| Literature DB >> 33855229 |
Higemengist Astatkie1, Argaw Ambelu1, Embialle Mengistie Beyene2.
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the contamination source, level, and spatial distribution of globally alarming trace metals from Awetu watershed streams, southwestern Ethiopia. Surface water samples were collected from 20 sampling sites in December 2019. Water samples were collected in 500 ml polyethylene bottles previously washed with deionized water and rinsed with the sample to be collected from different stretches and acidified with 5 ml concentrated nitric acid. The samples were digested with open acid digestion and the contents of the metal were analysed using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) ranged from 18 - 351 μg/L for As, 5-19 μg/L for Cd, 232-421 μg/L for Cr, 314-920 μg/L for Pb and 10-16 μg/L for Hg. The highest concentrations of As were detected at K3, Cd at K2, Pb and Cr at D4, and Hg at D5. Analysis of variance results revealed that the Cd concentrations were statistically significant among all the streams except for Boye. Streams found at the center of Jimma city with effluents emanated from Jimma University, garage maintenances, car-wash and agricultural areas had higher values than the streams in the periphery. This study concluded that a higher concentration of trace elements is associated with the type of waste entering the streams. Trace elements concentration in the watershed is to the level that can pose a risk to downstream users. Public awareness creation to establish waste management systems and river quality monitoring should be implemented to minimize the public health risk and deterioration of the aquatic ecosystem.Entities:
Keywords: Heavy metals; Pollution distribution; Surface water pollution; Watershed streams
Year: 2021 PMID: 33855229 PMCID: PMC8027692 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06385
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Description of Awetu watershed streams with their major anthropogenic activities in the sampling sites.
| Stream Name | Sampling Code | Major anthropogenic activities of the site |
|---|---|---|
| Awetu | A1 | Agricultural activities and grazing |
| A2 | Agricultural activities, grazing, washing clothes, and bathing | |
| A3 | Horticulture, recreational, residential and commercial, vehicle traffic and agricultural runoff | |
| A4 | Washing, swimming and fetching water for household consumption | |
| A5 | Vehicle traffic, washing, car washing, and seedling plantation | |
| A6 | Crossing asphalt road, high vehicle traffic, residential area and small scale industries of the town enters into this stream before it. | |
| Dololo | D1 | Public institutions, domestic activities, vehicle traffic, hospital, chemical and biological laboratories, and construction sites. |
| D2 | Car washing, small scale enterprises like garages, woodwork, and vehicle traffic. | |
| D3 | Commercial area, high vehicle traffic, garages, gas/petrol station and seepage | |
| D4 | Car washing, gas/fuel station, garages, residential and commercial and seepage | |
| D5 | Commercial, recreational, vehicle traffic, bus park, gas/petrol station, cement stores, metal works and fabrications, and seepage | |
| Kitto | K1 | Institutional wastes, waste stabilization pond, wood and metalwork enterprise, garage, car washing, agricultural activities, and bridge. |
| K2 | Residential, commercial, garage, seepage and agricultural activities | |
| K3 | Residential, commercial, seepage, agricultural activities, and airport | |
| K4 | Grazing, agricultural activities and small scale enterprises like garages | |
| K5 | Solid waste dump sites, horticulture, residential and vehicle traffic | |
| Boye | B1 | Car washing, vehicle traffic, residential and commercial area |
| B2 | Agriculture runoff, irrigation, and residential area | |
| B3 | Irrigation, agricultural runoff, slaughterhouse, and residential area | |
| B4 | Wetland, grazing, agricultural activities, fishing and recreational |
Figure 1Sampling points along streams at Awetu watershed (Generated from ArcGIS 10.3 (ESRI, Redlands, California, USA)).
Physico-chemical properties of water samples in Awetu watershed streams.
