Literature DB >> 33855406

Differences in the quality of life of chronic kidney disease patients undergoing hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Ika Setyo Rini1, Titik Rahmayani2, Efris Kartika Sari1, Retno Lestari3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is defined as a progressive disease that causes renal failure and requires extended and long-term therapies. CKD patients need to choose one of these therapies to improve their quality of life. This study aims to investigate differences in the quality of life of chronic kidney disease patients undergoing hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). DESIGN AND METHODS: The study design used is similar to the cross-sectional design. Therefore, in this study observations were carried out, a EQ_5D life quality questionnaire sheet was administered to respondents, and a purposive sampling method was used. The total number of respondents was 250 and consisted of 125 hemodialysis and CAPD patients each.
RESULTS: The results obtained using the Mann Whitney method was a p-value (0.515)> α (0.05). These results also included five components, namely the ability to move/walk to an acceptable degree, adequate self-care, performance of usual activities, minimal amount of pain/discomfort during hemodialysis and CAPD, and acceptable levels of anxiety/sadness.
CONCLUSIONS: This research concludes that there is no difference in the quality of life between CKD patients  undergoing hemodialysis and CAPD.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33855406      PMCID: PMC8129769          DOI: 10.4081/jphr.2021.2209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Res        ISSN: 2279-9028


Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is becoming a global problem with increasing rates of incidences and high medical costs. However, previous studies regarding the risk factors of CKD are limited for low-income and middle-income countries.[1] CKD is also one of COVID-19 co-morbidities (they usually appear together). In older adults, several comorbidities are commonly found in patients diagnosed with COVID-19, examples are CKD, dementia, depression, and atrial fibrillation.[2] All CKD patients require a form of renal replacement therapy such as hemodialysis, CAPD, and kidney transplant. The prevalence of CKD stage 1 to 5 was 8.66% in African countries like Senegal, and Congo, 9.07% in Malaysia and 18.38% in Europe. Indonesia has no definite data on the prevalence of CKD, but Riset Kesehatan Dasar/Basic Health Research (Riskesdas) reported that 0.2% of Indonesia’s population suffered from this ailment in 2013. CKD is a progressive disease, therefore its treatment is costly, as it requires hemodialysis or other treatments to prevent death in the late stages. In 2017, among 30,831 new hemodialysis patients in Indonesia, more than 48.3% were diagnosed with hypertension or diabetes and 4% of them were having unknown etiology.[3] Renal replacement therapy is very beneficial to CKD patients because the kidneys are vital organs in the body which maintains homeostasis. However, dialysis therapy comes with its risks and side effects, as various problems and complications can occur in patients undergo the process. CKD sufferers must choose to go through therapy in order to survive the disease and prolong their lives. Dialysis is closely link to the quality of life the patient experiences because of the many complex problems associated with their illness. These problems can be physical, psychological, social, economic and spiritual. Quality of life is the sum of individuals’ perception of their abilities, limitations, symptoms and psychosocial characteristics. It can be defined based on culture and value systems and it plays a part in how people carry out their roles and functions. People suffering from CKD experience a decrease in their quality of life which affects their physical, mental and social well-being. However, social support may play an important role for these individuals.[4] In comparison with healthy individuals, hemodialysis (HD) patients have diminished their quality-of-life scores and negatively impact on the mental health. Many HD patients feel hopeless, worried with regards to additional burden of diseases, and loss of their independence.[5] Patients with chronic kidney disease tend to need employment to pay for their renal replacement therapy. This constitutes an important advantage for their employers as the patients will never miss work due to the health issues and the need for financial safety.[6] Therefore, this study aims to investigate differences in the quality of life of patients with CKD undergoing hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD).

