| Literature DB >> 33853533 |
Yue Li1, Qingju Liu1,2, Chengdong Kang3, Weijing Cui4, Zichuan Xu3, Fu Zhong3, Xia Gao5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the expression characteristics of ANGPTL8 in patients with primary nephrotic syndrome and its possible correlation with hyperlipidemia and proteinuria.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33853533 PMCID: PMC8045271 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-021-02350-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
Anthropometric and laboratory characteristics of healthy individuals and patients with PNS
| Variables | PNS | Controls | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (F/M) | 94 / 39 | 40 / 20 | 0.576 |
| Age (years) | 33.23 ± 20.16 | 36.05 ± 16.40 | 0.276 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.94 ± 2.78 | 22.24 ± 1.75 | 0.051 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 120.00 (107.50, 129.00) | 117.00 (108.25, 126.75) | 0.466 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 73.39 ± 10.03 | 73.50 ± 8.32 | 0.941 |
| CHOL (mmol/L) | 8.25 (6.42, 10.33) | 4.39 (3.74, 4.95) | < 0.001* |
| TG (mmol/L) | 2.77 (1.91, 3.29) | 1.11 (0.96, 1.43) | < 0.001* |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.66 (1.25, 1.98) | 1.31 (1.19, 1.48) | < 0.001* |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 5.11 (3.61, 6.64) | 2.51 (2.13, 2.91) | < 0.001* |
| ALB (g/L) | 23.40 (17.90, 28.95) | 46.25 (44.13, 47.96) | < 0.001* |
| CREA (μmol/L) | 62.50 (46.60, 78.10) | 58.65 (50.13, 76.15) | 0.891 |
| Ur (mmol/L) | 6.10 (4.50, 8.30) | 4.26 (3.67, 5.39) | < 0.001* |
| Urine protein | 1 ~ 4 | ngegative | < 0.001* |
| 24hUTP (g/d) | 5.989 (2.297, 9.140) | – | |
| Serum ANGPTL8 (ng/ml)a | 28.29 (22.31, 31.30) | 23.21 (19.55, 25.11) | < 0.001* |
| Urine ANGPTL8 (ng/ml)a | 42.36 (37.45, 76.44) | 36.38 (33.59, 39.41) | < 0.001* |
F: female, M: male. In the qualitative test of urine protein, ‘0’ represents ‘-’, ‘1’ represents ‘+’, ‘2’ represents ‘++’, ‘3’ represents ‘+++’, ‘4’ represents ‘++++’
* P < 0.05 was considered significant
Fig. 1Comparison of serum ANGPTL8 levels box-plot between PNS group and control group, patients with PNS had significantly higher serum ANGPTL8 levels than healthy controls (P < 0.001)
Fig. 2Comparison of urine ANGPTL8 levels box-plot between PNS group and control group, patients with PNS had significantly higher urine ANGPTL8 levels than healthy controls (P < 0.001)
Comparison of ANGPTL8 levels of PNS patients by treatment condition
| Treatment condition | Serum ANGPTL8 | Urine ANGPTL8/UCr |
|---|---|---|
| Untreated( | 28.44 (22.71, 30.84) | 56.31 (37.53, 101.51) |
| Treated ( | 26.70 (21.53, 32.52) | 60.18 (44.20, 107.56) |
| 0.926 | 0.345 |
Comparison of ANGPTL8 levels in PNS patients by varying degrees of proteinuria
| Degree of proteinuria | Serum ANGPTL8 | Urine ANGPTL8/UCr |
|---|---|---|
| Mild (n = 8) | 23.53 (14.97, 29.29) | 74.17 (34.63, 178.57) |
| Moderate ( | 28.19 (22.43, 31.07) | 89.72 (45.28, 133.80) |
| Severe ( | 28.40 (22.34, 32.22) | 50.47 (38.54, 80.20) |
| 0.283 | 0.019 |
* The significance values were adjusted by Bonferroni correction, which was statistically significant compared with the severe proteinuria (P < 0.05)
Correlation between ANGPTL8 levels and main clinical indicators in patients with PNS
| Variables | Serum ANGPTL8 | Urine ANGPTL8/UCr | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | r | |||
| CHOL | 0.209 | 0.016* | 0.073 | 0.406 |
| TG | 0.412 | 0.000* | 0.036 | 0.682 |
| HDL-C | 0.065 | 0.445 | 0.201 | 0.020* |
| LDL-C | 0.129 | 0.140 | 0.113 | 0.193 |
| ALB | −0.027 | 0.757 | −0.068 | 0.434 |
| CREA | −0.017 | 0.845 | − 0.323 | 0.000* |
| Ur | 0.115 | 0.188 | −0.089 | 0.309 |
| eGFR | −0.137 (− 0.119) | 0.116 (0.813) | 0.016 (0.352) | 0.853 |
| 24hUTP | 0.087 | 0.321 | −0.268 | 0.002* |
| BMI | −0.069 | 0.461 | −0.206 | 0.028* |
Spearman’s correlation analysis was used
r: Spearman’s correlation coefficient
* P value < 0.05 was significant correlation
Comparison of ANGPTL8 levels of PNS patients by different pathological types
| Pathological types | Serum ANGPTL8 | Urine ANGPTL8/UCr |
|---|---|---|
| MCD ( | 25.76 ± 9.09 | 52.78 (44.21, 86.77) |
| MsPGN (n = 8) | 26.42 ± 5.72 | 91.68 (53.16, 130.32) |
| MN ( | 26.00 ± 9.47 | 45.08 (31.06, 69.86) |
| FSGS ( | 27.13 ± 6.79 | 76.01 (35.64, 134.98) |
| 0.977 | 0.010 |
* The significance values were adjusted by Bonferroni correction, which was statistically significant compared with the MN group (P < 0.05)