A practical access to four new halogen-substituted pyrrole building blocks was realized in two to five synthetic steps from commercially available starting materials. The target compounds were prepared on a 50 mg to 1 g scale, and their conversion to nanomolar inhibitors of bacterial DNA gyrase B was demonstrated for three of the prepared building blocks to showcase the usefulness of such chemical motifs in medicinal chemistry.
A practical access to four new halogen-substituted pyrrole building blocks was realized in two to five synthetic steps from commercially available starting materials. The target compounds were prepared on a 50 mg to 1 g scale, and their conversion to nanomolar inhibitors of bacterial DNA gyrase B was demonstrated for three of the prepared building blocks to showcase the usefulness of such chemical motifs in medicinal chemistry.
Halogen-substituted
pyrrole-2-carboxamide is an integral molecular
fragment of bioactive marine natural products as well as natural and
synthetic anti-infectives (Figure ). In particular, mono- and dibromopyrrole-2-carboxamide
are found in oroidin[1] and hymenidin,[2] which are postulated precursors for structurally
diverse mono- and oligomeric secondary metabolites involved in the
chemical defense of Agelas marine sponges. A representative
compound ageliferin[3] features a complex
multichiral scaffold.[4] Furthermore, 3,4-dichloro-5-methyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxamide is a molecular fragment of natural[5,6] and synthetic[7] antibacterials, crucial
for binding to the active site of bacterial topoisomerases, and the
3-fluoro-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxamide moiety is found
in promising preclinical candidates, active against hepatitis B virus
(Figure ).[8]
Figure 1
Representative natural products and bioactive compounds
with a
halogen-doped 1H-pyrrole-2-carboxamide fragment.
Representative natural products and bioactive compounds
with a
halogen-doped1H-pyrrole-2-carboxamide fragment.During our ongoing research in the field of dual
bacterial DNA
gyrase/topoisomerase IV inhibitors,[9−15] a promising hit compound 1 (Figure ) was identified, displaying low nanomolar
inhibition of the target enzymes and broad-spectrum activity against
gram-positive bacterial strains.[16] Due
to the compound’s high lipophilicity, its more polar analogues 2–5 were designed by varying the 3,4-dichloro-5-methyl-1H-pyrrole moiety, envisioning improved physical properties
(c log P was calculated
by ChemDraw) of the analogues while retaining the on-target activity
(Figure ).
Figure 2
Design of antibacterial
hit compound analogues with decreased lipophilicity.
Design of antibacterial
hit compound analogues with decreased lipophilicity.With no preceding literature on the synthesis of the required
pyrrole
building blocks for the preparation of compounds 2–5, we report herein our synthetic endeavors, where the main
goal was the timely delivery of at least 100 mg of the sample to be
built into the bioactive molecules. The amide bond of the target compounds
can be formed using pyrrole-2-carbonyl chloride or 2-trichloroacetylpyrrole;
therefore, either would be an acceptable option.
Results
and Discussion
The literature procedure for the synthesis
of 4-chloro-5-methyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid
involves chlorination of ethyl
5-methyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate using N-chlorosuccinimide at 0 °C and required in our hands laborious
chromatographic separation of two barely resolved products.[17] The practical synthesis of an alternative acylating
agent 8 for the introduction of the same structural fragment
was thus developed (Scheme ). Trichloroacetylpyrrole 7 was prepared from
pyrrole-2-carbaldehyde 6 employing the Wolff–Kishner
reduction and Friedel–Crafts acylation.[18] It was then directly monochlorinated using N-chlorosuccinimide at r.t. and the pure product 8 was
obtained on the gram scale in 61% isolated yield after convenient
crystallization from dichloromethane. Its structure was unambiguously
determined by two-dimensional (2D) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)
experiments (Supporting Information), showing that the electrophilic
chlorination was selective for the position next to the electron-donating
methyl substituent.
Scheme 1
Synthesis of 2-Trichloroacetyl-4-chloro-5-methyl-1H-pyrrole 8
Reagents and conditions:
(a)
NH2NH2·H2O, ethylene glycol,
90 °C, 1 h, then KOH, 90 °C, 2.5 h (70% yield); (b) CCl3COCl, Et2O, r.t., 2 h (60% yield); and (c) N-chlorosuccinimide, dichloromethane, r.t., 4 h (61% yield).
