Xiao-He Yu1, Jian Huang1, Nai-Jian Ge1, Ye-Fa Yang1, Jin-Yan Zhao2. 1. Department of Radioactive Intervention, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China. 2. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China. jingy1213@163.com.
Keywords:
Case report; Immunohistology; Pembrolizumab; Programmed cell death protein 1; Tumor mutation burden; Undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver
Core Tip: Undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver is a neoplasm rarely diagnosed in adults, which was mainly treated by resection and adjuvant multiagent chemotherapy. Immunotherapy, such as antibody of programmed cell death protein 1, has not been reported to be used to treat this disease. Here we reported a recurrent undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver case in an adult that was treated by pembrolizumab and discussed the way to find the proper candidates for antibody of programmed cell death protein 1 treatment.
INTRODUCTION
Undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver (UESL) is a mesenchymal tumor that was first described in 1978[1]. UESL is an aggressive pediatric tumor that is classically diagnosed in adolescents and rarely diagnosed in adults[2]. The main treatments for UESL are upfront gross total surgical resection and adjuvant multiagent chemo-therapy, which have led to improved long-term survival[3]. However, immunotherapy, such programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) antibodies, has not been reported to be used to treat this disease. Here, we report a case of recurrent UESL in an adult treated with pembrolizumab (Keytruda, Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd) and discuss a method to identify proper candidates for anti-PD-1 treatment.
CASE PRESENTATION
Chief complaints
A 69-year-old woman was admitted for abdominal pain that developed for 1 wk (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Timeline of the case. PET-CT: Positron emission tomography-computed tomography; PTCD: Percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage.
Timeline of the case. PET-CT: Positron emission tomography-computed tomography; PTCD: Percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage.
History of present illness
Right hemihepatectomy and lymphadenectomy were performed in Oct 2016.
History of past illness
She had no history of a previously diagnosed malignancy.
Physical examination
No abnormalities.
Laboratory examinations
Serum levels of tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen, CA-19-9, alpha-fetoprotein and prostate-specific antigen) were all within normal limits, and she was negative for hepatic viral markers (hepatitis B surface antigen and anti-hepatitis C virus).
Imaging examinations
Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed a 16 cm mass in the right lobe of the liver, and positron emission tomography-CT showed radioactive concentration of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose on the tumor rim with no radioactive concentration in other areas of the body (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Positron emission tomography-computed tomography. A-C: Radioactive concentration of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose on the tumor rim, and no radioactive concentration was observed in other areas of the body.
Positron emission tomography-computed tomography. A-C: Radioactive concentration of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose on the tumor rim, and no radioactive concentration was observed in other areas of the body.
FINAL DIAGNOSIS
The histological report showed a solitary 16.0 cm × 12.5 cm × 10.5 cm well-defined and encapsulated tumor. Tumor cells were found in some dilated lymph vessels. The immunohistological stain was positive for vimentin, S-100 protein, A1AT, LCA, CD68 and Ki67. The staining for CD20, CD45R0, CK, CAM5.2, smooth muscle actin, CK8/18, CK20, CK19, villin, AFP, HSA, HMB45, A103, TTF-1, CA125, caldesmon, MyoD1, CD34, CD21 and CD57 demonstrated negative findings. The diagnosis of UESL was made using the examinations mentioned above.
TREATMENT
Six months after surgery, the patient suffered from painless obstructive jaundice. Liver ultrasonography revealed a new lesion near the hepatic hilum and intrahepatic bile duct dilation. Then, positron emission tomography-CT revealed multiple metastases located in the liver, mediastinum and peritoneum (Figure 3). Next, percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage and stenting were applied to reduce jaundice. After that, radiofrequency ablation with intraductal chilled saline perfusion to prevent bile duct injury through percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage was used to control the lesion near the hepatic hilum[4]. However, the patient suffered from a serious fever caused by the tumor. Due to the fever, the patient became asthenic and was afraid to undergo chemotherapy or targeted therapy. Therefore, the patient was received pembrolizumab for treatment, and the prescribed dosage was 2 mg/kg once every 3 wk.
