Literature DB >> 21244592

The evolution of unconditional strategies via the 'multiplier effect'.

John M McNamara1, Sasha R X Dall.   

Abstract

Ostensibly, it makes sense in a changeable world to condition behaviour and development on information when it is available. Nevertheless, unconditional behavioural and life history strategies are widespread. Here, we show how intergenerational effects can limit the evolutionary value of responding to reliable environmental cues, and thus favour the evolutionary persistence of otherwise paradoxical unconditional strategies. While cue-ignoring genotypes do poorly in the wrong environments, in the right environment they will leave many copies of themselves, which will themselves leave many copies, and so on, leading genotypes to accumulate in habitats in which they do well. We call this 'The Multiplier Effect'. We explore the consequences of the multiplier effect by focussing on the ecologically important phenomenon of natal philopatry. We model the environment as a large number of temporally varying breeding sites connected by natal dispersal between sites. Our aim is to identify which aspects of an environment promote the multiplier effect. We show, if sites remain connected through some background level of 'accidental' dispersal, unconditional natal philopatry can evolve even when there is density dependence (with its accompanying kin competition effects), and cues that are only mildly erroneous. Thus, the multiplier effect may underpin the evolution and maintenance of unconditional strategies such as natal philopatry in many biological systems.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21244592     DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01576.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  9 in total

1.  Evolution in changing environments: modifiers of mutation, recombination, and migration.

Authors:  Oana Carja; Uri Liberman; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Demography can favour female-advantageous alleles.

Authors:  Anna M F Harts; Lisa E Schwanz; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  An empiricist's guide to theoretical predictions on the evolution of dispersal.

Authors:  Anne Duputié; François Massol
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Personality-matching habitat choice, rather than behavioural plasticity, is a likely driver of a phenotype-environment covariance.

Authors:  Benedikt Holtmann; Eduardo S A Santos; Carlos E Lara; Shinichi Nakagawa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Evolution of epigenetic transmission when selection acts on fecundity versus viability.

Authors:  Bram Kuijper; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 6.671

6.  When to rely on maternal effects and when on phenotypic plasticity?

Authors:  Bram Kuijper; Rebecca B Hoyle
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Sporadic nesting reveals long distance colonisation in the philopatric loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta).

Authors:  Carlos Carreras; Marta Pascual; Jesús Tomás; Adolfo Marco; Sandra Hochscheid; Juan José Castillo; Patricia Gozalbes; Mariluz Parga; Susanna Piovano; Luis Cardona
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Win-stay/lose-switch, prospecting-based settlement strategy may not be adaptive under rapid environmental change.

Authors:  Janusz Kloskowski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Phenotypic and environmental correlates of natal dispersal in a long-lived territorial vulture.

Authors:  David Serrano; Ainara Cortés-Avizanda; Iñigo Zuberogoitia; Guillermo Blanco; José Ramón Benítez; Cecile Ponchon; Juan Manuel Grande; Olga Ceballos; Jon Morant; Eneko Arrondo; Jabi Zabala; Eugenio Montelío; Enrique Ávila; José L González; Bernardo Arroyo; Óscar Frías; Erick Kobierzycki; Rafael Arenas; José Luis Tella; José Antonio Donázar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.