Synthesis of 2-Trichloroacetyl-4-chloro-5-methyl-1H-pyrrole 8
Reagents and conditions:
(a)
NH2NH2·H2O, ethylene glycol,
90 °C, 1 h, then KOH, 90 °C, 2.5 h (70% yield); (b) CCl3COCl, Et2O, r.t., 2 h (60% yield); and (c) N-chlorosuccinimide, dichloromethane, r.t., 4 h (61% yield).Next, we targeted the 4-fluoro-substituted building
block. The
screening of different halogen exchange (“Halex”) conditions
involving crown ether 18-C-6 and [2.2.2]cryptand, for the conversion
of chloropyrrole 8 or ethyl 4-chloro-5-methylpyrrole-2-carboxylate
to the corresponding arylfluorides, returned no hits.[19] We thus resorted to electrophilic fluorination of ethyl
5-methyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate 9 (Scheme ). Initial 0.5 mmol
scale screening of the reaction conditions (Table S1 in the Supporting Information) revealed that Selectfluor-mediated
fluorination[20] outperformed the N-fluorobenzenesulfonimide (NFSI)-mediated Lewis acid-catalyzed
fluorination,[21] as the former resulted
in somewhat cleaner conversions. When the fluorination was performed
at 0 °C in a mixture of acetonitrile and acetic acid (Table S2, entries 11 and 12), the formation of
target compound 10, accompanied by an acetoxy side product 11, was observed. Their structures were confirmed by single-crystal
X-ray diffraction analysis (Figures S1 and S2 in the Supporting Information). Aiming for an efficient med–chem
synthetic route, the reaction was performed on a 2 g scale (Scheme ), delivering 10 in a consistent 4.5–6.5% yield after flash chromatography.
Ester 10 was hydrolyzed to acid 12, requiring
rather forcing conditions, and acyl chloride 13 was finally
formed using oxalyl chloride in dichloromethane. It is noteworthy
that acyl chloride formation using refluxing sulfonyl chloride or
oxalyl chloride with the catalytic quantity of dimethylformamide (DMF)
resulted in the formation of a significant amount of unidentified
side products.
Scheme 2
Synthesis of 4-Fluoro-5-methyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carbonyl
Chloride 13
Reagents and conditions: (a)
Selectfluor, MeCN/AcOH 5:1, 0 °C, 2 h (6.5% yield); (b) 10 M
NaOH (aq), EtOH, 90 °C, 3 h (76% yield); and (c) oxalyl chloride,
dichloromethane, r.t., overnight (quant. yield).
Synthesis of 4-Fluoro-5-methyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carbonyl
Chloride 13
Reagents and conditions: (a)
Selectfluor, MeCN/AcOH 5:1, 0 °C, 2 h (6.5% yield); (b) 10 M
NaOH (aq), EtOH, 90 °C, 3 h (76% yield); and (c) oxalyl chloride,
dichloromethane, r.t., overnight (quant. yield).Ethyl 3-fluoro-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate 14 has recently become commercially available at a reasonable
price because it is a key building block for a drug candidate against
hepatitis B virus.[22] This was a good starting
point for the synthesis of 3-fluoro-5-methyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylic
acid 18 (Scheme ). The Vilsmeier–Haack formylation of 14 gave at 68% conversion a 43:57 mixture of 4- and 5-formylated regioisomers 16 and 15, which were separated by flash chromatography.
The regioisomers’ identity was assigned by 19F NMR
as follows: 4-formyl isomer 16 features a singlet and
5-formyl isomer 15 features a doublet, 3JF,H = 4 Hz, confirming the presence of a vicinal
proton. Moreover, the 13C NMR peak of the formyl carbon
of 15 is a singlet and that of 16 is a doublet, 3JC,F = 2.8 Hz.
Scheme 3
Synthesis of 3-Fluoro-5-methyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carbonyl
Chloride 19
Reagents and conditions: (a)
DMF, POCl3, 0 °C, 30 min, then 14, 90
°C, overnight (25% yield); (b) Zn, 4 M HCl/dioxane, r.t., 40
min (20% yield); (c) 10 M NaOH(aq), EtOH, 90 °C, 5 h (82% yield);
and (d) oxalyl chloride, dichloromethane, r.t., overnight (quant.
yield).