Design and Methods

The research design used was similar to the cross-sectional approach carried out through observational study and the provision of the EQ_5D quality of life questionnaire sheet. Furthermore, the subjects used in this study were CKD patients undergoing hemodialysis and CAPD the hospital and were selected using a purposive sampling method. The total number of respondents were 250 people. This research was conducted from September to November 2019. The independent variables in this study are hemodialysis and CAPD, while the dependent variable is the level of quality of life. The instrument used for this study was the EuroQoL-5 Dimension questionnaire sheet (EQ-5D which had been tested for validity and reliability by previous researchers. Consequently, there were five questions in the questionnaire which covered several dimensions, such as the respondent’s ability to walk/move, self-care, activities involved in, level of pain/discomfort and level of anxiety/depression. Each dimension of the questionnaire had three closed answer options.[7] The data obtained was analyzed using the Mann Whitney statistical test to determine differences in quality of life of CKD patients undergoing hemodialysis and CAPD. In the Methods section, authors should state the authority which provided ethical approval for the study, along with a statement showing the informed consent of participants. The study or clinical trial registration number should also be provided, if applicable.

Results and Discussions

Table 1 shows a total of 250 respondents consisting of 125 hemodialysis patients and 125 patients undergoing CAPD. The majority of respondents were male, aged between 46-55 years, educated, private work, had been on hemodialysis for 3-6 years or CAPD for 1-3 years, and had no comorbidities. Table 2 describes that in general the overall quality of life of patients undergoing hemodialysis is at a good degree, with 103 people having an average score of 82.4%. Five components of quality of life were studied with the following results: 89 people (71.2%) had the ability to walk/move to a good degree, 116 people (92.8%) had good selfcare, 89 people (71.2%) were involved in activities to a good degree, and 83 people (66.4%) had some form of pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. 102 people (81.6%) undergoing CAPD had a good quality of life. These include those with the ability to walk/move to a good degree of people (68.8%), individuals with adequate self-care (85.6%), those that could perform activities to a good degree (68%) and people with good feelings of anxiety/depression 77.6%. Meanwhile, the pain/discomfort component was in moderate degrees of 51.2%. For patients on CAPD, peritoneal dialysis which is home-based automated could increase the quality of life better than any other forms of dialysis.[8]
Table 1.

General characteristics of respondents undergoing hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

IndicatorCategoryHemodialysisCAPD
n%n%
GenderMale6652.87156.8
Female5947.25443.2
Age17-25 years old21.675.6
26-35 years old129.61713.6
36-45 years old3326.43124.8
46-55 years old45363729.6
56-65 years old3326.43326.4
EducationPrimary School4132.81512
Junior High School1915.21915.2
Senior High School50404636.8
College15124536
ProfessionGovernment employees1310.41310.4
Pensionary10.8129.6
Farmer43.221.6
Private sector worker5443.26148.8
Housewife2620.82318.4
Unemployment2721.61411.2
Duration of therapy6-12 months2318.42923.2
1-3 years3024.05745.6
3-6 years4435.22217.6
6-9 years129.61512.0
9-12 years108.010.8
>12 years64.810.8
ComorbidityDM00108
HT1814.42822.4
Nephrolithiasis32.410.8
Heart disease0032.4
Hepatitis C32.410.8
Hepatitis B75.600
Other diseases541612.8
DM, HT86.41713.6
HT, CVD1310.454
HT, Hepatitis C64.821.6
HT, Hepatitis B97.200
DM, HT, Hep B43.200
DM, HT, CVD32.432.4
Nothing4636.83931.2

CAPD, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; DM, diabetes mellitus; HT, hypertension; CVD, cardiovascular disease.

Table 2.

Components of quality of life for hemodialysis and CAPD patients.

