BACKGROUND: Delirium is common, leads to other adverse outcomes, and is costly. However, it often remains unrecognized in most clinical settings. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) is the most widely used diagnostic algorithm, and operationalizing its features would be a substantial advance for clinical care. OBJECTIVE: To derive the 3D-CAM, a new 3-minute diagnostic assessment for CAM-defined delirium, and validate it against a clinical reference standard. DESIGN: Derivation and validation study. SETTING: 4 general medicine units in an academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: 201 inpatients aged 75 years or older. MEASUREMENTS: 20 items that best operationalized the 4 CAM diagnostic features were identified to create the 3D-CAM. For prospective validation, 3D-CAM assessments were administered by trained research assistants. Clinicians independently did an extensive assessment, including patient and family interviews and medical record reviews. These data were considered by an expert panel to determine the presence or absence of delirium and dementia (reference standard). The 3D-CAM delirium diagnosis was compared with the reference standard in all patients and subgroups with and without dementia. RESULTS: The 201 participants in the prospective validation study had a mean age of 84 years, and 28% had dementia. The expert panel identified 21% with delirium, 88% of whom had hypoactive or normal psychomotor features. Median administration time for the 3D-CAM was 3 minutes (interquartile range, 2 to 5 minutes), sensitivity was 95% (95% CI, 84% to 99%), and specificity was 94% (CI, 90% to 97%). The 3D-CAM did well in patients with dementia (sensitivity, 96% [CI, 82% to 100%]; specificity, 86% [CI, 67% to 96%]) and without dementia (sensitivity, 93% [CI, 66% to 100%]; specificity, 96% [CI, 91% to 99%]). LIMITATION: Limited to single-center, cross-sectional, and medical patients only. CONCLUSION: The 3D-CAM operationalizes the CAM algorithm using a 3-minute structured assessment with high sensitivity and specificity relative to a reference standard and could be an important tool for improving recognition of delirium. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute on Aging.
BACKGROUND:Delirium is common, leads to other adverse outcomes, and is costly. However, it often remains unrecognized in most clinical settings. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) is the most widely used diagnostic algorithm, and operationalizing its features would be a substantial advance for clinical care. OBJECTIVE: To derive the 3D-CAM, a new 3-minute diagnostic assessment for CAM-defined delirium, and validate it against a clinical reference standard. DESIGN: Derivation and validation study. SETTING: 4 general medicine units in an academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: 201 inpatients aged 75 years or older. MEASUREMENTS: 20 items that best operationalized the 4 CAM diagnostic features were identified to create the 3D-CAM. For prospective validation, 3D-CAM assessments were administered by trained research assistants. Clinicians independently did an extensive assessment, including patient and family interviews and medical record reviews. These data were considered by an expert panel to determine the presence or absence of delirium and dementia (reference standard). The 3D-CAM delirium diagnosis was compared with the reference standard in all patients and subgroups with and without dementia. RESULTS: The 201 participants in the prospective validation study had a mean age of 84 years, and 28% had dementia. The expert panel identified 21% with delirium, 88% of whom had hypoactive or normal psychomotor features. Median administration time for the 3D-CAM was 3 minutes (interquartile range, 2 to 5 minutes), sensitivity was 95% (95% CI, 84% to 99%), and specificity was 94% (CI, 90% to 97%). The 3D-CAM did well in patients with dementia (sensitivity, 96% [CI, 82% to 100%]; specificity, 86% [CI, 67% to 96%]) and without dementia (sensitivity, 93% [CI, 66% to 100%]; specificity, 96% [CI, 91% to 99%]). LIMITATION: Limited to single-center, cross-sectional, and medical patients only. CONCLUSION: The 3D-CAM operationalizes the CAM algorithm using a 3-minute structured assessment with high sensitivity and specificity relative to a reference standard and could be an important tool for improving recognition of delirium. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute on Aging.
Authors: Koen Milisen; Marquis D Foreman; Bert Wouters; Ronny Driesen; Jan Godderis; Ivo L Abraham; Paul L O Broos Journal: J Gerontol Nurs Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 1.254
Authors: J E Galvin; C M Roe; K K Powlishta; M A Coats; S J Muich; E Grant; J P Miller; M Storandt; J C Morris Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-08-23 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Jin H Han; Amanda Wilson; Amy J Graves; Ayumi Shintani; John F Schnelle; Robert S Dittus; James S Powers; John Vernon; Alan B Storrow; E Wesley Ely Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: E W Ely; S K Inouye; G R Bernard; S Gordon; J Francis; L May; B Truman; T Speroff; S Gautam; R Margolin; R P Hart; R Dittus Journal: JAMA Date: 2001-12-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Edward R Marcantonio; Richard N Jones; Sharon K Inouye; Cyrus M Kosar; Douglas Tommet; Eva M Schmitt; Margaret R Puelle; Jane S Saczynski Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-04-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Alycia A Bristol; Kimberly A Convery; Victor Sotelo; Catherine E Schneider; Shih-Yin Lin; Jason Fletcher; Randall Rupper; James E Galvin; Abraham A Brody Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-04-19 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: P K Strutz; V Kronzer; W Tzeng; B Arrington; S L McKinnon; A Ben Abdallah; S Haroutounian; M S Avidan Journal: Anaesthesia Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 6.955
Authors: Claire M Motyl; Long Ngo; Wenxiao Zhou; Yoojin Jung; Douglas Leslie; Marie Boltz; Erica Husser; Sharon K Inouye; Donna Fick; Edward R Marcantonio Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jin H Han; Nathan E Brummel; Rameela Chandrasekhar; Jo Ellen Wilson; Xulei Liu; Eduard E Vasilevskis; Timothy D Girard; Maria E Carlo; Robert S Dittus; John F Schnelle; E Wesley Ely Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 4.105