Synthesis of 3-Fluoro-5-methyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carbonyl
Chloride 19
Reagents and conditions: (a)
DMF, POCl3, 0 °C, 30 min, then 14, 90
°C, overnight (25% yield); (b) Zn, 4 M HCl/dioxane, r.t., 40
min (20% yield); (c) 10 M NaOH(aq), EtOH, 90 °C, 5 h (82% yield);
and (d) oxalyl chloride, dichloromethane, r.t., overnight (quant.
yield).Based on the literature reports on
the reduction of ester-containing
formylpyrroles to methylpyrroles,[23] we
first attempted a BH3·THF-mediated reduction of 15–17, which in this case yielded the
intermediate alcohol; no full reduction was observed even after several
days of stirring with periodical addition of excess BH3·THF. Other literature reports on aldehyde-to-methyl reduction
in the presence of ester include a two-step Mozingo protocol via thioketal.[24] Aiming to secure a convenient one-pot procedure,
we opted for the modified Clemmensen reduction.[25] A dioxane-soluble [ZnCl2(dioxane)2] complex[26] was prepared by treating zinc
dust with anhydrous 4 M HCl in dioxane. This proved to be a very efficient
and reasonably selective reduction medium, delivering 17 after 40 min at r.t. in 20% isolated yield. Optimization of the
reaction conditions and elucidation of the mechanism is beyond the
aim of this study; however, we speculate that a dioxane-soluble Zn(II)
species forms a zinc–ylide intermediate more efficiently compared
to the classical heterogeneous Clemmensen reduction (Zn/Hg/HCl/H2O), allowing the reaction to proceed at room temperature.[27] The side products are essentially a result of
the zinc–ylide reaction with other present electrophiles (ester,
aldehyde, and arylfluoride). Using the conditions developed for the
synthesis of 13, ester 17 was readily transformed
to acyl chloride 19.Ethyl 5-chloromethyl-3,4-dichloro-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate 21 was prepared from
commercially available 20 according to the literature
procedure (Scheme ).[18] After conversion
to azide 22 by KI-mediated nucleophilic substitution,
the reduction of 22 to amine 23 was first
attempted via Pd/C-catalyzed hydrogenation. This resulted in significant
side-product formation, possibly via the nucleophilic attack of amine 23 to the electrophilic methylene moiety of 22, and aryl dehalogenation, as apparent from the 1H NMR
analysis of the crude reaction mixture. Avoiding the coexistence of
amine and azide species during the reaction, we resorted to the milder
Staudinger reduction,[28] which furnished
amine 23 in 78% isolated yield. Saponification to 24, followed by phthalimide protection in neat phthalic anhydride
gave 25 with 41% yield over four steps from 21.
Scheme 4
Synthesis of 3,4-Dichloro-5-phthalimidomethyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylic Acid 25
Reagents
and conditions: (a)
SO2Cl2, CCl4, −5 °C,
5 h; (b) NaN3, KI (cat.), DMF, r.t., 1.5 h (95% yield);
(c) PPh3, H2O/THF, r.t., 2.5 h (78% yield);
(d) 10 M NaOH, EtOH, 90 °C, 4 h (quant. yield); and (e) phthalic
anhydride, 130–180 °C, 1 h (55% yield).
Synthesis of 3,4-Dichloro-5-phthalimidomethyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylic Acid 25
Reagents
and conditions: (a)
SO2Cl2, CCl4, −5 °C,
5 h; (b) NaN3, KI (cat.), DMF, r.t., 1.5 h (95% yield);
(c) PPh3, H2O/THF, r.t., 2.5 h (78% yield);
(d) 10 M NaOH, EtOH, 90 °C, 4 h (quant. yield); and (e) phthalic
anhydride, 130–180 °C, 1 h (55% yield).To showcase the usefulness of the prepared building blocks
in medicinal
chemistry, the synthesis of compound 5, the analogue
of antibacterial hit compound 1, was tackled (Scheme ). After the smooth
coupling of the acyl chloride, prepared from 25 in neat
thionyl chloride, with the 2-aminobenzothiazole building block[29] in refluxing toluene, the deprotection step
required some special attention. The formation of stable hydrazinium
salt 27 was observed during the phthalimide deprotection,
arguably due to the electron-withdrawing character of dichloropyrrole,
which increases the acidity of the neighboring amides. It was crucial
to first reprotonate the nitrogens of 27 to achieve complete
deprotection after refluxing in ethanol overnight. Alkaline hydrolysis
of phthalic hydrazide salt 28 yielded phthalate salt 29 and the anion was readily exchanged to the chloride salt
of 5 by trituration with methanolic HCl.
