Literature DB >> 33857711

Investigating tradeoffs between supply, use and demand of ecosystem services and their effective drivers for sustainable environmental management.

Azam Khosravi Mashizi1, Mohsen Sharafatmandrad2.   

Abstract

Ecosystems have a huge impact on social systems through providing diverse services. Sustainable management of social and ecological systems requires the quantification of spatial relationships between the supply, demand, and use of these ecosystem services. The main purpose of this paper was to provide a framework addressing all the complicated relationships of ecosystem services between ecological and social systems. Sustainable management cannot be achieved without considering these complex relationships. To simplify these complexities, management priorities must be identified. In this study, spatial changes of supply, use, and demand of ecosystem services and their main drivers were investigated. A Public Participation Geographic Information System was used to map the supply, demand and use of 19 ecosystem services in semiarid landscapes of Iran. Multi Criteria Decision Making methods were also used to link ecosystem services to social well-being. The main drivers of tradeoffs between supply, use, and demand of ecosystem services were determined using General Linear Method. The results showed that there was a synergy between supply, demand and use of ecosystem services in highlands. The deficit zones of ecosystem services were concentrated in lowlands. Provisioning services were the most important services for social well-being. The framework presented in this paper revealed all the complex relationships that the environmental management is faced with in ecosystem and social systems. Simplifying integrated relationships in both ecosystems (supply) and social systems (demand and use) helps sustainable management of ecosystems under environmental and social changes.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Arid land; Rangeland; Social system; Vegetation; Well-being

Year:  2021        PMID: 33857711     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  3 in total

1.  Assessing Ecological Infrastructure Investments-A Case Study of Water Rights Trading in Lu'an City, Anhui Province, China.

Authors:  Qiuyan Wang; Qingjian Zhao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Demand for forest ecosystem services: a comparison study in selected areas in the Czech Republic and China.

Authors:  Miroslava Hochmalová; Ratna Chrismiari Purwestri; Jian Yongfeng; Vilém Jarský; Marcel Riedl; Dian Yuanyong; Miroslav Hájek
Journal:  Eur J For Res       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 3.140

3.  Spatiotemporal Differentiation and Balance Pattern of Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand in the Yangtze River Economic Belt.

Authors:  Chong Zhao; Pengnan Xiao; Peng Qian; Jie Xu; Lin Yang; Yixiao Wu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.614

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.