Marissa F White1, Sean Tanabe2, Cameron Casey1, Maggie Parker1, Amber Bo1, David Kunkel1, Veena Nair3, Robert A Pearce1, Richard Lennertz1, Vivek Prabhakaran3, Heidi Lindroth4, Robert D Sanders5. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. 2. Center for Consciousness Science, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. 4. Division of Nursing Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; School of Medicine, Center for Health Innovation and Implementation Science, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 5. University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Department of Anaesthetics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Institute of Academic Surgery, Camperdown, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: robert.sanders@sydney.edu.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is unclear how preoperative neurodegeneration and postoperative changes in EEG delta power relate to postoperative delirium severity. We sought to understand the relative relationships between neurodegeneration and delta power as predictors of delirium severity. METHODS: We undertook a prospective cohort study of high-risk surgical patients (>65 yr old) to identify predictors of peak delirium severity (Delirium Rating Scale-98) with twice-daily delirium assessments (NCT03124303). Participants (n=86) underwent preoperative MRI; 54 had both an MRI and a postoperative EEG. Cortical thickness was calculated from the MRI and delta power from the EEG. RESULTS: In a linear regression model, the interaction between delirium status and preoperative mean cortical thickness (suggesting neurodegeneration) across the entire cortex was a significant predictor of delirium severity (P<0.001) when adjusting for age, sex, and performance on preoperative Trail Making Test B. Next, we included postoperative delta power and repeated the analysis (n=54). Again, the interaction between mean cortical thickness and delirium was associated with delirium severity (P=0.028), as was postoperative delta power (P<0.001). When analysed across the Desikan-Killiany-Tourville atlas, thickness in multiple individual cortical regions was also associated with delirium severity. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative cortical thickness and postoperative EEG delta power are both associated with postoperative delirium severity. These findings might reflect different underlying processes or mechanisms. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03124303.
BACKGROUND: It is unclear how preoperative neurodegeneration and postoperative changes in EEG delta power relate to postoperative delirium severity. We sought to understand the relative relationships between neurodegeneration and delta power as predictors of delirium severity. METHODS: We undertook a prospective cohort study of high-risk surgical patients (>65 yr old) to identify predictors of peak delirium severity (Delirium Rating Scale-98) with twice-daily delirium assessments (NCT03124303). Participants (n=86) underwent preoperative MRI; 54 had both an MRI and a postoperative EEG. Cortical thickness was calculated from the MRI and delta power from the EEG. RESULTS: In a linear regression model, the interaction between delirium status and preoperative mean cortical thickness (suggesting neurodegeneration) across the entire cortex was a significant predictor of delirium severity (P<0.001) when adjusting for age, sex, and performance on preoperative Trail Making Test B. Next, we included postoperative delta power and repeated the analysis (n=54). Again, the interaction between mean cortical thickness and delirium was associated with delirium severity (P=0.028), as was postoperative delta power (P<0.001). When analysed across the Desikan-Killiany-Tourville atlas, thickness in multiple individual cortical regions was also associated with delirium severity. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative cortical thickness and postoperative EEG delta power are both associated with postoperative delirium severity. These findings might reflect different underlying processes or mechanisms. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03124303.
Authors: Michele Cavallari; Weiying Dai; Charles R G Guttmann; Dominik S Meier; Long H Ngo; Tammy T Hshieh; Amy E Callahan; Tamara G Fong; Eva Schmitt; Bradford C Dickerson; Daniel Z Press; Edward R Marcantonio; Richard N Jones; Sharon K Inouye; David C Alsop Journal: Brain Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Edwin van Dellen; Arendina W van der Kooi; Tianne Numan; Huiberdina L Koek; Francina A M Klijn; Marc P Buijsrogge; Cornelis J Stam; Arjen J C Slooter Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: E W Ely; S K Inouye; G R Bernard; S Gordon; J Francis; L May; B Truman; T Speroff; S Gautam; R Margolin; R P Hart; R Dittus Journal: JAMA Date: 2001-12-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Edward R Marcantonio; Long H Ngo; Margaret O'Connor; Richard N Jones; Paul K Crane; Eran D Metzger; Sharon K Inouye Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-10-21 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Joost Witlox; Lisa S M Eurelings; Jos F M de Jonghe; Kees J Kalisvaart; Piet Eikelenboom; Willem A van Gool Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-07-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Clifford R Jack; David A Bennett; Kaj Blennow; Maria C Carrillo; Billy Dunn; Samantha Budd Haeberlein; David M Holtzman; William Jagust; Frank Jessen; Jason Karlawish; Enchi Liu; Jose Luis Molinuevo; Thomas Montine; Creighton Phelps; Katherine P Rankin; Christopher C Rowe; Philip Scheltens; Eric Siemers; Heather M Snyder; Reisa Sperling Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: David Kunkel; Margaret Parker; Cameron Casey; Bryan Krause; Robert A Pearce; Richard Lennertz; Robert D Sanders Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2021-09-29 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Sean Tanabe; Maggie Parker; Richard Lennertz; Robert A Pearce; Matthew I Banks; Robert D Sanders Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 6.591