| Literature DB >> 36068524 |
Joseph Kawuki1, Ghislaine Gatasi2, Quraish Sserwanja3, David Mukunya4, Milton W Musaba5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Modern contraceptive use has been shown to influence population growth, protect women's health and rights, as well as prevent sexually transmitted infections (STIs) for barrier contraceptive methods such as condoms. The present study aimed at assessing the level of utilization and factors associated with modern contraceptive use among sexually active adolescent girls in Rwanda.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescents; Contraceptive use; Family planning; Rwanda
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36068524 PMCID: PMC9447358 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01956-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Womens Health ISSN: 1472-6874 Impact factor: 2.742
Background characteristics of Sexually active Rwandan adolescents aged 15 to 19 years as per the 2020 Rwanda demographic health survey
| Characteristics | Frequency (%), N = 539 |
|---|---|
| 15 | 39 (7.2) |
| 16 | 59 (10.9) |
| 17 | 104 (19.3) |
| 18 | 127 (23.5) |
| 19 | 210 (38.9) |
| Tertiary | 4 (0.7) |
| Secondary | 178 (33.0) |
| Primary | 342 (63.6) |
| No education | 15 (2.8) |
| Working | 294 (54.5) |
| Not working | 245 (45.5) |
| Living with partner | 73 (13.6) |
| Not in a union | 465 (86.4) |
| Catholic | 204(37.9) |
| Protestant | 242(45.0) |
| Others | 92(17.1) |
| Yes | 431 (79.9) |
| No | 108 (20.1) |
| Yes | 14 (2.6) |
| No | 524 (97.4) |
| Yes | 159 (29.6) |
| No | 379 (70.4) |
| Yes | 433 (80.5) |
| No | 105 (19.5) |
| Yes | 282 (52.3) |
| No | 257 (47.7) |
| Richest | 148 (27.5) |
| Richer | 92 (17.1) |
| Middle | 100 (18.6) |
| Poorer | 99 (18.4) |
| Poorest | 99 (18.4) |
| Less than 6 | 301 (55.9) |
| 6 and above | 237 (44.1) |
| Male | 361 (67.0) |
| Female | 178 (33.0) |
| Urban | 116 (21.6) |
| Rural | 422 (78.4) |
| Kigali | 83 (15.5) |
| West | 100 (18.6) |
| East | 172 (32.0) |
| North | 68 (12.6) |
| South | 115 (21.3) |
Types of modern contraceptives used by sexually active adolescent girls, as per 2020 RDHS
| Modern contraceptive use | Frequency (%), N = 539 |
|---|---|
| Yes | |
| No | 445 (82.6) |
| Type of contraceptive | Frequency (%), N = 94 |
| Implants/Norplant | 65 (69.1) |
| Male condom | 12 (12.8) |
| Injections | 9 (9.6) |
| Pills | 8 (8.5) |
CI confidence interval, RDHS Rwanda demographic health survey
Factors associated with modern contraceptive use among sexually active adolescent girls as per the 2020 RDHS
| Variable | Crude odds ratio, COR (95% CI) | Adjusted odds ratio, AOR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 16 | 2.97(0.32–27.90) | 2.88(0.29–28.31) | ||
| 17 | 6.37(0.78–52.09) | 5.76(0.70–47.43) | ||
| 18 | 9.29(1.198–72.069) | 7.41(0.93–58.85) | ||
| 19 | 13.50(1.77–103.06) | |||
| 0.269 | ||||
| No education | 1 | 1 | ||
| Primary | 1.26(0.32–5.02) | 1.88(0.38–9.37) | ||
