| Literature DB >> 33877510 |
Stephanie Cheung1, Alessandra Parrella1, Danielle Tavares1, Derek Keating1, Philip Xie1, Zev Rosenwaks1, Gianpiero D Palermo2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To characterize, by specific biomarkers and nucleic acid sequencing, the structural and genomic sperm characteristics of partial (PG) and complete globozoospermic (CG) men in order to identify the best reproductive treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Assisted oocyte activation; Gene mutations; Globozoospermia; ICSI; Phospholipase C zeta; Proteomics; RNA expression
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33877510 PMCID: PMC8417186 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02191-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet ISSN: 1058-0468 Impact factor: 3.412
Fig. 1A total of 14 couples were enrolled in this study. Following standard semen analysis, spermatozoa from each patient were assessed ultrastructurally, as well as for histone content, sperm chromatin integrity, and aneuploidy. Patients were then allocated to two groups based on the proportion of round-headed spermatozoa. Those who exhibited 100% of the round-headed morphology were diagnosed as complete globozoospermic (CG), while those with a large fraction of spermatozoa exhibiting round-headed morphology were considered partial globozoospermic (PG). Additional genetics and transcriptomic analyses were performed on the spermatozoa from consenting men (n = 3) to further characterize the CG type. Of the 14 couples, 2 eventually elected to be treated elsewhere or not pursue infertility treatment. We then screened patients for OASCF by PLCζ assessment. Couples with a normal OASCF who were continuing at our center (n = 4) were treated with conventional ICSI, while consenting couples with an OASCF deficiency (n = 7) were treated by ICSI with AGT
Couples’ demographics, gamete characteristics, and outcomes for previous ICSI cycles
| Number of (%) | Total |
|---|---|
| Couples | 14 |
| Female age | 33.7 ± 3 |
| Male age | 36.1 ± 3 |
| Semen parameters | |
| Concentration (×106/mL) | 36.0 ± 44 |
| Motility (%) | 20.3 ± 20 |
| Normal morphology (%) | 0.2 ± 0.4 |
| Cycles | 21 |
| Injected oocytes (M ± SD) | 12.7 ± 9 |
| Fertilization (%) | 35/268 (13.1) |
| Cycles with embryo transfer* | 11 |
| Embryos transferred per cycle (M ± SD) | 1.7 ± 1 |
| Implantation (%) | 1/19 (5.2) |
| Clinical pregnancy per cycle (%) | 1/11 (9.0) |
| Clinical pregnancy per patient (%) | 1/8 (12.5) |
| Delivered per patient (%) | 0 (0) |
| Pregnancy loss per patient (%) | 1 (100) |
*Embryo transfer was performed on day 3 or 5 at the cleavage or blastocyst stage, respectively
Sperm function, structural, and genomic characteristics
| Parameters % (mean ± SD) | All ( | Partial ( | Complete ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OASCF | 27.0 ± 22 | 34 ± 4 | 7.4 ± 4 | 0.001 |
| Abnormal TEM | 98.8 ± 1 | 98 ± 1 | 100 ± 0 | 0.01 |
| Residual histones | 46.9 ± 21 | 40 ± 19 | 53.8 ± 24 | NS |
| DNA fragmentation | 18.1 ± 8 | 16.3 ± 2 | 19.5 ± 12 | NS |
| FISH aneuploidy | 4.3 ± 5 | 0.9 ± 0 | 5.5 ± 5 | NS |
P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant
ICSI outcomes of couples with the presence of OASCF in comparison to their historical cycles
| Number of (%) | Treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Previous cycles | Subsequent ICSI | ||
| Couples | 4 | ||
| Female age | 32.2 ± 1 | 33.0 ± 1 | NS |
| Male age | 33.5 ± 2 | 34.0 ± 2 | NS |
| Cycles | 4 | 8 | – |
| Injected oocytes (M ± SD) | 11.7 ± 5 | 14.8 ± 4 | NS |
| Fertilization (%) | 18/47 (38.2) | 43/119 (36.1) | NS |
| Cycles with embryo transfer | 4 | 8 | – |
| Embryos transferred per cycle (M ± SD) | 2.7 ± 1 | 2.5 ± 1 | NS |
| Implantation (%) | 0/11 (0) | 4/20 (20) | NS |
| Clinical pregnancy per patient (%) | 0/4 (0) | 2/4 (50) | NS |
| Deliveries (%) | – | 2 (100) | NS |
NS, nonsignificant
ICSI outcomes of couples with the absence of OASCF in comparison to their historical cycles
| Number of (%) | Treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Previous cycles | Subsequent ICSI + AGT | ||
| Couples | 7 | ||
| Female age | 34.4 ± 8 | ||
| Male age | 35.5 ± 7 | ||
| Cycles | 9 | 9 | – |
| Injected oocytes (M ± SD) | 15.5 ± 14 | 10.7 ± 9 | NS |
| Fertilization (%) | 8/140 (5.7) | 39/97 (40.2) | 0.00001 |
| Cycles with embryo transfer | 4 | 9 | – |
| Embryos transferred per cycle (M ± SD) | 0.8 ± 1 | 2.3 ± 1 | 0.005 |
| Implantation (%) | 0/5 (0) | 6/21 (28.6) | NS |
| Clinical pregnancy per patient (%) | 0/7 (0) | 5/7 (71.4) | NS |
| Deliveries (%) | 0 (0) | 4 (80) | NS |
| Pregnancy loss (%) | – | 1 (20) | NS |
P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant; NS, nonsignificant
Fig. 2Global transcriptional change across the groups compared. All the genes are plotted, and each data point represents a gene. The log2 fold change of each gene is represented on the x-axis, and the log10 of its P-value is on the y-axis. Genes with a P-value < 0.1 and a log2 fold change greater than 1 are indicated by red dots, representing upregulated genes. Genes with a P-value < 0.1 and a log2 fold change less than 0 are indicated by blue dots, representing downregulated genes