Literature DB >> 33855832

[Biomechanical study of polymethyl methacrylate bone cement and allogeneic bone for strengthening sheep vertebrae].

Zhikun Wang1, Xiansen Zhang1, Zaixue Li1, Qingyu Feng1, Jianting Chen2, Wenwei Xie1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and mechanical properties of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement and allogeneic bone mixture to strengthen sheep vertebrae with osteoporotic compression fracture.
METHODS: A total of 75 lumbar vertebrae (L 1-L 5) of adult goats was harvested to prepare the osteoporotic vertebral body model by decalcification. The volume of vertebral body and the weight and bone density before and after decalcification were measured. And the failure strength, failure displacement, and stiffness were tested by using a mechanical tester. Then the vertebral compression fracture models were prepared and divided into 3 groups ( n=25). The vertebral bodies were injected with allogeneic bone in group A, PMMA bone cement in group B, and mixture of allogeneic bone and PMMA bone cement in a ratio of 1∶1 in group C. After CT observation of the implant distribution in the vertebral body, the failure strength, failure displacement, and stiffness of the vertebral body were measured again.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in weight, bone density, and volume of vertebral bodies before decalcification between groups ( P>0.05). After decalcification, there was no significant difference in bone density, decreasing rate, and weight between groups ( P>0.05). There were significant differences in vertebral body weight and bone mineral density between pre- and post-decalcification in 3 groups ( P<0.05). CT showed that the implants in each group were evenly distributed in the vertebral body with no leakage. Before fracture, the differences in vertebral body failure strength, failure displacement, and stiffness between groups were not significant ( P>0.05). After augmentation, the failure displacement of group A was significantly greater than that of groups B and C, and the failure strength and stiffness were less than those of groups B and C, the failure displacement of group C was greater than that of group B, and the failure strength and stiffness were less than those of group B, the differences between groups were significant ( P<0.05). Except for the failure strength of group A ( P>0.05), the differences in the failure strength, failure displacement, and stiffness before fracture and after augmentation in the other groups were significant ( P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: The mixture of allogeneic bone and PMMA bone cement in a ratio of 1∶1 can improve the strength of the vertebral body of sheep osteoporotic compression fractures and restore the initial stiffness of the vertebral body. It has good mechanical properties and can be used as one of the filling materials in percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Vertebral compression fracture; allogeneic bone; biomechanics; osteoporosis; percutaneous vertebroplasty; polymethyl methacrylate bone cement; sheep

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33855832      PMCID: PMC8171622          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202011061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  26 in total

1.  Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation for Vertebral Compression Fractures: National Trends in the Medicare Population (2005-2015).

Authors:  Rana Rabei; Ketan Patel; Michael Ginsburg; Mikin V Patel; Ulku C Turba; Bulent Arslan; Osman Ahmed
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Cement augmentation techniques in traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures.

Authors:  F Cumhur Oner; Jorrit-Jan Verlaan; Abraham J Verbout; Wouter J A Dhert
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Bone bonding ability and handling properties of a titania-polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) composite bioactive bone cement modified with a unique PMMA powder.

Authors:  C Fukuda; K Goto; M Imamura; M Neo; T Nakamura
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  A bone substitute composed of polymethyl-methacrylate bone cement and Bio-Gene allogeneic bone promotes osteoblast viability, adhesion and differentiation.

Authors:  Zhikun Wang; Zaixue Li; Xiansen Zhang; Yingfeng Yu; Qingyu Feng; Jianting Chen; Wenwei Xie
Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 1.300

5.  Bioactive injectable polymethylmethacrylate/silicate bioceramic hybrid cements for percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Xin Sun; Zhi Wu; Dan He; Kangping Shen; Xingzhen Liu; Haiyan Li; Wenjie Jin
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-04-24

6.  Improving Polymethyl Methacrylate Resin Using a Novel Titanium Dioxide Coating.

Authors:  Ghaith Darwish; Su Huang; Kent Knoernschild; Cortino Sukotjo; Stephen Campbell; Arghya Kamal Bishal; Valentim Adelino Barão; Christine D Wu; Christos G Taukodis; Bin Yang
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  In vivo response to a low-modulus PMMA bone cement in an ovine model.

Authors:  Céline Robo; Gry Hulsart-Billström; Malin Nilsson; Cecilia Persson
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  Adjacent-level symptomatic fracture after percutaneous vertebral augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Yun-Tao Wang; Xiao-Tao Wu; Hui Chen; Chen Wang; Zu-Bin Mao
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 1.601

9.  Effect of vertebroplasty on the compressive strength of vertebral bodies.

Authors:  Spiros G Pneumaticos; Georgios K Triantafyllopoulos; Dimitrios S Evangelopoulos; John A Hipp; Michael H Heggeness
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Comparison of in vitro biocompatibility of silicone and polymethyl methacrylate during the curing phase of polymerization.

Authors:  Wei Song; Joseph Seta; Michael K Eichler; Jacobus J Arts; Bronek M Boszczyk; David C Markel; Alessandro Gasbarrini; Weiping Ren
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.368

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.