| Literature DB >> 33853405 |
Xuefeng Yan1, Sanjay Telu1, Rachel M Dick1, Jeih-San Liow1, Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara1, Cheryl L Morse1, Lester S Manly1, Robert L Gladding1, Stal Shrestha1, Walter Lerchner2, Yuji Nagai3, Takafumi Minamimoto3, Sami S Zoghbi1, Robert B Innis1, Victor W Pike1, Barry J Richmond2, Mark Ag Eldridge2.
Abstract
Previous work found that [11C]deschloroclozapine ([11C]DCZ) is superior to [11C]clozapine ([11C]CLZ) for imaging Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs (DREADDs). This study used PET to quantitatively and separately measure the signal from transfected receptors, endogenous receptors/targets, and non-displaceable binding in other brain regions to better understand this superiority. A genetically-modified muscarinic type-4 human receptor (hM4Di) was injected into the right amygdala of a male rhesus macaque. [11C]DCZ and [11C]CLZ PET scans were conducted 2-24 months later. Uptake was quantified relative to the concentration of parent radioligand in arterial plasma at baseline (n = 3 scans/radioligand) and after receptor blockade (n = 3 scans/radioligand). Both radioligands had greater uptake in the transfected region and displaceable uptake in other brain regions. Displaceable uptake was not uniformly distributed, perhaps representing off-target binding to endogenous receptor(s). After correction, [11C]DCZ signal was 19% of that for [11C]CLZ, and background uptake was 10% of that for [11C]CLZ. Despite stronger [11C]CLZ binding, the signal-to-background ratio for [11C]DCZ was almost two-fold greater than for [11C]CLZ. Both radioligands had comparable DREADD selectivity. All reference tissue models underestimated signal-to-background ratio in the transfected region by 40%-50% for both radioligands. Thus, the greater signal-to-background ratio of [11C]DCZ was due to its lower background uptake.Entities:
Keywords: Clozapine; Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs; compartmental modeling; deschloroclozapine; positron emission tomography
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33853405 PMCID: PMC8504956 DOI: 10.1177/0271678X211007949
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab ISSN: 0271-678X Impact factor: 6.200