Components of quality of lifeCategoryHemodialysisCAPD
n%n%
Ability to walkGood8971.28668.8
Moderate3628.83628.8
Bad0032.4
Self-careGood11692.810785.6
Moderate97.21411.2
Bad0043.2
Usual activitiesGood8971.28568
Moderate3427.23024
Bad21.6108
Pain / discomfortGood6652.85846.4
Moderate5846.46451.2
Bad10.832.4
Anxiety /sadnessGood8366.49777.6
Moderate3931.22822.4
Bad32.400

CAPD, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

General characteristics of respondents undergoing hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. CAPD, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; DM, diabetes mellitus; HT, hypertension; CVD, cardiovascular disease. Table 3 shows that the QOL of hemodialysis patients and CAPD are the same, that is, they are in good degrees. Furthermore, the QOL of hemodialysis and CAPD patients were found to be 82.4% and 81.6% respectively. There is no significant difference between the five components of quality of life, namely the ability to walk/move, self-care, activities that can be done and anxiety / depression, all of which were in a good degree. However, the quality of life based on pain/discomfort for hemodialysis is mostly in good degrees about 66 people (52.8%), while CAPD had a moderate degree with 64 people (51.2%).
Table 3.

Comparison of quality of life for hemodialysis and CAPD patients.

Quality of lifeHemodialysisCAPD
n%n%
Good10382.410281.6
Moderate20161814.4
Bad21.654

CAPD, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

The difference is that hemodialysis patients without serious complications only feel pain twice a week during therapy. Furthermore, those that have been undergoing the treatment for a long time with adequate vascular access do not feel much pain at all and are more comfortable when they come to the hospital for hemodialysis. Meanwhile in CAPD, those that performed self-dialysis/ fluid changes frequently at home (four times a day), were more likely to feel discomfort because they were bound by time. Pain is sometimes reported when they undergo the fluid replacement process. Self-care was the component with the highest QOL value in this study. However in CAPD, about 3.2% of the subjects were poor in caring for themselves, while those in hemodialysis we’re not all in the good and moderate categories. It can then be concluded that in self-care, hemodialysis patients are more independent than CAPD. Self-care means that the patients take responsibility to care for themselves in each aspect of their mental, emotional, and spiritual needs. Patients with CAPD should be motivated and confident in self-care practices. Health professionals could also give certain educational programs to boost their self-efficacy to do self-care.[9-11] Quality of life based on activities that can be done by hemodialysis patients is slightly higher. Consequently, hemodialysis and CAPD patients that stated they were poor in their usual activities scored 1.6% and 8% respectively. This means that while carrying out daily activities, some of the respondents still need help from others even in small amounts. This component is considered significant enough for patients to achieve in improving their quality of life. On the psychological aspect, namely anxiety/sadness, most CAPD patients stated that there was no anxiety. Meanwhile, 2.4% of hemodialysis patients still felt sad and anxious. This can be because hemodialysis patients form strong social relationships and emotional bonds with each other and interact like siblings. Therefore, any death or decline will affect them psychologically even though death is a constant fear among CKD patients. Hemodialysis patients are prone to experience psychological issues and it may impact their quality of life. Emotional support is needed from friends and families so they can deal with the problems effectively.[12-14] Both hemodialysis and CAPD patients undergo dialysis which is meant to improve their quality of life. Although these diseases come with their comorbidities, it does not pose a problem as the patients are able to adapt to situations and have the support of family members. Acceptance can improve the quality of life of patients; thus health professionals could help patients to support their mental health and improve their coping strategies. In addition to this, accepting the disease means that the patients accept and let in all of the feelings with regards to the burden of diseases. Patients can put their faith to God and live at peace with the circumstances of their lives, no matter how difficult they are.[15-17] These results provide a better understanding of psychological determinants of a CKD patient’s quality of life. The results can further be investigated by nephrologists, which will lead to the development of specific psychological interventions, or other supporting public health services.[6] Components of quality of life for hemodialysis and CAPD patients. CAPD, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Comparison of quality of life for hemodialysis and CAPD patients. CAPD, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Results of Mann Whitney difference test analysis of quality of life for hemodialysis and CAPD patients. CAPD, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Chen et al. examined the relationship between hemodialysis adequacy and the quality of life of 67 hemodialysis patients in Taipei. The result show that the group which achieved hemodialysis adequacy had a higher quality of life than the inadequate group.[18] Furthermore, Rambod examined the relationship between the adequacy of hemodialysis patients in Iran and their quality of life; the result shows that there was a significant relationship between the two variables with a value of p=0.00.19 It can be concluded that adequate hemodialysis is one of the factors that play a role in improving the quality of life of patients, therefore it is an important indicator in the evaluation of hemodialysis.[20] Previous study revealed that there is a correlation between quality of life, morbidity and mortality in end-stage renal disease patients. This study suggested that the assessment of quality of life should consider several psychosocial aspects such as depression, the burden of illness, and other supports from families and friends to increase the quality of life.[21,22] Table 4 shows the results of statistical analysis using the Mann Whitney method, and the p value (0.515)> α (0.05) which was obtained. This means that there is no difference between the QOL of patients undergoing hemodialysis and those with CAPD in the hospital. Respondents state that every time they perform hemodialysis, the target Kt/V value is mostly achieved which helps improve their quality of life. Meanwhile, CAPD which is supposed to be more flexible and continuous during dialysis comes with co-morbidities and complications such as peritonitis, hernia and flow obstruction from CAPD access. Further, these conditions could affect the patients’ quality of life.[23-25]
Table 4.