Scheme 5
Synthesis
of DNA Gyrase B Inhibitor 5·HCl
Reagents
and conditions: (a)
SOCl2, 75 °C, 1 h (quant. yield); (b) methyl 2-amino-4-benzyloxybenzo[d]thiazole-6-carboxylate, toluene, 130 °C, 24 h (81%
yield); (c) NH2NH2·H2O, EtOH,
50 °C, 40 min; (d) HCl, MeOH, r.t., 15 min; (e) EtOH, 80 °C,
18 h (88% yield from 26); (f) 4 M KOH, EtOH, 50 °C,
24 h then 1 M HCl to pH = 9; and (g) HCl, MeOH, r.t. (55% yield from 28).
Synthesis
of DNA Gyrase B Inhibitor 5·HCl
Reagents
and conditions: (a)
SOCl2, 75 °C, 1 h (quant. yield); (b) methyl 2-amino-4-benzyloxybenzo[d]thiazole-6-carboxylate, toluene, 130 °C, 24 h (81%
yield); (c) NH2NH2·H2O, EtOH,
50 °C, 40 min; (d) HCl, MeOH, r.t., 15 min; (e) EtOH, 80 °C,
18 h (88% yield from 26); (f) 4 M KOH, EtOH, 50 °C,
24 h then 1 M HCl to pH = 9; and (g) HCl, MeOH, r.t. (55% yield from 28).Antibacterial hit compound 1 (c log P = 5.8) inhibited Escherichia coliDNA gyrase with IC50 < 10 nM, and compound 5 (c log P = 2.0)
inhibited the same enzyme with IC50 < 10 nM. Moreover, 5 exhibits activity against Staphylococcus
aureus (ATCC29213) with a minimal inhibitory concentration
of 1 μg/mL. This confirms the hypothesis that the single-digit
nanomolar inhibitory on-target activity coupled to the antibacterial
activity can be retained while significantly reducing the lipophilicity
by the modification of the pyrrole moiety.To explore the reactivity
and bioactivity of the fluorinatedpyrroles,
two additional analogues of 1 were prepared (Scheme ) and evaluated for
their on-target and antibacterial activities. Thus, compounds 31 and 33 inhibited E. coliDNA gyrase with IC50 values of 32 and 150 nM, respectively,
and possessed weak activity against S. aureus (ATCC29213) (31: MIC = 64 μg/mL; 33: MIC > 64 μg/mL).
Scheme 6
Synthesis of DNA Gyrase B Inhibitors 31 and 33
Reagents and conditions:
(a)
methyl 2-amino-4-(1-phenylethoxy)benzo[d]thiazole-6-carboxylate,
toluene, 130 °C, 24 h (57% yield); (b) MeOH, 2 M NaOH, 40 °C,
48 h; (c) tert-butyl 2-amino-4-(2-propyloxy)benzo[d]thiazole-6-carboxylate, toluene, 130 °C, 24 h (79%
yield); and (d) CF3COOH, DCM, r.t., 24 h (98% yield).
Synthesis of DNA Gyrase B Inhibitors 31 and 33
Reagents and conditions:
(a)
methyl 2-amino-4-(1-phenylethoxy)benzo[d]thiazole-6-carboxylate,
toluene, 130 °C, 24 h (57% yield); (b) MeOH, 2 M NaOH, 40 °C,
48 h; (c) tert-butyl 2-amino-4-(2-propyloxy)benzo[d]thiazole-6-carboxylate, toluene, 130 °C, 24 h (79%
yield); and (d) CF3COOH, DCM, r.t., 24 h (98% yield).
Conclusions
In summary,
practical synthetic routes to four new halogen-dopedpyrrole building blocks were developed, delivering the target compounds
in sufficient quantities for further elaboration. Moreover, the transformation
of the building blocks to potent DNA gyrase B inhibitors was demonstrated.
Such building blocks are polar alternatives to molecular fragments
found in naturally occurring or natural-product-inspired bioactive
compounds and are useful in hit-to-lead optimization.
Experimental Section
General
Reactions
were conducted
under an inert atmosphere using anhydrous solvents when required.
Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on silica
gel 60 F254 plates. Flash column chromatography was performed
using silica gel 60 (40–63 μm). Melting points were determined
on a Kofler apparatus and are uncorrected. 1H NMR (400
MHz, internal Me4Si), 13C NMR (101 MHz, internal
CDCl3 or DMSO-d6), and 19F NMR (376 MHz, external CCl3F) spectra were recorded
on a Bruker AVANCE III 400 spectrometer (Bruker Corporation, Billerica,
MA) in a DMSO-d6 or CDCl3 solution.
HRMS analysis was performed on a VG Analytical Autospec Q mass spectrometer
(Fisons, VG Analytical, Manchester, U.K.).
A mixture of 2-trichloroacetyl-5-methyl-1H-pyrrole (2.14 g, 9.44 mmol), N-chlorosuccinimide
(1.26 g, 9.44 mmol), and dichloromethane (9.0 mL) was stirred at r.t.
overnight. The reaction mixture was partitioned between EtOAc (50
mL) and water (50 mL), and the organic layer was washed with water
and brine, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated.
The residue was recrystallized from dichloromethane to get the title
compound as white crystals (1.51 g, 61% yield). Mp 140–142
°C (DCM). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ
10.37 (s, 1H), 7.31 (d, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H), 2.41 (s,
2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 172.89,
137.01, 121.03, 119.78, 114.13, 94.87, 11.37. HRMS calcd for C7H4ONCl4 [M – H]− 257.90525, found 257.90521.
To a solution of
ethyl 5-methyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (2.00 g,
13.1 mmol) in acetonitrile (360 mL) and AcOH (72 mL) at 0 °C
was added Selectfluor (9.25 g, 26.1 mmol), and the mixture was stirred
at 0 °C for 2 h (full conversion by 1H NMR). The reaction
mixture was partitioned between water (500 mL) and dichloromethane
(500 mL), and the organic layer was washed with sat. NaHCO3 (aq) and brine, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated
to get the crude product. Crude products from two 2 g runs were combined
and purified by flash chromatography, eluent hexane/EtOAc 4:1, to
get the title compound (first eluting) as a colorless amorphous solid
(288 mg, 6.5% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.92 (bs, 1H), 6.54 (d, 1H, J = 4.0 Hz),
4.30 (q, 2H, J = 7.1 Hz), 2.24 (s, 3H), 1.34 (t,
3H, J = 7.1 Hz). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.3 (d, J = 3.3 Hz), 148.9 (d, J = 238.7 Hz), 117.6, 116.2 (d, J = 7.4
Hz), 102.3 (d, J = 15.6 Hz), 60.6, 14.6, 9.4 (d, J = 2.1 Hz). 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ −166.4. HRMS calcd for C8H11FNO2 [M + H]+ 172.0768, found 172.0769. This
procedure was repeated several times, consistently yielding 4.5–6.5%
of the title compound. A monocrystal suitable for single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis was grown from dichloromethane/hexane.
A solution of the above ester 10 (280 mg, 1.07 mmol) in abs. EtOH (15 mL) and 10 M NaOH
(3.0 mL) was stirred at 90 °C under an argon atmosphere for 3
h, and then the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure.
The residue was acidified to pH = 3 by adding 4 M HCl, and the precipitate
was collected, washed with water, and air-dried to get the title compound
as a light brown amorphous solid (177 mg, 76% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.25
(s, 1H), 11.51 (s, 1H), 6.45 (dd, J = 2.9, 1.1 Hz,
1H), 2.13 (s, 3H). 19F NMR (376 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ −167.66 to −167.70 (m). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ
161.51 (d, J = 3.3 Hz), 147.77 (d, J = 235.0 Hz), 116.90 (d, J = 25.1 Hz), 116.15 (d, J = 7.3 Hz), 100.94 (d, J = 14.9 Hz), 8.70
(d, J = 2.2 Hz). HRMS calcd for C6H5O2NF [M – H]−142.03098,
found 142.03001.
A suspension of the above acid
(75 mg, 0.52 mmol) in dry dichloromethane (5.2 mL) and oxalyl chloride
(0.45 mL, 5.2 mmol) was stirred at r.t. overnight. The resulting clear
solution was concentrated under reduced pressure to get the title
compound as a light brown amorphous solid (quant. yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.66 (s, 1H), 6.83 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 2.30 (s, 3H). 19F NMR shows
no clearly identifiable peak.
