Literature DB >> 33866472

Tumor-Nipple Distance of ≥ 1 cm Predicts Negative Nipple Pathology After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Tracy-Ann Moo1, Carolina Rossi Saccarelli2,3, Elizabeth J Sutton2, Varadan Sevilimedu4, Kate R Pawloski5, Timothy M D'Alfonso6, Mary C Hughes2, Jill S Gluskin2, Almir Bitencourt2, Elizabeth A Morris2, Audree Tadros5, Monica Morrow5, Mary L Gemignani5, Virgilio Sacchini5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer has become more widely used, so has nipple-sparing mastectomy. A common criterion for eligibility is a 1 cm tumor-to-nipple distance (TND), but its suitability after NAC is unclear. In this study, we examined factors predictive of negative nipple pathologic status (NS-) in women undergoing total mastectomy after NAC.
METHODS: Women with invasive breast cancer treated with NAC and total mastectomy from August 2014 to April 2018 at our institution were retrospectively identified. Following review of pre- and post-NAC magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and mammograms, the association of clinicopathologic and imaging variables with NS- was examined and the accuracy of 1 cm TND on imaging for predicting NS- was determined.
RESULTS: Among 175 women undergoing 179 mastectomies, 74% of tumors were cT1-T2 and 67% were cN+ on pre-NAC staging; 10% (18/179) had invasive or in situ carcinoma in the nipple on final pathology. On multivariable analysis, after adjusting for age, grade, and tumor stage, three factors, namely number of positive nodes, pre-NAC nipple-areolar complex retraction, and decreasing TND, were significant predictors of nipple involvement (p < 0.05). The likelihood of NS- was higher with increasing TND on pre- and post-NAC imaging (p < 0.05). TND ≥ 1 cm predicted NS- in 97% and 95% of breasts on pre- and post-NAC imaging, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing TND was associated with a higher likelihood of NS-. A TND ≥ 1 cm on pre- or post-NAC imaging is highly predictive of NS- and could be used to determine eligibility for nipple-sparing mastectomy after NAC.
© 2021. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33866472      PMCID: PMC9401087          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09902-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   4.339


  21 in total

1.  Clinical and radiological predictors of nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Marta D'Alonzo; Laura Martincich; Nicoletta Biglia; Alberto Pisacane; Furio Maggiorotto; Giovanni De Rosa; Filippo Montemurro; Franziska Kubatzki; Piero Sismondi; Riccardo Ponzone
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  MRI diagnostic features for predicting nipple-areolar-complex involvement in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jieun Koh; Ah Young Park; Kyung Hee Ko; Hae Kyoung Jung
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Applicability of the nipple-areola complex-sparing mastectomy: a prediction model using mammography to estimate risk of nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Amy K Schecter; M Brandon Freeman; Dilip Giri; Edmond Sabo; Jeffrey Weinzweig
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  Outcomes of > 1300 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomies with Immediate Reconstruction: The Impact of Expanding Indications on Complications.

Authors:  Whitney A Young; Amy C Degnim; Tanya L Hoskin; James W Jakub; Minh-Doan Nguyen; Nho V Tran; Christin A Harless; Oscar J Manrique; Judy C Boughey; Tina J Hieken
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis.

Authors:  Patricia Cortazar; Lijun Zhang; Michael Untch; Keyur Mehta; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark; Hervé Bonnefoi; David Cameron; Luca Gianni; Pinuccia Valagussa; Sandra M Swain; Tatiana Prowell; Sibylle Loibl; D Lawrence Wickerham; Jan Bogaerts; Jose Baselga; Charles Perou; Gideon Blumenthal; Jens Blohmer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Jonas Bergh; Vladimir Semiglazov; Robert Justice; Holger Eidtmann; Soonmyung Paik; Martine Piccart; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Peter A Fasching; Leen Slaets; Shenghui Tang; Bernd Gerber; Charles E Geyer; Richard Pazdur; Nina Ditsch; Priya Rastogi; Wolfgang Eiermann; Gunter von Minckwitz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Feasibility of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients with Tumor-Nipple Distance Less Than 2.0 cm.

Authors:  Jai Min Ryu; Seok Jin Nam; Seok Won Kim; Se Kyung Lee; Soo Youn Bae; Ha Woo Yi; Sungmin Park; Hyun-June Paik; Jeong Eon Lee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not a contraindication for nipple sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Stefano Santoro; Andrea Loreti; Francesco Cavaliere; Leopoldo Costarelli; Massimo La Pinta; Elena Manna; Maria Mauri; Paola Scavina; Elena Santini; Ugo De Paula; Vito Toto; Lucio Fortunato
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.380

8.  Oncological Outcomes of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Single-Center Experience of 1989 Patients.

Authors:  Viviana Galimberti; Consuelo Morigi; Vincenzo Bagnardi; Giovanni Corso; Elisa Vicini; Sabrina Kahler Ribeiro Fontana; Paola Naninato; Silvia Ratini; Francesca Magnoni; Antonio Toesca; Andriana Kouloura; Mario Rietjens; Francesca De Lorenzi; Andrea Vingiani; Paolo Veronesi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Occult nipple involvement in breast cancer: clinicopathologic findings in 316 consecutive mastectomy specimens.

Authors:  Elena F Brachtel; Jennifer E Rusby; James S Michaelson; L Leon Chen; Alona Muzikansky; Barbara L Smith; Frederick C Koerner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Oncologic Outcomes of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Tumor-Nipple Distance Less than 2.0 cm.

Authors:  Emad Alsharif; Jai Min Ryu; Hee Jun Choi; Seok Jin Nam; Seok Won Kim; Jonghan Yu; Byung Joo Chae; Se Kyung Lee; Jeong Eon Lee
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 3.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.