| Literature DB >> 30611256 |
Ke-Wei Wang1,2,3,4, Bai-Quan Xiao5,6,7, Bi-Hai Li5,6,7, Yi-Yan Liu5,6,7, Zhi-Yuan Wei1,2,3,4, Jun-Hua Rao8,9,10, Jian-Huan Chen11,12,13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Excess energy intake contributes to metabolic disorders. However, the relationship between excess sugar and fat in their contributions to metabolic abnormalities remains to be further elucidated. Here we conducted a prospective feeding experiment to evaluate effects of dietary fat-to-sugar ratio on diet-induced metabolic abnormalities in adult cynomolgus monkeys.Entities:
Keywords: Cynomolgus monkey; Fasting glucose; High-fat diet; High-sugar diet; Lipid abnormality
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30611256 PMCID: PMC6320598 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-018-0950-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
The percentage by weight of compositions in the regular chow
| Chow diet | Weight (%) |
|---|---|
| Protein | 22.2 |
| Fat | 6.9 |
| Carbohydrate | 49.0 |
| Crude ash | 6.5 |
| Lysine | 0.8 |
| Calcium | 1.1 |
| Water and other volatile products | 9.7 |
| Coarse fiber | 3.7 |
Composition of emulsion with excess sugar and fat in the four groups
| HSHF (kcal/ml) | HSLF (kcal/ml) | LSHF (kcal/ml) | LSLF (kcal/ml) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excess sugar (sucrose) | 1.55 | 1.55 | 0.77 | 0.77 |
| Excess fat (lard) | 3.60 | 1.80 | 3.60 | 1.80 |
| Total caloric intake / ml | 5.15 kcal/ml | 3.35 kcal/ ml | 4.37 kcal/ ml | 2.57 kcal/ml |
HS/HF High-sugar/high-fat, HS/LF, High-sugar/low-fat, LS/HF Low-sugar/high-fat, LS/LF Low-sugar/low-fat
In addition to a daily regular chow, monkeys in the four groups were fed excess sugar and fat described above at a dose of 5 ml/kg of body weight six days per week
Fig. 1Mean changes in body weight, fasting glucose and lipid profiles among four groups with different ratio of excess fat and sugar throughout the 7-month intervention. The monkeys in the four groups were fed regular chow plus emulsion with different ratio of excess fat and sugar. Results are shown for body weight (a), fasting glucose (b), total cholesterol (TC) c), triglyceride (TG) (d), HDL-C (e), LDL-C (f). Data are based on mixed-model analysis of variance. The P value at the upper or lower left indicates the test of whether the change between baseline and intervention period (mean of every two months) differed significantly between cynomolgus monkeys assigned to four groups. The P values for the comparison between the LSLF group and the HSLF group are 0.733 for total cholesterol and 0.934 for LDL-C cholesterol. The P values for the comparison between the LSLF group and the LSHF group are 0.0001 for TC and 0.0001 for LDL. The P values for the comparison between the HS/LF group and the HSHF group are 0.898 for TC and 0.885 for LDL. The P values for the comparison between the LS/HF group and the HSHF group are 0.0001 for total cholesterol and 0.0001 for LDL-C cholesterol. *p < 0.05
Fig. 2Forest plots showing excess sugar×fat interaction model estimates by five time points. ES stand for adjusted mean differences after analysis of linear mixed effects models adjusting body weight by time. Panel (a) shows mean differences of TC between HS and LS combined with HF or LF, Panel (b) shows mean differences of TC between HF and LF combined with HS or LS, Panel (c) shows mean differences of LDL-C between HS and LS combined with HF or LF, Panel (d) shows mean differences of LDL-C between HF and LF combined with HS or LS