Results of Mann Whitney difference test analysis of quality of life for hemodialysis and CAPD patients.

Kidney substitutionnMean rankp-value
Quality of lifeHemodialysis125122.630.515
CAPD125128.37

CAPD, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Conclusions

In conclusion, there was no difference in the quality of life between CKD patients undergoing hemodialysis and those having CAPD in the hospital. Furthermore, it is important for health workers to provide information about components of quality of life to patients and families with CKD who undergo hemodialysis and CAPD.
  21 in total

Review 1.  Quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease: focus on end-stage renal disease treated with hemodialysis.

Authors:  Paul L Kimmel; Samir S Patel
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.299

2.  Illness acceptance and quality of life among end state renal disease patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Authors:  Cut Sarida Pompey; Muhamad Nur Ridwan; Anggri Noorana Zahra; Sri Yona
Journal:  Enferm Clin       Date:  2019-07-05

3.  Chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular risk in six regions of the world (ISN-KDDC): a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Bogdan Ene-Iordache; Norberto Perico; Boris Bikbov; Sergio Carminati; Andrea Remuzzi; Annalisa Perna; Nazmul Islam; Rodolfo Flores Bravo; Mirna Aleckovic-Halilovic; Hequn Zou; Luxia Zhang; Zaghloul Gouda; Irma Tchokhonelidze; Georgi Abraham; Mitra Mahdavi-Mazdeh; Maurizio Gallieni; Igor Codreanu; Ariunaa Togtokh; Sanjib Kumar Sharma; Puru Koirala; Samyog Uprety; Ifeoma Ulasi; Giuseppe Remuzzi
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 26.763

Review 4.  Quality of life and psychological issues in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Susie Q Lew; Beth Piraino
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Improving quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease: influence of acceptance and personality.

Authors:  Carine Poppe; Geert Crombez; Ignace Hanoulle; Dirk Vogelaers; Mirko Petrovic
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 5.992

6.  Predictors of peritonitis and the impact of peritonitis on clinical outcomes of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients in Taiwan--10 years' experience in a single center.

Authors:  Yao-Peng Hsieh; Chia-Chu Chang; Yao-Ko Wen; Ping-Fang Chiu; Yu Yang
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  The psychosocial experience of patients with end-stage renal disease and its impact on quality of life: findings from a needs assessment to shape a service.

Authors:  Jennifer Finnegan-John; Veronica J Thomas
Journal:  ISRN Nephrol       Date:  2012-10-21

8.  Preexisting Comorbidities Predicting COVID-19 and Mortality in the UK Biobank Community Cohort.

Authors:  Janice L Atkins; Jane A H Masoli; Joao Delgado; Luke C Pilling; Chia-Ling Kuo; George A Kuchel; David Melzer
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 6.053

9.  Risk factors and outcomes of high peritonitis rate in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Yuanshi Tian; Xishao Xie; Shilong Xiang; Xin Yang; Xiaohui Zhang; Zhangfei Shou; Jianghua Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.