Figure 3
Positron emission tomography-computed tomography. A-D: Multiple metastases located in the liver, mediastinum and peritoneum.
Positron emission tomography-computed tomography. A-D: Multiple metastases located in the liver, mediastinum and peritoneum.
OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP
Two days after the first dose, the fever was relieved. After the seventh dose, new positron emission tomography-CT was conducted revealing that the multiple metastases had nearly disappeared (Figure 4). The patient received six more doses of pembrolizumab. Every 6 mo, chest CT and abdominal contrast-enhanced CT were used to evaluate the disease state, and no new lesions were found. To determine the reason why the patient had such a favorable response to pembrolizumab, biopsy and peripheral blood were used for next-generation sequencing (NGS). NGS revealed PTK2 gene amplification, FGF10 gene amplification and USP34/XPO1 gene rearrangement. The tumor mutation burden (TMB) was 3.2 muts/Mb (< 75%), and the tumor showed microsatellite stability. There was no strong association between the favorable response and NGS result, as previously reported[5]. Then, further immunohistological staining of CD68, CD8 and CD4 were used to detect macrophage and T cell distribution in the tumor, and immunohistological staining of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) was used to detect the expression of PD-L1 in the tumor cell. Immunohistological staining showed that there was high expression of CD8, low expression of CD4 and little expression of CD68 in the tumor, and up to 90% of tumor cells expressed PD-L1 (Figure 5).
Figure 4
Positron emission tomography-computed tomography. A-C: Multiple metastases had nearly disappeared.
Figure 5
Immunohistological staining. A-D: There was high expression of CD8, low expression of CD4 and little expression of CD68 in the tumor. Up to 90% of tumor cells expressed programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1).
Positron emission tomography-computed tomography. A-C: Multiple metastases had nearly disappeared.Immunohistological staining. A-D: There was high expression of CD8, low expression of CD4 and little expression of CD68 in the tumor. Up to 90% of tumor cells expressed programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1).
DISCUSSION
Anti-PD-1 treatment, as a new immunotherapy, has the advantages of few side effects, limited pain and long-lasting effects[6]. Therefore, an increasing number of researchers have attempted to use anti-PD-1 to treat multiple types of tumors[7,8]. For the first time in this case, pembrolizumab was used to treat UESL, and the result was encouraging. Pembrolizumab may be a new method to treat UESL.In our case, radiofrequency ablation was applied to control the lesion near the hepatic hilum. Although ablation does not provide a cure, it may assist pem-brolizumab in destroying tumor cells. Local ablation can destroy tumor cells, and then tumor antigens are released into the microenvironment and blood. Recent research has revealed that immunotherapy combined with local treatment can prolong the survival time of liver cancer[9]. Other research has revealed that local treatment, such as radiotherapy, can release antigenic peptides from tumors, cause the activation and migration of dendritic cells and enhance antigen presentation by dendritic cells leading to enhanced antitumor T-cell recognition and activity[10].We were curious why the patient had a good response to pembrolizumab and wanted to determine how other appropriate candidates for anti-PD-1 treatment could be identified. In our case, biopsy and peripheral blood were used to perform NGS. However, the gene mutations found in this patient were not associated with a favorable response to pembrolizumab. High TMB and microsatellite instability in tumors are associated with a favorable response to pembrolizumab, and the Food and Drug Administration has authorized pembrolizumab to be used to treat multiple types of tumors with high TMB and microsatellite instability[11]. However, in this case, NGS showed that the tumor had low TMB and microsatellite stability, which was contradictory to other responsive tumors[5]. Therefore, low TMB and microsatellite stability were not contraindications for anti-PD-1 treatment.Then, immunohistological staining showed that up to 90% of the tumor cells expressed PD-L1. This may be the reason why the patient had a favorable response to pembrolizumab. Many researchers have found that PD-L1 is expressed in many types of tumors, and high-level expression of PD-L1 is always associated with poor tumor prognosis[12]. In some types of tumors, such as lung cancer, high-level expression of PD-L1 is associated with a good response to anti-PD-1 treatment[13]. However, in other types of tumors, the expression of PD-L1 is not associated with responses to anti-PD-1 treatment[14]. Defining the high-level expression of PD-L1 is also controversial[15]. Moreover, the location of PD-L1 expression also needs further research[16]. Therefore, PD-L1 expression, as a biomarker for predicting the effect of PD-1 antibodies, also needs further research.In our opinion, TMB, microsatellite instability and PD-L1 expression can be combined to predict the effect of PD-1 antibodies. When every one of these biomarkers is detected in a tumorpatient, the patient may be a proper candidate for PD-1 antibodies. However, anti-PD-1, as a new treatment for tumors, needs further research to identify the indications and proper biomarkers.
