| Literature DB >> 33854470 |
Giovanni Savini1, Carlo Asteggiano1,2, Matteo Paoletti1, Stefano Parravicini2, Elena Pezzotti2, Francesca Solazzo1, Shaun I Muzic2, Francesco Santini3,4, Xeni Deligianni3,4, Alice Gardani5, Giancarlo Germani1, Lisa M Farina1, Niels Bergsland6,7, Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott2,8,9, Angela Berardinelli5, Stefano Bastianello1,2, Anna Pichiecchio1,2.
Abstract
Introduction: <span class="Chemical">Nusinersen is a recent promising therapy approved for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), a rare disease characterized by the degeneration of alpha motor neurons (αMN) in the spinal cord (SC) leading to progressive muscle atrophy and dysfunction. Muscle and cervical SC quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) has never been used to monitor drug treatment in SMA. The aim of this pilot study is to investigate whether qMRI can provide useful biomarkers for monitoring treatment efficacy in SMA.Entities:
Keywords: motor neuron degeneration; muscle MRI; muscle fat fraction; nusinersen (spinraza); quantitative magnetic resonance imaging; spinal cord atrophy and degeneration; spinal muscular atrophy; treatment monitoring
Year: 2021 PMID: 33854470 PMCID: PMC8039452 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.613834
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Main clinical features of the enrolled patients.
| Age at BL (years) | 27 | 21 | 21 |
| Age at onset (months) | 24–36 | 12–24 | 31 |
| Family history | - | - | One maternal uncle affected by genetically proven 5q SMA |
| Symptoms at onset | Walking impairment, frequent falls, problems in rising from the floor | Asked to be carried, used her upper limbs to better move lower limbs | Waddling gait |
| Clinical peculiarities | - | Strength asymmetry in upper limbs (left < right) | - |
| Age at diagnosis (years) | 6 (molecular diagnosis) | 3 | 3 |
| SMN2 copies ( | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| Age at loss of ambulation (years) | - (still ambulatory) | 16 | 19 |
| Respiratory problems/scoliosis | No/No | No/No | No/Yes (no surgery) |
| Treatment duration at TP6 (months) | 21 | 21 | 21 |
BL, baseline.
Patient 3 started using a wheelchair for outdoor at 4; she was still able to move a few steps with support until the age of 11.
Figure 1Longitudinal clinical scores. HFMSE and RULM scores of SMA patients are shown on the left and right, respectively, starting from the baseline when treatment began (TP1), up to the end of the follow-up 21 months later (TP6). Loading doses of nusinersen were administered between TP1 and TP2 and the following maintenance doses corresponded to displayed time points (TP2 to TP6) 4 months apart. HFMSE, Hammersmith functional motor scale expanded; RULM, revised upper limb module; BL, baseline; TP, time point.
Per-compartment quantitative muscle MRI measures.
| (A) Average Fat fraction (FF) percentage for each compartment (anterior, medial, and posterior) and for the global ROI at baseline (TP1) and at the end of follow-up (TP6). Left and right sides are averaged. The increase/decrease (delta) is reported as percentage. | ||||
| TP1 | 51.2 | 54.3 | 45.8 | 50 |
| TP6 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 54.5 | 57 |
| Delta | +10.9% | +5.1% | +19.8% | +14% |
| (B) Average w-T2 in ms for each compartment (anterior, medial, and posterior) and for the global ROI at baseline (TP1) and at the end of the follow-up (TP6). Left and right sides are averaged. The increase/decrease (delta) is reported as percentage. | ||||
| TP1 | 43.7 | 44.4 | 30.4 | 43.73 |
| TP6 | 42.6 | 41.1 | 28.1 | 41.68 |
| Delta | −2.4% | −7.2% | −0.6% | −4.7% |
Figure 2Thigh muscle regions of interest. Example of manually drawn muscle ROIs at middle thigh level, superimposed on the T2 GRE sequence (Patient 2 at TP1). On top (A), the 12 muscle ROIs are individually displayed with different colors; at the bottom (B), the global ROI comprising all muscles is shown. The 12 ROIs include VL, vastus lateralis; VM, vastus medialis; VI, vastus intermedius; RF, rectus femoralis; S, Sartorius; G, gracilis; AM, adductor magnus; AL, adductor longus; SM, semimembranous; SM, semitendinosus; BFL, biceps femoris longus head.
Figure 3Exemplary spinal cord MRI dataset. On the left, T2w image with vertebral labels from C2 to D3. Top row: T1w image; T2w image; T2*w image; detail of T2*w image with WM and GM segmentation masks. Bottom row: MT (MT-off, MT-on and MT-T1w) and DWI (mean b0 image and mean DWI) dataset.
Figure 4Cross-sectional comparison of CSA values measured on T2w images at TP3. Top left: average SC CSA from C2 to D3 in HC (box on the left) and SMA patients (dots on the right). Top right: per-level SC CSA values from C2 to D3 in HC (boxes) and SMA patients (black lines). Bottom left: average SC CSA from C2 to C7. Bottom right: average SC CSA from D1 to D3. The color of patient dots relates to their position compared to the respective distribution of HC values: blue for patient values within the 25–75th percentile range, magenta for patient values outside the 25–75th percentile range but within the HC distribution, red for patient values outside the HC distribution. Red + represent outlier HCs.
Figure 5Cross-sectional comparison of CSA values measured on T2*w images at TP3. From left to right and top to bottom: average CSA values of SC, GM, VHs, and WM measured from C3 to C4 in HC (box on the left) and SMA patients (dots on the right). The color coding of patient dots is explained in the caption of Figure 4. Red + represent outlier HCs.
Figure 6Cross-sectional comparison of average FA values measured at TP3. From left to right: average FA values of GM, VHs, IZ, DHs, WM, vCST, lCST, and FG measured from C3 to C4 in HC (box on the left) and SMA patients (dots on the right). The color coding of patient dots is explained in the caption of Figure 4. Red + represent outlier HCs.
Figure 7Cross-sectional comparison of average RD values measured at TP3. From left to right: average RD values of GM, VHs, IZ, DHs, WM, vCST, lCST, and FG measured from C3 to C4 in HC (box on the left) and SMA patients (dots on the right). The color coding of patient dots is explained in the caption of Figure 4. Red + represent outlier HCs.
Figure 8Cross-sectional comparison of average MTsat values measured at TP3. From left to right: average MTsat values of GM, VHs, IZ, DHs, WM, vCST, lCST, and FG measured from C3 to C4 in HC (box on the left) and SMA patients (dots on the right). The color coding of patient dots is explained in the caption of Figure 4. Red + represent outlier HCs.
Figure 9Longitudinal analysis of average CSA values measured on T2*w images. From left to right and top to bottom: average CSA values of SC, GM, VHs, and WM measured from C3 to C4 starting from TP3 to TP6.
Figure 10Longitudinal analysis of average MTsat values. From left to right and top to bottom: average MTsat values of GM, VHs, IZ, DHs, WM, vCST, lCST, and FG measured from C3 to C4 starting from TP3 to TP6.