Literature DB >> 28137476

Establishing the Minimal Clinical Important Difference and Minimal Detectable Change for the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool.

Cynthia J Wright1, Shelley W Linens2, M Spencer Cain2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish the minimal detectable change (MDC) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) in a population with chronic ankle instability (CAI).
DESIGN: Experimental cohort.
SETTING: Laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of individuals with CAI (N=50; 12 men; 38 women; episodes of giving way, 5.84±12.54mo). CAI inclusion criteria included a history of an ankle sprain, recurrent episodes of giving way, and a CAIT score ≤25.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants completed demographic information, an injury history questionnaire, and the CAIT. Participants then either participated in 4 weeks of wobble board balance training, resistance tubing strength training, or no intervention. After 4 weeks, participants recompleted the CAIT and recorded their global rating of change (GRC). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dependent variables were pre- and postintervention scores on the CAIT and postintervention GRC. The MDC with 95% confidence interval was calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve identified the optimal CAIT cut point (MCID) between improved and unimproved individuals on the basis of their GRC. The area under the curve was used to identify a significant ROC curve (α=.05).
RESULTS: The average CAIT score preintervention was 16.8±5.6, and postintervention, it was 20.0±5.2. Thirty-one participants (62%) rated themselves as improved on the GRC scale, whereas 19 (38%) were not improved. The ROC curve was significant (area under the curve, .797; P=.001), indicating that the CAIT change score significantly predicted clinical status. The MDC was 3.08, and the MCID was ≥3 points.
CONCLUSIONS: The CAIT has an MDC and MCID of ≥3 points. When CAIT scores are used to assess patient change over time, these scores should be used as a minimum threshold to indicate detectable and clinically meaningful improvement.
Copyright © 2017 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle injuries; Outcome assessment (health care); ROC curve; Rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28137476     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  11 in total

1.  Ankle-Joint Self-Mobilization and CrossFit Training in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  David Cruz-Díaz; Fidel Hita-Contreras; Antonio Martínez-Amat; Agustin Aibar-Almazán; Kyung-Min Kim
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Four-Week Ankle-Rehabilitation Programs in Adolescent Athletes With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Authors:  M Spencer Cain; Rebecca J Ban; Yu-Ping Chen; Mark D Geil; Benjamin M Goerger; Shelley W Linens
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Immediate Effect of Warm-Up on Single-Leg Balance in Individuals with and without Functional Ankle Instability.

Authors:  Emily Abalos; You-Jou Hung
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2022-07-01

4.  Does Multimodal Rehabilitation for Ankle Instability Improve Patients' Self-assessed Functional Outcomes? A Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tsikopoulos; Dimitris Mavridis; Dimitrios Georgiannos; Haris S Vasiliadis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Identifying Range-of-Motion Deficits and Talocrural Joint Laxity After an Acute Lateral Ankle Sprain.

Authors:  Bethany A Wisthoff; Carrie L Docherty; Joseph Glutting; Geoff Gustavsen; Todd D Royer; Charles Buz Swanik; Thomas W Kaminski
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties' evaluation of the modern standard Arabic version of Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) in professional athletes.

Authors:  Vasileios Korakakis; Mohsen Abassi; Argyro Kotsifak; Hassine Manai; Anas AbuEsba
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A Possible Mobile Health Solution in Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery: Development Protocol and User Evaluation of the Ankle Joint App.

Authors:  Florian Dittrich; David Alexander Back; Anna Katharina Harren; Marcus Jäger; Stefan Landgraeber; Felix Reinecke; Sascha Beck
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.773

8.  A pilot randomised control trial of the efficacy of stability-based training with visualisation for people with chronic ankle instability.

Authors:  L Forsyth; J Bonacci; C Childs
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Neurofascial Dextrose Prolotherapy for Managing Chronic Ankle Ligament Injury.

Authors:  Morteza Kazempour Mofrad; Zahra Rezasoltani; Afsaneh Dadarkhah; Sanaz Hamidi Panah; Seyed Morteza Tabatabaee; Arezoo Azarakhsh
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2022-01-23

10.  Short-Term Effects of Balance Training with Stroboscopic Vision for Patients with Chronic Ankle Instability: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Kyung-Min Kim; María D Estudillo-Martínez; Yolanda Castellote-Caballero; Alejandro Estepa-Gallego; David Cruz-Díaz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.