Literature DB >> 33875416

CA125 test result, test-to-diagnosis interval, and stage in ovarian cancer at diagnosis: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records.

Garth Funston1, Luke Ta Mounce2, Sarah Price2, Brian Rous3, Emma J Crosbie4, Willie Hamilton2, Fiona M Walter1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the UK, the cancer antigen 125 (CA125) test is recommended as a first-line investigation in women with symptoms of possible ovarian cancer. AIM: To compare time between initial primary care CA125 test and diagnosis, tumour morphology, and stage in women with normal (<35 U/ml) and abnormal (≥35 U/ml) CA125 levels prior to ovarian cancer diagnosis. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Retrospective cohort study using English primary care and cancer registry data.
METHOD: Associations between CA125 test results and test-to-diagnosis interval, stage, and ovarian cancer morphology were examined.
RESULTS: In total, 456 women were diagnosed with ovarian cancer in the 12 months after having a CA125 test. Of these, 351 (77%) had an abnormal, and 105 (23%) had a normal, CA125 test result. The median test-to-diagnosis interval was 35 days (interquartile range [IQR] 21-53) for those with abnormal CA125 levels, and 64 days (IQR 42-127) for normal CA125 levels. Tumour morphology differed by CA125 result: indolent borderline tumours were less common in those with abnormal CA125 levels (n = 47, 13%) than those with normal CA125 levels (n = 51, 49%) (P<0.001). Staging data were available for 304 women with abnormal, and 77 with normal, CA125 levels. Of those with abnormal CA125 levels, 35% (n = 106) were diagnosed at an early stage, compared to 86% (n = 66) of women with normal levels. The odds of being diagnosed with early-stage disease were higher in women with normal as opposed to abnormal CA125 levels (odds ratio 12.2, 95% confidence interval = 5.8 to 25.1, P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Despite longer intervals between testing and diagnosis, women with normal, compared with abnormal, CA125 levels more frequently had indolent tumours and were more commonly diagnosed at an early stage in the course of the disease. Although testing approaches that have greater sensitivity might expedite diagnosis for some women, it is not known if this would translate to earlier-stage diagnosis.
© The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CA125; cancer antigen 125; diagnostic intervals; early diagnosis; general practice; ovarian cancer

Year:  2021        PMID: 33875416     DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  4 in total

1.  Detecting ovarian cancer in primary care: can we do better?

Authors:  Garth Funston; Emma J Crosbie; Willie Hamilton; Fiona M Walter
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.302

2.  The Performance of HE4 Alone and in Combination with CA125 for the Detection of Ovarian Cancer in an Enriched Primary Care Population.

Authors:  Chloe E Barr; Garth Funston; David Jeevan; Sudha Sundar; Luke T A Mounce; Emma J Crosbie
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Cancer metabolomics: A tool of clinical utility for early diagnosis of gynaecological cancers.

Authors:  Akshata Kishore Karekar; Sucheta Prakash Dandekar
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 5.274

Review 4.  Molecular Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Ruiqian Zhang; Michelle K Y Siu; Hextan Y S Ngan; Karen K L Chan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 6.208

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.