Literature DB >> 30225833

Oncological Outcomes of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Single-Center Experience of 1989 Patients.

Viviana Galimberti1, Consuelo Morigi2, Vincenzo Bagnardi3, Giovanni Corso2, Elisa Vicini2, Sabrina Kahler Ribeiro Fontana2,4, Paola Naninato2, Silvia Ratini2, Francesca Magnoni2, Antonio Toesca2, Andriana Kouloura2, Mario Rietjens5, Francesca De Lorenzi5, Andrea Vingiani6, Paolo Veronesi2,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is increasingly used in women with breast cancer who are not eligible for conservative surgery, but extensive outcome data are lacking and indications have not been established.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the oncological outcomes of NSM in a large series of patients with invasive or in situ breast cancer treated at a single center.
METHODS: We analyzed 1989 consecutive women who had an NSM in 2003-2011, for invasive (1711 patients) or in situ cancer (278 patients) at the European Institute of Oncology, Italy, and followed-up to December 2016. Endpoints were local recurrences, recurrences in the nipple-areola complex (NAC), NAC necrosis, and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 94 months (interquartile range 70-117), 91/1711 (5.3%) patients with invasive cancer had local recurrence (4.8% invasive disease, 0.5% in situ disease), and 11/278 (4.0%) patients with in situ disease had local recurrence (1.8% invasive disease, 2.2% in situ disease). Thirty-six (1.8%) patients had NAC recurrence, 9 with in situ disease (4 invasive and 5 in situ recurrences), and 27 with invasive disease (18 invasive and 9 in situ recurrences). NAC loss for necrosis occurred in 66 (3.3%) patients. There were 131 (6.6%) deaths, 109 (5.5%) as a result of breast cancer. OS at 5 years was 96.1% in women with invasive cancer and 99.2% in women with in situ disease.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings in this large series, with a median follow-up of nearly 8 years, indicate that NSM is oncologically safe for selected patients. The rate of NAC loss was acceptably low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30225833     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6759-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  9 in total

Review 1.  Radiotherapy after skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction in intermediate-risk breast cancer : Indication and technical considerations.

Authors:  Thomas Hehr; René Baumann; Wilfried Budach; Marciana-Nona Duma; Jürgen Dunst; Petra Feyer; Rainer Fietkau; Wulf Haase; Wolfgang Harms; David Krug; Marc D Piroth; Felix Sedlmayer; Rainer Souchon; Frederick Wenz; Rolf Sauer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Microwave Ablation Versus Nipple Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer ≤5 cm: A Pilot Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jie Yu; Zhi-Yu Han; Ting Li; Wen-Zhe Feng; Xiao-Ling Yu; Yan-Chun Luo; Han Wu; Jian Jiang; Jian-Dong Wang; Ping Liang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 3.  Clinical outcomes of patients after nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction based on the expander/implant technique.

Authors:  Uhi Toh; Miki Takenaka; Nobutaka Iwakuma; Yoshito Akagi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Tumor-Nipple Distance of ≥ 1 cm Predicts Negative Nipple Pathology After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Tracy-Ann Moo; Carolina Rossi Saccarelli; Elizabeth J Sutton; Varadan Sevilimedu; Kate R Pawloski; Timothy M D'Alfonso; Mary C Hughes; Jill S Gluskin; Almir Bitencourt; Elizabeth A Morris; Audree Tadros; Monica Morrow; Mary L Gemignani; Virgilio Sacchini
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 4.339

Review 5.  Hereditary Gastric and Breast Cancer Syndromes Related to CDH1 Germline Mutation: A Multidisciplinary Clinical Review.

Authors:  Giovanni Corso; Giacomo Montagna; Joana Figueiredo; Carlo La Vecchia; Uberto Fumagalli Romario; Maria Sofia Fernandes; Susana Seixas; Franco Roviello; Cristina Trovato; Elena Guerini-Rocco; Nicola Fusco; Gabriella Pravettoni; Serena Petrocchi; Anna Rotili; Giulia Massari; Francesca Magnoni; Francesca De Lorenzi; Manuela Bottoni; Viviana Galimberti; João Miguel Sanches; Mariarosaria Calvello; Raquel Seruca; Bernardo Bonanni
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Post-Operative Complications and Nipple Necrosis Rates Between Conventional and Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

Authors:  Jeea Lee; Hyung Seok Park; Haemin Lee; Dong Won Lee; Seung Yong Song; Dae Hyun Lew; Jee Ye Kim; Seho Park; Seung Il Kim
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Prospective pilot study protocol evaluating the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (RNSM).

Authors:  Ko Un Park; Sandy Lee; Angela Sarna; Matthew Chetta; Steven Schulz; Doreen Agnese; Valerie Grignol; William Carson; Roman J Skoracki
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Satisfaction with Long-Term Aesthetic and 10 Years Oncologic Outcome following Risk-Reducing Mastectomy and Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with or without Nipple Preservation.

Authors:  Rachel Louise O'Connell; Marios Konstantinos Tasoulis; Evguenia Hristova; Victoria Teoh; Ana Agusti; Ann Ward; Catherine Montgomery; Kabir Mohammed; Janet Self; Jennifer Elizabeth Rusby; Gerald Gui
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-24       Impact factor: 6.575

9.  The Role of Sharp Dissection in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Safe Procedure with No Necrosis of the Nipple-Areolar Complex.

Authors:  Ci-Qiu Yang; Fei Ji; Hong-Fei Gao; Liu-Lu Zhang; Mei Yang; Teng Zhu; Min-Yi Chen; Jie-Qing Li; Kun Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.989

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.