Ethyl
3-Fluoro-5-formyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (15) and Ethyl 3-Fluoro-4-formyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate
(16)
To DMF
(8.9 mL, 115 mmol) at 0 °C under Ar was added POCl3 (1.95 mL, 21.0 mmol). After stirring at 0 °C for 30 min, a
solution of ethyl 3-fluoro-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate 14 (3.00 g, 19.1 mmol) in DMF (29 mL) was added, and the resulting
solution was stirred at 90 °C overnight. The reaction mixture
was cooled to r.t. and poured onto ice (100 mL), the pH was adjusted
to 9 by adding 2 M NaOH (aq) and the product was extracted to Et2O (3 × 200 mL). The combined organic layers were washed
with brine, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated
to get the crude product, containing 14, 5-formylated
(15), and 4-formylated product (16) in a
42:34:24 ratio (by 1H NMR). The three compounds were separated
by column chromatography, eluent dichloromethane, then hexane/EtOAc
2:1 to yield 14 (983 mg, a white amorphous solid), 15 (869 mg, 25% yield, an orange amorphous solid), and 16 (724 mg, a yellow amorphous solid).Compound 15: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ
9.88 (s, 1H), 9.42 (br s, 1H), 7.36 (app t, J = 3.9
Hz, 1H), 4.39 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.39 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ −150.04 (d, J = 4 Hz). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 183.57, 160.22 (d, J = 3.5 Hz), 152.93 (d, J = 269.6 Hz),
124.59 (d, J = 3.6 Hz), 115.00 (d, J = 8.5 Hz), 109.40 (d, J = 18.1 Hz), 61.48, 14.35.
HRMS calcd for C8H9O3NF [M + H]+ 186.05610, found 186.05611.Compound 16: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.59 (s,
1H), 9.47 (s, 1H), 6.71–6.54 (m,
1H), 4.41 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.40 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ
−146.95. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ
180.38 (d, J = 2.8 Hz), 159.67 (d, J = 3.9 Hz), 153.06 (d, J = 260.3 Hz), 129.65 (d, J = 4.4 Hz), 113.90 (d, J = 20.0 Hz), 105.40
(d, J = 14.2 Hz), 61.75, 14.32.
To a solution of
the above aldehyde 15 (500 mg, 2.70 mmol) in 4 M HCl
in dioxane (27 mL) was added Zn dust (1.78 g, 27.0 mmol) portionwise
at room temperature over 2 min. The reaction is slightly exothermic
and performs better if no external cooling is applied. After 40 min
(full conversion by TLC), the reaction mixture was concentrated under
reduced pressure and filtered through a plug of silica, eluting with
EtOAc (200 mL), and concentrated to 5 mL, and the colorless crystals
were filtered off and washed with EtOAc (1H NMR analysis
revealed only a dioxane peak; it is likely a dioxane-soluble [ZnCl(dioxane)] complex
involved in the aldehyde reduction). The filtrate was diluted with
EtOAc (200 mL), washed with water (2 × 100 mL), NaHCO3 (100 mL), and brine, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated
to get the crude product (486 mg), containing 30 mol % of the desired
product (by 19F NMR). The pure 17 was isolated
by flash chromatography on silica, eluent hexane/EtOAc 4:1 (first
eluting compound) as a colorless oil containing residual EtOAc (by 1H NMR) (94 mg, 20% yield) and was used as such in the next
step. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.32 (br
s, 1H), 6.58 – 6.51 (m, 1H), 4.33 (q, J =
7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.02 (s, 3H), 1.36 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ −154.53
(d, J = 4.7 Hz). HRMS calcd for C8H11O2NF [M + H]+ 172.07683, found 172.07625.
A solution of the above ester 17 (80 mg, 0.47 mmol) in abs. EtOH (3.5 mL) and 10 M NaOH
(0.63 mL) was heated at 90 °C under Ar for 2 h, and then it was
concentrated under reduced pressure. The oily residue was dissolved
in water (2 mL), and 4 M HCl (1.6 mL) was added. The obtained precipitate
was collected, washed with water, and air-dried to get the title compound
as a white amorphous powder (55 mg, 82% yield). 1H NMR
(400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.32 (s, 1H),
11.25 (s, 1H), 6.66 (app t, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 1.93
(s, 3H). 19F NMR (376 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ −156.45. 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 160.49 (d, J = 3.5
Hz), 152.39 (d, J = 252.4 Hz), 119.46 (d, J = 6.4 Hz), 106.77 (d, J = 18.3 Hz), 105.46
(d, J = 13.9 Hz), 7.26. HRMS calcd. for C6H7O2NF [M + H]+ 144.04553, found
144.04552.
