| Literature DB >> 33864418 |
Emma J Bouman1, Mark M Smits1, Erik J van Bommel1, Marcel H A Muskiet1, Anne C Hesp1, Erik H Serné1, Jaap A Joles2, Daniël H van Raalte1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Diabetic kidney disease is a microvascular complication of diabetes. Here, we assessed the association between skin microvascular function and renal hemodynamic function in a cohort of well-phenotyped adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D).Entities:
Keywords: capillary recruitment; diabetic kidney disease; measured GFR; microvascular dysfunction; renal hemodynamics; type 2 diabetes
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33864418 PMCID: PMC8459253 DOI: 10.1111/micc.12700
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microcirculation ISSN: 1073-9688 Impact factor: 2.628
Baseline characteristics of the included 81 adults with type 2 diabetes
| Male sex, | 63 (77.8) |
| Age, years | 62.1 ± 7.6 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 31.7 ± 4.1 |
| Current smoker, | 16 (19.8) |
| Diabetes duration, years | 7.8 ± 5.2 |
| HbA1c, % | 7.3 ± 0.7 |
| HbA1c, mmol/mol | 56.2 ± 7.2 |
| Fasting plasma glucose, mmol/L | 8 (7.25–9) |
| Urine albumin/creatinine (mg/mmol) | 0.93 (0.45–2.82) |
| Systemic hemodynamic parameters | |
| Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg | 135.9 ± 14.4 |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg | 78.1 ± 7.4 |
| Mean arterial pressure, mm Hg | 98.5 ± 9.2 |
| Heart rate, bpm | 65.6 ± 8.6 |
| Medication | |
| Metformin use, | 78 (96.3) |
| Antihypertensives, | 52 (64.2) |
| RAAS inhibitor use, | 49 (60.5) |
| Microvascular measurements | |
| Baseline capillary density, n/mm2 | 44.7 ± 10.0 |
| Peak capillary density, n/mm2 | 57.0 ± 11.3 |
| Renal hemodynamics | |
| GFR, ml/min | 108.2 ± 19.5 |
| ERPF, ml/min | 571 ± 127 |
| ERBF, ml/min | 985 ± 234 |
| ERVR, mm Hg/L/min | 0.109 ± 0.028 |
| FF, % | 19 ± 2.2 |
Data are shown as percentage (%), mean±SD, or median (interquartile range).
Abbreviations: ERBF, effective renal blood flow; ERPF, effective renal plasma flow; ERVR, effective renal vascular resistance; FF, filtration fraction; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; RAAS, renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system.
Associations between selected baseline characteristics and baseline and peak capillary density
| Variables | Baseline capillary density | Peak capillary density | GFR | ERBF | ERVR | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.018 | 0.036 |
|
|
| 0.202 |
| Sex | −0.043 | −0.057 |
|
| 0.208 | −0.023 |
| Diabetes duration | 0.026 | 0.023 | −0.027 | −0.163 | 0.142 |
|
| Mean arterial pressure | 0.072 | 0.011 | −0.043 | −0.046 |
| 0.028 |
| Body mass index |
| −0.209 |
|
|
| −0.187 |
| Body surface area | −0.051 | −0.047 |
|
|
| −0.105 |
| HbA1c | 0.146 | 0.138 | 0.095 | 0.134 | −0.079 | −0.122 |
| Fasting plasma glucose | 0.043 | 0.013 |
|
| −0.149 | −0.135 |
| Urine ACR | −0.194 | −0.089 | 0.183 | 0.043 | −0.032 | 0.056 |
| Use of RAAS inhibitors | −0.169 | −0.135 | 0.076 | 0.048 | −0.146 | −0.057 |
Data show Spearman correlation coefficient r; the p‐value is indicated with an asterisk (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01) when statistically significant. The non‐parametric Spearman was chosen because of the non‐Gaussian distribution of the capillary measurements, GFR, age, T2DM duration, and urine ACR, and the dichotomous variable ‘sex’.
Abbreviations: ACR, albumin/creatinine ratio; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; RAAS, Renin‐Angiotensin‐Aldosterone System.
Multivariate associations between GFR, ERBF, ERVR, and FF and baseline and peak capillary density and hyperemia (peak capillary density corrected for baseline capillary density)
| Baseline capillary density | GFR (ml/min) | ERBF (ml/min) | ERVR (mm Hg/L/min) | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Model 1: Baseline capillary density | 0.133 [ | 0.138 [ | −0.099 [ | 0.022 [ |
|
Model 2: Model 1 + BMI, sex, age, diabetes duration, glucose | 0.155 [ |
| −0.139 [ | 0.003 [ |
|
| ||||
|
Model 3: Peak capillary density | 0.183 [ | 0.146 [ | −0.131 [ | 0.091 [ |
|
Model 4: Model 3 + BMI, sex, age, diabetes duration, glucose | 0.047 [ | |||
|
| ||||
|
Model 5: Peak corrected for baseline capillary density | 0.401 [ | 0.107 [ | −0.192 [ | 0.313 [ |
|
Model 6: Model 5 + BMI, sex, age, diabetes duration, glucose | 0.239 [ | 0.195 [ |
The independent variables were GFR (ml/min), ERBF (ml/min), ERVR (mm Hg/L/min) and FF. Data shown are standardized coefficients (β) and [p‐value].
Statistically significant associations are in bold and italic.