Literature DB >> 33875739

Image-based personalization of computational models for predicting response of high-grade glioma to chemoradiation.

David A Hormuth1,2, Karine A Al Feghali3, Andrew M Elliott3, Thomas E Yankeelov4,5,6,7,8,9, Caroline Chung3.   

Abstract

High-grade gliomas are an aggressive and invasive malignancy which are susceptible to treatment resistance due to heterogeneity in intratumoral properties such as cell proliferation and density and perfusion. Non-invasive imaging approaches can measure these properties, which can then be used to calibrate patient-specific mathematical models of tumor growth and response. We employed multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify tumor extent (via contrast-enhanced T1-weighted, and T2-FLAIR) and capture intratumoral heterogeneity in cell density (via diffusion-weighted imaging) to calibrate a family of mathematical models of chemoradiation response in nine patients with unresected or partially resected disease. The calibrated model parameters were used to forecast spatially-mapped individual tumor response at future imaging visits. We then employed the Akaike information criteria to select the most parsimonious member from the family, a novel two-species model describing the enhancing and non-enhancing components of the tumor. Using this model, we achieved low error in predictions of the enhancing volume (median: - 2.5%, interquartile range: 10.0%) and a strong correlation in total cell count (Kendall correlation coefficient 0.79) at 3-months post-treatment. These preliminary results demonstrate the plausibility of using multiparametric MRI data to inform spatially-informative, biologically-based predictive models of tumor response in the setting of clinical high-grade gliomas.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33875739     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87887-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  42 in total

1.  Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group.

Authors:  Patrick Y Wen; David R Macdonald; David A Reardon; Timothy F Cloughesy; A Gregory Sorensen; Evanthia Galanis; John Degroot; Wolfgang Wick; Mark R Gilbert; Andrew B Lassman; Christina Tsien; Tom Mikkelsen; Eric T Wong; Marc C Chamberlain; Roger Stupp; Kathleen R Lamborn; Michael A Vogelbaum; Martin J van den Bent; Susan M Chang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Radiation therapy dose escalation for glioblastoma multiforme in the era of temozolomide.

Authors:  Shahed N Badiyan; Stephanie Markovina; Joseph R Simpson; Clifford G Robinson; Todd DeWees; David D Tran; Gerry Linette; Rohan Jalalizadeh; Ralph Dacey; Keith M Rich; Michael R Chicoine; Joshua L Dowling; Eric C Leuthardt; Gregory J Zipfel; Albert H Kim; Jiayi Huang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  Molecular and cellular heterogeneity: the hallmark of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Diane J Aum; David H Kim; Thomas L Beaumont; Eric C Leuthardt; Gavin P Dunn; Albert H Kim
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.047

4.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Roger Stupp; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Michael Weller; Barbara Fisher; Martin J B Taphoorn; Karl Belanger; Alba A Brandes; Christine Marosi; Ulrich Bogdahn; Jürgen Curschmann; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Thierry Gorlia; Anouk Allgeier; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; René O Mirimanoff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Glioblastoma and other malignant gliomas: a clinical review.

Authors:  Antonio Omuro; Lisa M DeAngelis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  An image-driven parameter estimation problem for a reaction-diffusion glioma growth model with mass effects.

Authors:  Cosmina Hogea; Christos Davatzikos; George Biros
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  Feasibility of extreme dose escalation for glioblastoma multiforme using 4π radiotherapy.

Authors:  Dan Nguyen; Jean-Claude M Rwigema; Victoria Y Yu; Tania Kaprealian; Patrick Kupelian; Michael Selch; Percy Lee; Daniel A Low; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  A patient-specific computational model of hypoxia-modulated radiation resistance in glioblastoma using 18F-FMISO-PET.

Authors:  Russell C Rockne; Andrew D Trister; Joshua Jacobs; Andrea J Hawkins-Daarud; Maxwell L Neal; Kristi Hendrickson; Maciej M Mrugala; Jason K Rockhill; Paul Kinahan; Kenneth A Krohn; Kristin R Swanson
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Discriminating survival outcomes in patients with glioblastoma using a simulation-based, patient-specific response metric.

Authors:  Maxwell Lewis Neal; Andrew D Trister; Tyler Cloke; Rita Sodt; Sunyoung Ahn; Anne L Baldock; Carly A Bridge; Albert Lai; Timothy F Cloughesy; Maciej M Mrugala; Jason K Rockhill; Russell C Rockne; Kristin R Swanson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Forecasting tumor and vasculature response dynamics to radiation therapy via image based mathematical modeling.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Angela M Jarrett; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  7 in total

1.  A Multi-Compartment Model of Glioma Response to Fractionated Radiation Therapy Parameterized via Time-Resolved Microscopy Data.

Authors:  Junyan Liu; David A Hormuth; Jianchen Yang; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 2.  Integrating mechanism-based modeling with biomedical imaging to build practical digital twins for clinical oncology.

Authors:  Chengyue Wu; Guillermo Lorenzo; David A Hormuth; Ernesto A B F Lima; Kalina P Slavkova; Julie C DiCarlo; John Virostko; Caleb M Phillips; Debra Patt; Caroline Chung; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Biophys Rev (Melville)       Date:  2022-05-17

3.  Deep Learning for Reaction-Diffusion Glioma Growth Modeling: Towards a Fully Personalized Model?

Authors:  Corentin Martens; Antonin Rovai; Daniele Bonatto; Thierry Metens; Olivier Debeir; Christine Decaestecker; Serge Goldman; Gaetan Van Simaeys
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  A time-resolved experimental-mathematical model for predicting the response of glioma cells to single-dose radiation therapy.

Authors:  Junyan Liu; David A Hormuth; Tessa Davis; Jianchen Yang; Matthew T McKenna; Angela M Jarrett; Heiko Enderling; Amy Brock; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.177

Review 5.  A Century of Fractionated Radiotherapy: How Mathematical Oncology Can Break the Rules.

Authors:  Nima Ghaderi; Joseph Jung; Sarah C Brüningk; Ajay Subramanian; Lauren Nassour; Jeffrey Peacock
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Initial Condition Assessment for Reaction-Diffusion Glioma Growth Models: A Translational MRI-Histology (In)Validation Study.

Authors:  Corentin Martens; Laetitia Lebrun; Christine Decaestecker; Thomas Vandamme; Yves-Rémi Van Eycke; Antonin Rovai; Thierry Metens; Olivier Debeir; Serge Goldman; Isabelle Salmon; Gaetan Van Simaeys
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2021-10-29

7.  Modelling glioma progression, mass effect and intracranial pressure in patient anatomy.

Authors:  Jana Lipková; Bjoern Menze; Benedikt Wiestler; Petros Koumoutsakos; John S Lowengrub
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.118

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.