A suspension of the above acid 18 (50 mg, 0.35 mmol) in dry dichloromethane (3.5 mL) and
oxalyl chloride (0.3 mL, 3.5 mmol) was stirred at r.t. overnight.
The resulting clear solution was concentrated under reduced pressure
to get the title compound as a light brown amorphous solid (quant.
yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.51
(br s, 1H), 6.81–6.76 (m, 1H), 2.04 (d, J =
0.9 Hz, 3H). 19F NMR showed no clearly identifiable peak.
To a
solution of ethyl 5-(chloromethyl)-3,4-dichloro-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate 21 (2.00 g, 7.80 mmol) in DMF
(16 mL) was added NaN3 (1.00 g, 15.6 mmol), followed by
KI (130 mg, 0.78 mmol). The resulting suspension was vigorously stirred
at r.t. for 1.5 h, and then it was poured into water (100 mL). The
white precipitate was collected, washed with water, and air-dried
to yield the title compound as a white amorphous powder (1.95 g, 95%
yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.57
(s, 1H), 4.45 (s, 2H), 4.40 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H),
1.41 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101
MHz, CDCl3) δ 160.08, 126.48, 118.30, 117.72, 113.26,
61.66, 45.22, 14.45. HRMS calcd for C8H7O2N4Cl2 [M – H]− 260.99515, found 260.99529.
To a
solution of the above azide 22 (1.70 g, 6.46 mmol) in
THF/H2O 10:1 (35 mL) was added PPh3 (3.39 g,
12.9 mmol) at r.t. The resulting amber solution was stirred at r.t.
(caution: gas evolution) for 2.5 h, and then it was concentrated under
reduced pressure. The oily residue was partitioned between EtOAc (200
mL) and 0.5 M HCl (300 mL). The water layer was brought to pH = 11
by adding 2 M NaOH. The precipitate was collected, washed with water,
and dried in vacuo to yield the title compound as a white amorphous
powder (1.20 g, 78%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.87 (s, 1H), 4.36 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H),
3.99 (s, 2H), 1.63 (s, 2H), 1.38 (t, J = 7.1 Hz,
3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 160.16,
133.16, 117.50, 116.76, 110.24, 61.02, 36.85, 14.49. HRMS calcd for
C8H9O2N2Cl2 [M – H]− 235.00466, found 235.00459.
A mixture of
the above ester 23 (1.42 g, 6.00 mmol), abs. EtOH (60
mL), and 10 M NaOH (10.8 mL) was stirred at 90 °C under argon
for 3 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure,
dissolved in water (20 mL), filtered through cotton, and cooled to
0 °C. Conc. HCl(aq) (7.5 mL) was added, followed by 2 M HCl to
adjust the pH to 8. The precipitate was collected, washed with water,
and air-dried to yield the title compound as a white amorphous powder
(1.3 g, quant. yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 3.91 (s, 2H). HRMS calcd for C6H5O2N2Cl2 [M – H]− 206.97336, found 206.97342.
A
homogeneous mixture of the above amino acid 24 (300 mg,
1.44 mmol) and powdered phthalic anhydride (213 mg, 1.44 mmol) in
a 25 mL round-bottom flask was heated on an oil bath under a stream
of argon from 150 to 180 °C for 15 min while stirring with a
magnetic stirrer at 100 rpm and agitating the flask manually. The
temperature was kept at 180 °C for 30 min during which the reaction
mixture caked. After cooling to r.t., the crude product was triturated
successively with dichloromethane, EtOAc, and 1 M HCl, washed with
water, and air-dried to get the title compound as a light gray amorphous
solid (270 mg, 55% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 13.04 (s, 1H), 12.57 (s, 1H), 8.01–7.76
(m, 4H), 4.79 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 167.31, 160.04, 134.42, 131.83, 127.18, 123.14,
117.38, 114.98, 109.12, 33.00. HRMS calcd for C14H7O4N2Cl2 [M – H]− 336.97884, found 336.97929.
