Literature DB >> 33874969

An examination of the barriers to and benefits from collaborative couple contraceptive use in Rwanda.

Hilary Schwandt1, Angel Boulware2, Julia Corey3, Ana Herrera4, Ethan Hudler5, Claudette Imbabazi6, Ilia King7, Jessica Linus8, Innocent Manzi6, Madelyn Merritt9, Lyn Mezier10, Abigail Miller9, Haley Morris11, Dieudonne Musemakweli6, Uwase Musekura12, Divine Mutuyimana6, Chimene Ntakarutimana13, Nirali Patel14, Adriana Scanteianu15, Biganette-Evidente Shemeza6, Madi Stapleton9, Gi'anna Sterling-Donaldson16, Chantal Umutoni6, Lyse Uwera6, Madeleine Zeiler9, Seth Feinberg9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Supportive male involvement is strongly correlated with contraceptive use. In Rwanda, where the contraceptive prevalence rate among married women increased from 17 to 52% from 2005 to 2010, and stagnated at 53% in 2015, understanding the role of male partners in collaborative couple contraceptive use can help inform programs designed to further increase the use of contraception in Rwanda.
METHODS: This study utilized qualitative methods in 2018, specifically 32 in-depth interviewers with mostly current users of modern contraceptive methods and eight focus group discussions with family planning providers-both family planning nurses and community health workers (CHWs). Respondents were from Musanze and Nyamasheke Districts, the districts with the highest and lowest modern contraceptive use, respectively, to explore the role of couple collaboration in family planning use in Rwanda. Data were analyzed using the thematic content approach in Atlas.ti (8).
RESULTS: Findings demonstrate that some men are opposed to use of male methods of contraception, and some are opposed to any contraceptive use, which can lead to covert use. Women and providers prefer collaborative couple contraceptive use-as a result, providers advocate for and encourage male partner participation in contraceptive use. Women are most often burdened with seeking out information, initiating discussions, and sharing information discovered about contraceptive use with partners. Decision-making about contraceptive use, once discussed, can be collaborative and motivated by financial considerations. When couple contraceptive use is collaborative, benefits range from marital harmony to husband's support of sustained use through reminders about appointments, joint counseling, and support in managing side effects.
CONCLUSION: Family planning providers at the community and clinic levels encourage collaborative contraceptive use among couples and some Rwandan couples communicate well about family planning use. Despite the positives, women are expected to source family planning information, share that information with their male partners, seek out family planning services, and use family planning. If more Rwandan male partners accepted use, used male methods of contraception, and participated even more in the work it takes to use family planning, the potential for sustained, and even enhanced, contraceptive use in Rwanda could be realized.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraception; Family planning; Male involvement; Rwanda; Spousal communication

Year:  2021        PMID: 33874969     DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01135-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Health        ISSN: 1742-4755            Impact factor:   3.223


  2 in total

1.  "Family planning in Rwanda is not seen as population control, but rather as a way to empower the people": examining Rwanda's success in family planning from the perspective of public and private stakeholders.

Authors:  Hilary M Schwandt; Seth Feinberg; Akrofi Akotiah; Tong Yuan Douville; Elliot V Gardner; Claudette Imbabazi; Erin McQuin; Maha Mohamed; Alexis Rugoyera; Diuedonné Musemakweli; Cliff Wes Nichols; Nelly Uwajeneza Nyangezi; Joshua Serrano Arizmendi; Doopashika Welikala; Benjamin Yamuragiye; Liliana Zigo
Journal:  Contracept Reprod Med       Date:  2018-11-20

2.  Barriers to male involvement in contraceptive uptake and reproductive health services: a qualitative study of men and women's perceptions in two rural districts in Uganda.

Authors:  Allen Kabagenyi; Larissa Jennings; Alice Reid; Gorette Nalwadda; James Ntozi; Lynn Atuyambe
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.223

  2 in total
  3 in total

1.  Family planning demand generation in Rwanda: Government efforts at the national and community level impact interpersonal communication and family norms.

Authors:  Julia Corey; Hilary Schwandt; Angel Boulware; Ana Herrera; Ethan Hudler; Claudette Imbabazi; Ilia King; Jessica Linus; Innocent Manzi; Madelyn Merrit; Lyn Mezier; Abigail Miller; Haley Morris; Dieudonne Musemakweli; Uwase Musekura; Divine Mutuyimana; Chimene Ntakarutimana; Nirali Patel; Adriana Scanteianu; Biganette-Evidente Shemeza; Gi'anna Sterling-Donaldson; Chantal Umutoni; Lyse Uwera; Madeleine Zeiler; Seth Feinberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Utilisation of modern contraceptives by sexually active adolescent girls in Rwanda: a nationwide cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Joseph Kawuki; Ghislaine Gatasi; Quraish Sserwanja; David Mukunya; Milton W Musaba
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  Perceptions of Partners' Fertility Preferences and Women's Covert Contraceptive Use in Eight Sub-Saharan African Countries.

Authors:  Dana O Sarnak; Alison Gemmill
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2022-06-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.