lj Barnett
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.954

5.  Establishing the Minimal Clinical Important Difference and Minimal Detectable Change for the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool.

Authors:  Cynthia J Wright; Shelley W Linens; M Spencer Cain
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Effects of ankle sprain in a general clinic population 6 to 18 months after medical evaluation.

Authors:  B L Braun
Journal:  Arch Fam Med       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr

7.  Chronic ankle instability: evolution of the model.

Authors:  Claire E Hiller; Sharon L Kilbreath; Kathryn M Refshauge
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  The Epidemiology of Lateral Ligament Complex Ankle Sprains in National Collegiate Athletic Association Sports.

Authors:  Karen G Roos; Zachary Y Kerr; Timothy C Mauntel; Aristarque Djoko; Thomas P Dompier; Erik A Wikstrom
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 9.  Ankle ligament healing after an acute ankle sprain: an evidence-based approach.

Authors:  Tricia J Hubbard; Charlie A Hicks-Little
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  2016 consensus statement of the International Ankle Consortium: prevalence, impact and long-term consequences of lateral ankle sprains.

Authors:  Phillip A Gribble; Chris M Bleakley; Brian M Caulfield; Carrie L Docherty; François Fourchet; Daniel Tik-Pui Fong; Jay Hertel; Claire E Hiller; Thomas W Kaminski; Patrick O McKeon; Kathryn M Refshauge; Evert A Verhagen; Bill T Vicenzino; Erik A Wikstrom; Eamonn Delahunt
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 13.800

View more
  1 in total

1.  Distal insertion rupture of lateral ankle ligament as a predictor of weakened and delayed sports recovery after acute ligament repair: mid-term outcomes of 117 cases.

Authors:  Mingze Du; Jun Li; Chen Jiao; Qinwei Guo; Yuelin Hu; Dong Jiang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.362

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.