| Site | Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) | Electric Conductivity (μS/cm) | pH | Turbidity (NTU) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Average ±SD) | (Average ±SD) | (Average ±SD) | (Average ±SD) | |
| A1 | 7.09 ± 0.03 | 62.30 ± 0.46 | 7.59 ± 0.14 | 50.50 ± 1.76 |
| A2 | 6.71 ± 0.17 | 62.30 ± 0.59 | 7.60 ± 0.20 | 52.10 ± 1.50 |
| A3 | 6.70 ± 0.04 | 66.30 ± 3.31 | 7.58 ± 0.02 | 60.70 ± 0.10 |
| A4 | 7.28 ± 0.01 | 69.30 ± 0.83 | 7.42 ± 0.09 | 106.00 ± 0.87 |
| A5 | 7.01 ± 0.04 | 85.60 ± 1.85 | 7.05 ± 0.01 | 71.20 ± 1.06 |
| A6 | 3.33 ± 0.03 | 131.40 ± 2.47 | 7.03 ± 0.02 | 51.90 ± 1.54 |
| D1 | 3.59 ± 0.38 | 407.00 ± 3.21 | 7.01 ± 0.005 | 11.97 ± 0.77 |
| D2 | 4.18 ± 0.32 | 299.00 ± 1.84 | 7.43 ± 0.19 | 26.60 ± 1.01 |
| D3 | 4.96 ± 0.52 | 250.00 ± 3.00 | 7.49 ± 0.09 | 302.00 ± 1.00 |
| D4 | 3.80 ± 0.46 | 313.00 ± 1.62 | 7.43 ± 0.19 | 65.30 ± 0.56 |
| D5 | 3.78 ± 0.54 | 343.00 ± 2.35 | 7.40 ± 0.15 | 14.73 ± 0.95 |
| K1 | 6.27 ± 0.78 | 84.40 ± 1.34 | 5.82 ± 0.26 | 276.00 ± 1.26 |
| K2 | 5.99 ± 0.69 | 82.10 ± 1.56 | 7.27 ± 0.13 | 189.00 ± 1.49 |
| K3 | 5.25 ± 0.23 | 90.10 ± 2.94 | 7.03 ± 0.09 | 128.00 ± 0.87 |
| K4 | 5.20 ± 0.16 | 201.00 ± 2.20 | 7.23 ± 0.09 | 8.02 ± 0,90 |
| K5 | 4.96 ± 0.65 | 250.00 ± 1.80 | 7.49 ± 0.06 | 302.00 ± 0.96 |
| B1 | 3.49 ± 0.51 | 93.40 ± 2.12 | 6.79 ± 0.08 | 54.90 ± 0.47 |
| B2 | 3.24 ± 0.10 | 87.30 ± 1.41 | 6.85 ± 0.04 | 19.40 ± 0.60 |
| B3 | 3.79 ± 0.15 | 87.80 ± 1.68 | 6.88 ± 0.08 | 31.80 ± 0.26 |
| B4 | 3.68 ± 0.11 | 105.30 ± 1.77 | 6.78 ± 0.09 | 26.40 ± 0.44 |
SD = Standard Deviation, mg/L = milligram per liter, μS/cm = micro siemens per centimeter and NTU = nephelometric turbidity unit.
Heavy metal concentrations in water (μg/L) were collected from each sampling site in Awetu watershed streams.
| Sites | As | Cd | Cr | Pb | Hg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | 133 | 16 | 331 | 314 | 10 |
| A2 | 175 | 14 | 393 | 689 | 11 |
| A3 | 18 | 11 | 355 | 858 | 10 |
| A4 | 181 | 15 | 302 | 569 | 14 |
| A5 | 124 | 6 | 232 | 524 | 12 |
| A6 | 71 | 10 | 320 | 581 | 15 |
| D1 | 253 | 5 | 386 | 641 | 10 |
| D2 | 173 | 11 | 376 | 736 | 12 |
| D3 | 341 | 8 | 363 | 464 | 12 |
| D4 | 158 | 7 | 421 | 920 | 11 |
| D5 | 303 | 6 | 404 | 628 | 16 |
| K1 | 165 | 15 | 313 | 498 | 12 |
| K2 | 106 | 19 | 312 | 338 | 14 |
| K3 | 351 | 16 | 338 | 491 | 11 |
| K4 | 151 | 14 | 363 | 592 | 13 |
| K5 | 197 | 16 | 330 | 419 | 10 |
| B1 | 222 | 11 | 306 | 689 | 13 |
| B2 | 64 | 13 | 325 | 492 | 12 |
| B3 | 23 | 11 | 315 | 721 | 11 |
| B4 | 257 | 10 | 407 | 694 | 12 |
| Mean ± SD | 173 ± 95 | 12 ± 3.9 | 345 ± 45.6 | 593 ± 157.5 | 12 ± 1.7 |
| BC | 133 | 16 | 331 | 314 | 10 |
| WRW | 0.02 | 0.01 | 1 | 1 | 0.07 |
| USEPA | 1 | 2 | 11 | 3 | 1.8 |
| TRV | 150 | 5 | 11 | 3 | 2 |
SD is the standard deviation, BC - Background Concentration (this study), TRV - Traceity Reference Value for freshwater proposed by USEPA (USEPA, 2004), United States Environmental Protection Authority (USEPA, 2004), WRW - World River Water (Khan et al., 2005)
Figure 2Spatial distribution of trace element concentrations (μg/L) in surface water samples in the Awetu watershed streams.
