Literature DB >> 17400862

Risks, values, and decision making surrounding pregnancy.

Anne Drapkin Lyerly1, Lisa M Mitchell, Elizabeth M Armstrong, Lisa H Harris, Rebecca Kukla, Miriam Kuppermann, Margaret Olivia Little.   

Abstract

Assessing, communicating, and managing risk are among the most challenging tasks in the practice of medicine and are particularly difficult in the context of pregnancy. We analyze common scenarios in medical decision making around pregnancy, from reproductive health policy and clinical care to research protections. We describe three tendencies in these scenarios: 1) to consider the probabilities of undesirable outcomes alone, in isolation from women's values and social contexts, as determinative of individual clinical decisions and health policy; 2) to regard any risk to the fetus, including incremental risks that would in other contexts be regarded as acceptable, as trumping considerations that may be substantially more important to the wellbeing of the pregnant woman; and 3) to focus on the risks associated with undertaking medical interventions during pregnancy to the exclusion of demonstrable risks to both woman and fetus of failing to intervene. These tendencies in the perception, communication, and management of risk can lead to care that is neither evidence-based nor patient-centered, often to the detriment of both women and infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17400862     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000258285.43499.4b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  34 in total

1.  Social Media, Power, and the Future of VBAC.

Authors:  Amy M Romano; Hilary Gerber; Desirre Andrews
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2010

2.  Interpreting evidence: why values can matter as much as science.

Authors:  Inmaculada de Melo-Martín; Kristen Intemann
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.416

3.  Moral implications of obstetric technologies for pregnancy and motherhood.

Authors:  Susanne Brauer
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2016-03

4.  The Development of a Conceptual Framework and Preliminary Item Bank for Childbirth-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Lisa M Korst; Moshe Fridman; Samia Saeb; Naomi Greene; Arlene Fink; Kimberly D Gregory
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Neonatal mortality risk for repeat cesarean compared to vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in the United States, 1998-2002 birth cohorts.

Authors:  Fay Menacker; Marian F MacDorman; Eugene Declercq
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2010-03

6.  The National Vaccine Advisory Committee: reducing patient and provider barriers to maternal immunizations: approved by the National Vaccine Advisory Committee on June 11, 2014.

Authors: 
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 7.  Finding autonomy in birth.

Authors:  Rebecca Kukla; Miriam Kuppermann; Margaret Little; Anne Drapkin Lyerly; Lisa M Mitchell; Elizabeth M Armstrong; Lisa Harris
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.898

8.  The second wave: Toward responsible inclusion of pregnant women in research.

Authors:  Anne Drapkin Lyerly; Margaret Olivia Little; Ruth Faden
Journal:  Int J Fem Approaches Bioeth       Date:  2008

9.  Risk and the pregnant body.

Authors:  Anne Drapkin Lyerly; Lisa M Mitchell; Elizabeth Mitchell Armstrong; Lisa H Harris; Rebecca Kukla; Miriam Kuppermann; Margaret Olivia Little
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.683

10.  GPs' decision-making when prescribing medicines for breastfeeding women: Content analysis of a survey.

Authors:  Hiranya S Jayawickrama; Lisa H Amir; Marie V Pirotta
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-03-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.