CONCLUSION
We reported a case of recurrent UESL in an adult patient treated with pembrolizumab, and UESL had a nearly complete response to pembrolizumab. Immunohistological staining of PD-L1 was highlighted and corresponded to the effect of pembrolizumab. Therefore, PD-L1 expression may be combined with TMB and microsatellite instability to predict the effect of PD-1 antibody treatment.
Authors: Elizabeth R Plimack; Joaquim Bellmunt; Shilpa Gupta; Raanan Berger; Laura Q M Chow; Jonathan Juco; Jared Lunceford; Sanatan Saraf; Rodolfo F Perini; Peter H O'Donnell Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Austin G Duffy; Susanna V Ulahannan; Oxana Makorova-Rusher; Osama Rahma; Heiner Wedemeyer; Drew Pratt; Jeremy L Davis; Marybeth S Hughes; Theo Heller; Mei ElGindi; Ashish Uppala; Firouzeh Korangy; David E Kleiner; William D Figg; David Venzon; Seth M Steinberg; Aradhana M Venkatesan; Venkatesh Krishnasamy; Nadine Abi-Jaoudeh; Elliot Levy; Brad J Wood; Tim F Greten Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2016-11-02 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Janis M Taube; Alison Klein; Julie R Brahmer; Haiying Xu; Xiaoyu Pan; Jung H Kim; Lieping Chen; Drew M Pardoll; Suzanne L Topalian; Robert A Anders Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-04-08 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Suzanne L Topalian; F Stephen Hodi; Julie R Brahmer; Scott N Gettinger; David C Smith; David F McDermott; John D Powderly; Richard D Carvajal; Jeffrey A Sosman; Michael B Atkins; Philip D Leming; David R Spigel; Scott J Antonia; Leora Horn; Charles G Drake; Drew M Pardoll; Lieping Chen; William H Sharfman; Robert A Anders; Janis M Taube; Tracee L McMiller; Haiying Xu; Alan J Korman; Maria Jure-Kunkel; Shruti Agrawal; Daniel McDonald; Georgia D Kollia; Ashok Gupta; Jon M Wigginton; Mario Sznol Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-06-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Leora Horn; David R Spigel; Everett E Vokes; Esther Holgado; Neal Ready; Martin Steins; Elena Poddubskaya; Hossein Borghaei; Enriqueta Felip; Luis Paz-Ares; Adam Pluzanski; Karen L Reckamp; Marco A Burgio; Martin Kohlhäeufl; David Waterhouse; Fabrice Barlesi; Scott Antonia; Oscar Arrieta; Jérôme Fayette; Lucio Crinò; Naiyer Rizvi; Martin Reck; Matthew D Hellmann; William J Geese; Ang Li; Anne Blackwood-Chirchir; Diane Healey; Julie Brahmer; Wilfried E E Eberhardt Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-10-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Janice M Mehnert; Andrea Varga; Marcia S Brose; Rahul R Aggarwal; Chia-Chi Lin; Amy Prawira; Filippo de Braud; Kenji Tamura; Toshihiko Doi; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Jill Gilbert; Sanatan Saraf; Pradeep Thanigaimani; Jonathan D Cheng; Bhumsuk Keam Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2019-03-04 Impact factor: 4.430