Literature DB >> 33871852

Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests.

Brendan J Barrett1, John M Fardy2.   

Abstract

As technology advances, diagnostic tests continue to improve and each year, we are presented with new alternatives to standard procedures. Given the plethora of diagnostic alternatives, diagnostic tests must be evaluated to determine their place in the diagnostic armamentarium. The first step involves determining the accuracy of the test, including the sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios for positive and negative tests, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The role of the test in a diagnostic pathway has then to be determined, following which the effect on patient outcome should be examined.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic tests; Likelihood ratio; Negative predictive value; Positive predictive value; Receiver operating characteristic curve; Sensitivity; Specificity

Year:  2021        PMID: 33871852     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  31 in total

1.  Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance.

Authors:  Afina S Glas; Jeroen G Lijmer; Martin H Prins; Gouke J Bonsel; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  The ability of rheumatologists blinded to prior workup to diagnose rheumatoid arthritis only by clinical assessment: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Boris Ehrenstein; Georg Pongratz; Martin Fleck; Wolfgang Hartung
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 4.  Quantifying the added value of a diagnostic test or marker.

Authors:  Karel G M Moons; Joris A H de Groot; Kristian Linnet; Johannes B Reitsma; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 5.  Beyond diagnostic accuracy: the clinical utility of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Patrick M M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; Kristian Linnet; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Quantifying the accuracy of a diagnostic test or marker.

Authors:  Kristian Linnet; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Karel G M Moons; Johannes B R Reitsma
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  Refining clinical diagnosis with likelihood ratios.

Authors:  David A Grimes; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Apr 23-29       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  ACCURACY OF THE LEVER SIGN TO DIAGNOSE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT TEAR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS.

Authors:  Michael P Reiman; Carly K Reiman; Simon Décary
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-08

10.  Faecal immunochemical tests versus colonoscopy for post-polypectomy surveillance: an accuracy, acceptability and economic study.

Authors:  Wendy Atkin; Amanda J Cross; Ines Kralj-Hans; Eilidh MacRae; Carolyn Piggott; Sheena Pearson; Kate Wooldrage; Jeremy Brown; Fiona Lucas; Aaron Prendergast; Natalie Marchevsky; Bhavita Patel; Kevin Pack; Rosemary Howe; Hanna Skrobanski; Robert Kerrison; Nicholas Swart; Julia Snowball; Stephen W Duffy; Stephen Morris; Christian von Wagner; Stephen Halloran
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.014

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.