Literature DB >> 33856083

Impact of surgical margins on local control in patients undergoing single-modality transoral robotic surgery for HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Andrew J Holcomb1, Matthew Herberg2, Madeleine Strohl3, Edgar Ochoa3, Allen L Feng1, Nicholas B Abt1, Tara E Mokhtari1, Krish Suresh1, Christopher I McHugh1, Anuraag S Parikh1, Peter Sadow1, William Faquin1, Daniel Faden1, Daniel G Deschler1, Mark A Varvares1, Derrick T Lin1, Carole Fakhry2, William R Ryan3, Jeremy D Richmon1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of close surgical margins on oncologic outcomes in HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV + OPSCC) is unclear.
METHODS: Retrospective case series including patients undergoing single modality transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for HPV + OPSCC at three academic medical centers from 2010 to 2019. Outcomes were compared between patients with close surgical margins (<1 mm or requiring re-resection) and clear margins using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were included (median follow-up 21 months, range 6-121). Final margins were close in 22 (22.2%) patients, clear in 75 (75.8%), and positive in two (2.0%). Eight patients (8.1%) recurred, including two local recurrences (2.0%). Four patients died during the study period (4.0%). Local control (p = 0.470), disease-free survival (p = 0.513), and overall survival (p = 0.064) did not differ between patients with close and clear margins.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with close surgical margins after TORS for HPV + OPSCC without concurrent indications for adjuvant therapy may be considered for observation alone.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  human papillomavirus; oropharynx; squamous cell carcinoma; surgical margins; transoral robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33856083      PMCID: PMC9361190          DOI: 10.1002/hed.26708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.821


  44 in total

1.  Estimation of the width of free margin with a significant impact on local recurrence in surgical resection of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  S Yamada; H Kurita; T Shimane; T Kamata; S Uehara; H Tanaka; T Yamamoto
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 2.  A meta-analysis of margin size and local recurrence in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Caroline Rachael Anderson; Katherine Sisson; Marc Moncrieff
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 5.337

3.  Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) for Bilateral Eagle Syndrome.

Authors:  Filippo Montevecchi; Alberto Caranti; Giovanni Cammaroto; Giuseppe Meccariello; Claudio Vicini
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 1.538

4.  Functional outcomes, feasibility, and safety of resection of transoral robotic surgery: single-institution series of 35 consecutive cases of transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Balazs B Lörincz; Nikolaus Möckelmann; Chia-Jung Busch; Rainald Knecht
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.147

5.  Trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS) for the treatment of lingual tonsillitis. When conventional therapies fail.

Authors:  Filippo Montevecchi; Giovanni Cammaroto; Giuseppe Meccariello; Giovanni D'Agostino; Ying-Shuo Hsu; Bruno Galletti; Claudio Vicini
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.547

6.  Extracapsular extension is a poor predictor of disease recurrence in surgically treated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  James S Lewis; Danielle H Carpenter; Wade L Thorstad; Qin Zhang; Bruce H Haughey
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Relocating the site of frozen sections--is there room for improvement?

Authors:  C J Kerawala; T K Ong
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  Treatment of early-stage glottic cancer by transoral laser resection.

Authors:  Dana M Hartl; Erwan de Monès; Stéphane Hans; François Janot; Daniel Brasnu
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer: Risk factors for treatment failure in patients managed with primary transoral robotic surgery.

Authors:  John M Kaczmar; Kay See Tan; Daniel F Heitjan; Alexander Lin; Peter H Ahn; Jason G Newman; Christopher H Rassekh; Ara A Chalian; Bert W O'Malley; Roger B Cohen; Gregory S Weinstein
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 3.147

10.  Transoral robotic surgery: radical tonsillectomy.

Authors:  Gregory S Weinstein; Bert W O'Malley; Wendy Snyder; Eric Sherman; Harry Quon
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-12
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Robotic vs. transoral laser surgery of malignant oropharyngeal tumors-what is best for the patient? : A contemporary review.

Authors:  Thomas H Nagel; Brent A Chang; Michael L Hinni
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Practice patterns in transoral robotic surgery: results of an American head and neck society survey.

Authors:  Andrew J Holcomb; Rachael Kammer; Allison Holman; Tessa Goldsmith; Vasu Divi; Heather M Starmer; Joseph Zenga; Ryan Li; Urjeet A Patel; Jeremy D Richmon
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-08-07

Review 3.  Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tonsil versus Base of Tongue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nicolas S Poupore; Tiffany Chen; Shaun A Nguyen; Cherie-Ann O Nathan; Jason G Newman
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 6.575

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.