Literature DB >> 33877642

An Exploratory Study of Epigenetic Age in Preeclamptic and Normotensive Pregnancy Reveals Differences by Self-Reported Race but Not Pregnancy Outcome.

Lacey W Heinsberg1,2,3, Mitali Ray4, Yvette P Conley5,4, James M Roberts6,7,8,9,10, Arun Jeyabalan6,7,8,10, Carl A Hubel7,8, Daniel E Weeks5,11, Mandy J Schmella4.   

Abstract

Preeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Chronological age and race are associated with preeclampsia, but the role of these factors is not entirely understood. We hypothesized that DNA methylation age, a measure of biological age, would be higher in individuals with preeclampsia than in individuals with normotensive pregnancy and that DNA methylation age would differ by race across pregnancy. This was a longitudinal, exploratory study of 56 pregnant individuals (n = 28 preeclampsia cases and n = 28 normotensive controls). Genome-wide DNA methylation data were generated from trimester-specific peripheral blood samples. DNA methylation age was estimated using the "Improved Precision" clock, and ∆age, the difference between DNA methylation age and chronological age, was computed. DNA methylation age was compared with chronological age using Pearson correlations. The relationships between ∆age and preeclampsia status, self-reported race, and covariates were tested using multiple linear regression and performed both with and without consideration of cell-type heterogeneity. We observed strong correlation between chronological age and DNA methylation age across pregnancy, with significantly stronger correlation observed in White participants than in Black participants. We observed no association between ∆age and preeclampsia status. However, ∆age was higher in participants with higher pre-pregnancy body mass index in trimester 1 and lower in Black participants than in White participants in trimesters 2 and 3. Observations were largely consistent when controlling for cell-type heterogeneity. Our findings in a small sample support the need for additional studies to investigate the relationship between race and biological age, which could provide further insight into racial disparities across pregnancy. However, this study does not support an association between ∆age and preeclampsia status.
© 2021. Society for Reproductive Investigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biologic aging; Epigenetic age; Maternal health; Preeclampsia; Race; Racial disparities

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33877642      PMCID: PMC8526649          DOI: 10.1007/s43032-021-00575-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Sci        ISSN: 1933-7191            Impact factor:   3.060


  2 in total

1.  Black Women's Perspectives on Structural Racism across the Reproductive Lifespan: A Conceptual Framework for Measurement Development.

Authors:  Brittany D Chambers; Helen A Arega; Silvia E Arabia; Brianne Taylor; Robyn G Barron; Brandi Gates; Loretta Scruggs-Leach; Karen A Scott; Monica R McLemore
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-01-04

2.  Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Research Studies: The Challenge of Creating More Diverse Cohorts.

Authors:  Lindsey Konkel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  2 in total
  3 in total

1.  An exploratory study of white blood cell proportions across preeclamptic and normotensive pregnancy by self-identified race in individuals with overweight or obesity.

Authors:  Mitali Ray; Lacey W Heinsberg; Yvette P Conley; James M Roberts; Arun Jeyabalan; Carl A Hubel; Daniel E Weeks; Mandy J Schmella
Journal:  Hypertens Pregnancy       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 2.108

2.  Advancing understanding of maternal age: correlating epigenetic clocks in blood and myometrium.

Authors:  Elise N Erickson; Anna K Knight; Alicia K Smith; Leslie Myatt
Journal:  Epigenetics Commun       Date:  2022-05-23

3.  Evaluation of epigenetic age calculators between preeclampsia and normotensive pregnancies in an Australian cohort.

Authors:  Paulina Pruszkowska-Przybylska; Shaun Brennecke; Eric K Moses; Phillip E Melton
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.