ANOVA analysis for trace metal concentrations and physicochemical properties between streams in the Awetu watershed.
| ANOVA | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As | Between Groups | 51342.000 | 3 | 17114.000 | 2.281 | .118 |
| Within Groups | 120038.200 | 16 | 7502.388 | |||
| Total | 171380.200 | 19 | ||||
| Cd | Between Groups | 186.250 | 3 | 62.083 | 9.034 | |
| Within Groups | 109.950 | 16 | 6.872 | |||
| Total | 296.200 | 19 | ||||
| Cr | Between Groups | 14384.417 | 3 | 4794.806 | 3.062 | .058 |
| Within Groups | 25054.383 | 16 | 1565.899 | |||
| Total | 39438.800 | 19 | ||||
| Pb | Between Groups | 127212.967 | 3 | 42404.322 | 1.973 | .159 |
| Within Groups | 343830.833 | 16 | 21489.427 | |||
| Total | 471043.800 | 19 | ||||
| Hg | Between Groups | .150 | 3 | .050 | .015 | .997 |
| Within Groups | 54.800 | 16 | 3.425 | |||
| Total | 54.950 | 19 | ||||
| DO | Between Groups | 29.584 | 3 | 9.861 | 5.209 | |
| Within Groups | 30.288 | 16 | 1.893 | |||
| Total | 59.873 | 19 | ||||
| EC | Between Groups | 199461.875 | 3 | 66487.292 | 32.755 | |
| Within Groups | 30447.483 | 15 | 2029.832 | |||
| Total | 229909.358 | 18 | ||||
| pH | Between Groups | 1.498 | 3 | .499 | 4.094 | |
| Within Groups | 1.951 | 16 | .122 | |||
| Total | 3.450 | 19 | ||||
| Turbidity | Between Groups | 21713.097 | 3 | 7237.699 | 1.034 | .404 |
| Within Groups | 112002.176 | 16 | 7000.136 | |||
| Total | 133715.272 | 19 | ||||
The ANOVA test result written in bold in the table 4 shows significant difference of the studied parameters between the streams in the watershed. i.e The concentration of Cd showed statistically significant differences between Dololo and Kitto streams (p < 0.001); DO showed statistically significant difference between Awetu and Dololo, and Awetu and Boye stream (p < 0.05). EC showed statistically significant difference between Awetu and Dololo, and Awetu and Boye stream (p < 0.001) and pH showed statistically significant difference between Awetu and Dololo, and Awetu and Boye stream (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Tukey HSD test output showing the 95% stream-wise confidence level of the contaminants.
Pearson correlation coefficient matrix for trace elements and physico-chemical characteristics in Awetu watershed channelized stream waters (n = 20).
| As | Cr | Pb | Cd | Hg | DO | EC | pH | Turbidity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As | 1 | ||||||||
| Cr | 0.37 | 1 | |||||||
| Pb | -0.15 | 1 | |||||||
| Cd | -0.19 | -0.28 | 1 | ||||||
| Hg | 0.10 | -0.10 | -0.10 | -0.07 | 1 | ||||
| DO | -0.09 | -0.36 | -0.25 | 0.37 | -0.07 | 1 | |||
| EC | 0.30 | 0.06 | -0.14 | -0.06 | -0.23 | 1 | |||
| pH | 0.01 | 0.32 | 0.18 | -0.13 | 0.02 | 0.22 | 0.09 | 1 | |
| Turbidity | 0.26 | -0.23 | -0.39 | 0.24 | 0.07 | 0.05 | -0.23 | 1 |
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Figure 4Dendrogram of hierarchical clustering analyses showing the relevant association among the parameters in waters of the study area.
Figure 5PCA biplot of trace metal and physicochemical characteristics of water samples from Awetu Watershed, Southwestern Ethiopia. The color bar indicates the variable contribution (degree of loading) to the plot.
The loadings of the variables and correlation between variables and the PC scores.
| Component | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| DO | -0.685 | 0.019 | 0.488 |
| EC | 0.774 | 0.434 | 0.033 |
| pH | 0.187 | 0.084 | 0.760 |
| Turbidity | -0.481 | 0.679 | -0.004 |
| As | 0.307 | 0.811 | -0.077 |
| Cd | -0.766 | 0.096 | 0.165 |
| Cr | 0.751 | 0.201 | 0.325 |
| Pb | 0.682 | -0.500 | 0.158 |
| Hg | 0.060 | 0.039 | -0.625 |
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.