A suspension
of the above carboxylic acid 25 (110 mg, 0.324 mmol)
in SOCl2 (1 mL) was refluxed for 1 h and then concentrated
under reduced pressure. To the solid residue were added methyl 2-amino-4-(benzyloxy)benzo[d]thiazole-6-carboxylate (102 mg, 0.324 mg) and normal grade
toluene (6.5 mL), and the resulting suspension was refluxed overnight.
After cooling to r.t., the precipitate was collected, washed with
toluene, and air-dried to get the title compound as a gray amorphous
solid (165 mg, 81% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.44 (s, 1H), 12.39 (s, 1H), 8.30
(s, 1H), 7.95–7.85 (m, 4H), 7.61 (s, 1H), 7.55–7.50
(m, 2H), 7.46–7.34 (m, 3H), 5.30 (s, 2H), 4.82 (s, 2H), 3.88
(s, 3H). HRMS calcd for C30H19O6N4Cl2S [M – H]− 633.04078,
found 633.04098.
A mixture of the above ester 28 (50 mg, 0.075 mmol),
abs. EtOH (1.0 mL), and 4 M KOH (0.15 mL) was stirred at 80 °C
for 2 h and then at 50 °C overnight. The reaction mixture was
concentrated, water (1 mL) was added, and the solids were filtered
off. The filtrate was brought to pH = 6 by adding 1 M HCl and cooled
to 0 °C. The amorphous precipitate was collected, washed with
water, and air-dried. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.18 (s, 1H), 8.08 (s, 2H), 7.96–7.82
(m, 3H), 7.60–7.50 (m, 3H), 7.48–7.31 (m, 3H), 5.30
(s, 2H), 3.94 (s, 2H), exchangeable protons were not observed.
The above phthalate salt 29 was triturated
with a fresh
solution of HCl in MeOH (2 × 1 mL) (prepared by adding two drops
of 37% HCl (aq) to absolute methanol (5 mL) (methanol was chosen as
a solvent because of the known good solubility of phthalic acid in
methanol)) to get the title compound as a brown amorphous powder (22
mg, 55% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 13.05 (s, 1H), 12.64 (s, 1H), 12.47 (s, 1H),
8.39–8.20 (m, 4H), 7.64 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 1H),
7.55 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.47–7.42 (m, 2H),
7.41–7.36 (m, 1H), 5.33 (s, 2H), 4.07 (q, J = 5 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) representative peaks: δ 167.46, 137.04, 128.91,
128.76, 128.58, 127.47, 125.72, 116.82, 115.03, 112.68, 109.63, 70.58,
33.42. HRMS calcd for C21H17O4N4Cl2S [M – Cl]+ 491.0348, found
491.0334.
The above tert-butyl
ester 32 (75 mg, 0.173 mmol) was suspended in dichloromethane
(3 mL). Trifluoroacetic acid (0.13 mL, 1.73 mmol) was added and the
suspension turned into a brown solution. The reaction mixture was
stirred overnight at room temperature. The solvent was removed under
reduced pressure and the residue was triturated with methanol to give 33 as an amorphous solid. Yield: 98% (64 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.92
(s, 1H), 12.65 (s, 1H), 11.84 (s, 1H), 8.17 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (s, 1H), 7.26 (d, J = 2.7 Hz,
1H), 4.89 (hept, J = 6 Hz, 1H), 2.19 (s, 3H), 1.36
(d, J = 6 Hz, 6H). HRMS calcd for C17H17O4N3FS [M + H]+ 378.09183,
found 378.09203.
Biological Assays
Determination of Inhibitory
Activity on E. coli. DNA Gyrase
The supercoiling
assay for
the determination of IC50 values was performed according
to previously reported procedures.[30]
Authors: Brian A Sherer; Kenneth Hull; Oluyinka Green; Gregory Basarab; Sheila Hauck; Pamela Hill; James T Loch; George Mullen; Shanta Bist; Joanna Bryant; Ann Boriack-Sjodin; Jon Read; Nancy DeGrace; Maria Uria-Nickelsen; Ruth N Illingworth; Ann E Eakin Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Andrej E Cotman; Marko Trampuž; Matjaž Brvar; Danijel Kikelj; Janez Ilaš; Lucija Peterlin-Mašič; Sofia Montalvão; Päivi Tammela; Rok Frlan Journal: Arch Pharm (Weinheim) Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 3.751