Literature DB >> 33852003

Validation of a Clinical Decision Rule to Predict Abuse in Young Children Based on Bruising Characteristics.

Mary Clyde Pierce1,2, Kim Kaczor1, Douglas J Lorenz3, Gina Bertocci4, Amanda K Fingarson2,5, Kathi Makoroff6, Rachel P Berger7, Berkeley Bennett8,9, Julia Magana10,11, Shannon Staley12,13, Veena Ramaiah12, Kristine Fortin2,5,14, Melissa Currie15, Bruce E Herman16, Sandra Herr17, Kent P Hymel18, Carole Jenny19, Karen Sheehan1,2, Noel Zuckerbraun7, Sheila Hickey20, Gabriel Meyers8, John M Leventhal21.   

Abstract

Importance: Bruising caused by physical abuse is the most common antecedent injury to be overlooked or misdiagnosed as nonabusive before an abuse-related fatality or near-fatality in a young child. Bruising occurs from both nonabuse and abuse, but differences identified by a clinical decision rule may allow improved and earlier recognition of the abused child. Objective: To refine and validate a previously derived bruising clinical decision rule (BCDR), the TEN-4 (bruising to torso, ear, or neck or any bruising on an infant <4.99 months of age), for identifying children at risk of having been physically abused. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from December 1, 2011, to March 31, 2016, at emergency departments of 5 urban children's hospitals. Children younger than 4 years with bruising were identified through deliberate examination. Statistical analysis was completed in June 2020. Exposures: Bruising characteristics in 34 discrete body regions, patterned bruising, cumulative bruise counts, and patient's age. The BCDR was refined and validated based on these variables using binary recursive partitioning analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Injury from abusive vs nonabusive trauma was determined by the consensus judgment of a multidisciplinary expert panel.
Results: A total of 21 123 children were consecutively screened for bruising, and 2161 patients (mean [SD] age, 2.1 [1.1] years; 1296 [60%] male; 1785 [83%] White; 1484 [69%] non-Hispanic/Latino) were enrolled. The expert panel achieved consensus on 2123 patients (98%), classifying 410 (19%) as abuse and 1713 (79%) as nonabuse. A classification tree was fit to refine the rule and validated via bootstrap resampling. The resulting BCDR was 95.6% (95% CI, 93.0%-97.3%) sensitive and 87.1% (95% CI, 85.4%-88.6%) specific for distinguishing abuse from nonabusive trauma based on body region bruised (torso, ear, neck, frenulum, angle of jaw, cheeks [fleshy], eyelids, and subconjunctivae), bruising anywhere on an infant 4.99 months and younger, or patterned bruising (TEN-4-FACESp). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, an affirmative finding for any of the 3 BCDR TEN-4-FACESp components in children younger than 4 years indicated a potential risk for abuse; these results warrant further evaluation. Clinical application of this tool has the potential to improve recognition of abuse in young children with bruising.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33852003     DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


  8 in total

1.  Screening for pediatric abusive head trauma: Are three variables enough?

Authors:  Kent P Hymel; Wouter Karst; Mark Marinello; Bruce E Herman; Terra N Frazier; Christopher L Carroll; Veronica Armijo-Garcia; Matthew Musick; Kerri Weeks; Suzanne B Haney; Afshin Pashai; Ming Wang
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2022-01-22

2.  The CAPNET multi-center data set for child physical abuse: Rationale, methods and scope.

Authors:  Devon M Kratchman; Porcia Vaughn; Ligia Batista Silverman; Kristine A Campbell; Daniel M Lindberg; James D Anderst; Angela N Bachim; Rachel P Berger; Kent P Hymel; Megan Letson; John D Melville; Joanne N Wood
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2022-06-27

3.  Development and Validation of a Natural Language Processing Tool to Identify Injuries in Infants Associated With Abuse.

Authors:  Gunjan Tiyyagura; Andrea G Asnes; John M Leventhal; Eugene D Shapiro; Marc Auerbach; Wei Teng; Emily Powers; Amy Thomas; Daniel M Lindberg; Justin McClelland; Carol Kutryb; Thomas Polzin; Karen Daughtridge; Virginia Sevin; Allen L Hsiao
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 2.993

4.  Approach considerations for the management of strangulation in the emergency department.

Authors:  Samuel J Stellpflug; William Weber; Ann Dietrich; Brian Springer; Robin Polansky; Carolyn Sachs; Antony Hsu; Sarayna McGuire; Casey Gwinn; Gael Strack; Ralph Riviello
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-04-16

5.  Variations in Guidelines for Diagnosis of Child Physical Abuse in High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Flora Blangis; Slimane Allali; Jérémie F Cohen; Nathalie Vabres; Catherine Adamsbaum; Caroline Rey-Salmon; Andreas Werner; Yacine Refes; Pauline Adnot; Christèle Gras-Le Guen; Elise Launay; Martin Chalumeau
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-11-01

6.  Diagnosis of Abusive Head Trauma : Neurosurgical Perspective.

Authors:  Young Ho Kwak
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2022-04-26

Review 7.  A Multispecialty Approach to the Identification and Diagnosis of Nonaccidental Trauma in Children.

Authors:  Muhammad Romail Manan; Sara Rahman; Leah Komer; Hamna Manan; Saadia Iftikhar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-26

8.  Error in Figure Legend.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-09-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.