| Secondary | 0.77(0.20–3.01) | 1.54(0.30–8.056) | ||
| Tertiary | 1.93(0.22–16.92) | |||
| 0.240 | ||||
| Not working | 1 | 1 | ||
| Working | 1.79(1.14–2.83) | 1.40(0.80–2.48) | ||
| Living with partner | 1 | 1 | ||
| Not in a union | 0.12(0.07–0.22) | |||
| 0.421 | 0456 | |||
| Catholic | 1 | 1 | ||
| Protestant | 1.09(0.64–1.86) | 1.22(0.67–2.23) | ||
| Others | 1.49(0.81–2.76) | 1.60(0.76–3.37) | ||
| 0.912 | 0.926 | |||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 1.03(0.60–1.78) | 0.98(0.47–1.97) | ||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 7.18(2.41–21.45) | |||
| 0.402 | 0.096 | |||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 1.22(0.77–1.94) | 1.68(0.913.09 | ||
| 0.084 | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 0.690(0.398–1.20) | 0.55(0.27–1.08) | ||
| 0.483 | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 0.56(0.35–0.90) | 0.79(0.41–1.53) | ||
| 0.099 | ||||
| Poorest | 1 | 1 | ||
| Poorer | 1.01(0.53–1.92) | 1.04(0.48–2.26) | ||
| Middle | 1.71(0.90–3.24) | 1.78(0.75–4.20) | ||
| Richer | 0.62(0.31–1.25) | 0.82(0.32–2.07) | ||
| Richest | 0.31(0.14–0.68) | 0.51(0.20–1.32) | ||
| 0.746 | ||||
| 6 and above | 1 | 1 | ||
| Less than 6 | 1.86(1.13–3.05) | 0.90(0.48–1.68) | ||
| 0.945 | ||||
| Male | 1 | 1 | 0.130 | |
| Female | 0.98(0.60–1.61) | 1.60(0.87–2.93) | ||
| Rural | 1 | 1 | 0.248 | |
| Urban | 0.651(0.36–1.17) | 1.54(0.74–3.19) | ||
| South | 1 | 1 | ||
| North | 1.28(0.64–2.56) | 1.42(0.58–3.44) | ||
| East | 1.25(0.70–2.25) | 1.23(0.61–2.48) | ||
| West | 0.62(0.26–1.52) | 0.57(0.23–1.40 | ||
| Kigali | 0.20(0.08–0.52) |
Bold = significant, * = significant at 0.25, ** = significant at 0.05, CI = confidence interval, RDHS = Rwanda demographic health survey
Sensitivity analysis, considering all adolescent girls, n = 3258
| Variable | Adjusted odds ratio, AOR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 4.71(0.52–42.57) | |
| 17 | ||
| 18 | ||
| 19 | ||
| 0.250 | ||
| No education | 1 | |
| Primary | 1.71(0.32–9.09) | |
| Secondary | 0.91(0.17–4.75) | |
| Tertiary | 5.08(0.61–42.32) | |
| Not working | 1 | |
| Working | ||
| Living with partner | 1 | |
| Not in a union | ||
| 0.405 | ||
| Catholic | 1 | |
| Protestant | 1.11(0.65–1.89) | |
| Others | 1.61(0.80–3.23) | |
| 0.395 | ||
| No | 1 | |
| Yes | 0.76(0.40–1.44) | |
| No | 1 | |
| Yes | ||
| 0.242 | ||
| No | 1 | |
| Yes | 1.37(0.81–2.34) | |
| 0.186 | ||
| No | 1 | |
| Yes | 0.65(0.34–1.23) | |
| 0.945 | ||
| No | 1 | |
| Yes | 0.98(0.55–1.76) | |
| 0.179 | ||
| Poorest | 1 | |
| Poorer | 1.17(0.51–2.68) | |
| Middle | 2.02(0.87–4.64) | |
| Richer | 1.23(0.52–2.95) | |
| Richest | 0.73(0.26–2.02) | |
| 0.843 | ||
| 6 and above | 1 | |
| Less than 6 | 1.06(0.58–1.94) | |
| Male | 1 | |
| Female | ||
| Rural | 1 | 0.353 |
| Urban | 1.37(0.70–2.70) | |
| South | 1 | |
| North | 1.02(0.46–2.27) | |
| East | 1.27(0.66–2.46) | |
| West | 0.53(0.23–1.21) | |
| Kigali |
Bold = significant, ** = significant at 0.05, CI = confidence interval