Literature DB >> 33875730

Usefulness of semi-automatic harmonization strategy of standardized uptake values for multicenter PET studies.

Hiromitsu Daisaki1,2, Kazuhiro Kitajima3, Masatoyo Nakajo4, Tadashi Watabe5, Kimiteru Ito6, Fumi Sakamoto7, Tadaki Nakahara8, Mana Ishibashi9, Akira Toriihara10.   

Abstract

This study assessed the possibility of semi-automatic harmonization of standardized uptake values (SUVs) in multicenter studies. Phantom data were acquired using 16 PET/CT scanners (including 3 PET/CT scanners with a silicon photomultiplier detector). PET images obtained using 30-min/bed scans for optimum harmonization filter calculations and using 90-180-s/bed scans for SUV validation under clinical conditions were obtained. Time of flight and a reconstruction method with point-spread function correction were allowed. The optimal full width at half maximum of the 3D-Gaussian filter that minimizes the root mean square error with the median value of the JSNM harmonization range was calculated semi-automatically. The SUVmax and the SUVpeak of the hot spheres were measured, and the inter-scanner coefficient of variation (COV) was calculated before and after harmonization. The harmonization filter was applied to 11 of the 15 PET/CT scanners in which the SUV calibration accuracy had been verified, but not in the remaining 4 scanners. Under noiseless conditions before harmonization, the inter-scanner COVs of the SUVmax and the SUVpeak were as high as 21.57% and 12.20%, respectively, decreasing to 8.79% and 5.73% after harmonization, respectively. Harmonization brought the SUVmax of all the hot spheres to within the harmonization range. Even under clinical conditions affected by image noise, the inter-scanner COVs for the SUVmax and SUVpeak were as high as 8.83% and 5.18% after harmonization, respectively. By applying an optimal harmonization filter that is calculated semi-automatically, the harmonization of SUVs according to the JSNM strategy is possible in multicenter studies, thereby reducing inter-scanner COVs.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33875730     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87942-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  1 in total

1.  Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management.

Authors:  Rachel Bar-Shalom; Nikolai Yefremov; Ludmila Guralnik; Diana Gaitini; Alex Frenkel; Abraham Kuten; Hernan Altman; Zohar Keidar; Ora Israel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 10.057

  1 in total
  2 in total

1.  New standards for phantom image quality and SUV harmonization range for multicenter oncology PET studies.

Authors:  Go Akamatsu; Naoki Shimada; Keiichi Matsumoto; Hiromitsu Daisaki; Kazufumi Suzuki; Hiroshi Watabe; Keiichi Oda; Michio Senda; Takashi Terauchi; Ukihide Tateishi
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.668

2.  Tumor response evaluation in patients with malignant melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and prognosis prediction using 18F-FDG PET/CT: multicenter study for comparison of EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Tadashi Watabe; Masatoyo Nakajo; Mana Ishibashi; Hiromitsu Daisaki; Fumihiko Soeda; Atsushi Tanemura; Takuro Kanekura; Naoya Yamazaki; Kimiteru Ito
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 2.374

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.