Management of left ventricular thrombus: a narrative review.

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a serious complication of acute myocardial infarction (MI) and also non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. We performed a narrative literature review, manual-search of reference lists of included articles and relevant reviews. Our literature review indicates that the incidence of LVT following acute MI has decreased, probably due to improvement in patient care as a result of better and earlier reperfusion techniques. Predictors of LVT include anterior MI, involvement of left ventricular (LV) apex (regardless of the coronary territory affected), LV akinesis or dyskinesis, reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF), severe diastolic dysfunction and large infarct size. LVT is associated with increased risk of systemic embolism, stroke, cardiovascular events and death, and there is evidence that anticoagulant therapy for at least 3 months can reduce the risk of these events. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has the highest diagnostic accuracy for LVT, followed by echocardiography with the use of echocardiographic contrast agents (ECAs). Although current guidelines suggest use of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for a minimum of 3 to 6 months, there is growing evidence of the benefits of direct acting oral anticoagulants in treatment of LVT. Embolic events appear to occur even after resolution of LVT suggesting that anticoagulant therapy needs to be considered for a longer period in some cases. Recommendations for the use of triple therapy in the presence of the LVT are mostly based on extrapolation from outcome data in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and MI. We conclude that the presence of LVT is more likely in patients with anterior ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) (involving the apex) and reduced ejection fraction (EF). LVT should be considered a marker of increased long-term thrombotic risk that may persist even after thrombus resolution. Ongoing clinical trials are expected to elucidate the best management strategies for patients with LVT. 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Introduction

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a serious complication of acute myocardial infarction (MI) and also of non-ischemic cardiomyopathies (1). Epidemiologic data suggest the incidence of LVT to be as high as 15% in patients with ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI), up to 25% in patients experiencing an anterior MI (2) and between 2–36% (3,4) in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathies. Regardless of the etiology, however, there is potential for cerebral or systemic embolization from LVT that increases the morbidity and mortality in patients with both ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies.

Given the scarcity of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the optimal treatment regimen, duration and effects in the prevention or treatment of LVT, we performed a narrative literature review in order to examine available information about therapeutic options for patients with this condition. We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases through November 9th 2020, with no restrictions on language. Key words of left ventricular thrombus, apical thrombus, apixaban, warfarin, dabigatran and rivaroxaban were used in these searches. Large prospective studies, metanalysis and systematic reviews were included, although notably, there are few RCTs on the topic. Relevant references in the articles that were identified were then manually-searched. We present the following article in accordance with the Narrative Review reporting checklist (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-7839).

Prevalence and risk factors

Historically, the incidence of LVT following acute MI had been reported to be 20–40%, and even 60% among patients with large anterior MI (5,6). With the wide validation of thrombolytic therapy for MI in the 1980s, the incidence of LVT was reduced to 5–16%, likely due to salvaging myocardium at risk and minimizing wall motion abnormalities (7,8). presents a chronological summary of studies discussing the prevalence of LVT.

Table 1

Clinical studies in diagnosis and prevalence of LVT

Author, year (reference)	Type of study [number of patients]	Conclusion
Ezekowitz, 1982 (9)	Prospective [53]	Compared to surgical or autopsy confirmation, sensitivity of indium-111 platelet scintigraphy for LVT 71%, echocardiography 77%. Specificity of scintigraphy 100%, echocardiography 93%
Gottdiener, 1983 (3)	Retrospective [123]	Prevalence of LVT was 36% in nonischemic cardiomyopathy, systemic emboli in 11%
Bhatnagar, 1991 (8)	Prospective [88]	After STEMI, LVT incidence was 5.5% in those receiving thrombolytics and 18% in control group, likely due to better wall motion score indexes in the treatment group
Pizzetti, 1996 (7)	Retrospective [418]	After thrombolysis treatment, 16% prevalence of LVT, 39% in those with anterior MI
Thanigaraj, 1999 (10)	Retrospective [409]	Use of ECA increase diagnostic yield of LVT in 79% of patients with nondiagnostic non-contrast images
Gottdiener, 2003 (4)	Secondary analysis of RCT [1,343]	Prevalence of LVT was 2.1% in nonischemic cardiomyopathy treated with triple therapy
Srichai, 2006 (5)	Retrospective [361]	29% prevalence of LVT. CMR showed the highest sensitivity and specificity (88% and 99%, respectively) compared with TTE (23% and 96%) and TEE (40% and 96%) for LVT detection
Rehan, 2006 (11)	Prospective [92]	After STEMI treated with PCI and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, incidence of LVT was 4.3%
Kurisu, 2011 (12)	Retrospective [95]	Prevalence of LVT was 5.3% in the setting of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy
Weinsaft, 2008 (13)	Retrospective [784]	Delayed enhancement-CMR detected thrombus in 7% and cine-CMR in 4.7% of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy
Weinsaft, 2009 (14)	Retrospective [121]	Contrast echo nearly doubled sensitivity (61% vs. 33%) and yielded improved accuracy (92% vs. 82%) versus non-contrast echo. Contrast echo and cine-CMR correlated well on the diagnosis of thrombus
Delewi, 2012 (15)	Prospective [200]	CMR had the highest sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 99%, followed by TEE with 40% and 96% respectively, and TTE with 23% and 96%, respectively
Bittencourt, 2012 (16)	Retrospective [31]	In a contrast-enhanced coronary computed tomography angiography dataset, a threshold of 65 Hounsfield units provided a sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 97% for detection of LVT
Mir, 2014 (17)	Retrospective [85]	Prevalence of LVT of 43.1% in STEMI and 5% in NSTEMI
Gianstefani, 2014 (18)	Retrospective [1,059]	After STEMI treated with PCI, prevalence of LVT =4%. Apical akinesis noted in all LVT regardless of the territory infarcted. No difference in mortality in patients treated with warfarin for 3–6 months
Wada, 2014 (19)	Retrospective [392]	Sensitivity and specificity of non-contrast echocardiography for detection of LVT were 88% and 96%, respectively, compared with 100% each with contrast echocardiography
Robinson, 2016 (1)	Meta-analysis [10,076]	After STEMI treated with PCI, summary rate of LVT =2.7%, 9.1% in those with anterior MI
Zeng, 2016 (20)	Retrospective [24]	Iodine densities were significantly lower in the LVT than the LV cavity, whereas blood densities in the two areas did not differ significantly
Mao, 2018 (21)	Retrospective [1,698]	After STEMI treated with PCI, prevalence of LVT =1.6%
Rowin, 2017 (22)	Retrospective [1,940]	In patients with HCM, incidence of apical aneurysm of 4.8% and LVT was present in 19.3% of them, 0.9% of the entire cohort
Maron, 2008 (23)	Retrospective [1,299]	Among patients with HCM, incidence of apical aneurysm of 1.7% and LVT was present in 9.1% of them, 0.2% of the entire cohort
Kitkungvan, 2018 (24)	Retrospective [121]	Prevalence of LVT was 7.4% in patients with chemotherapy-related LV dysfunction
Weber, 2018 (25)	Case series [11]	In patients requiring VA-ECMO, prevalence of LVT was 3.1%
Hamada, 2019 (26)	Case series [5]	All presented patients with HCM had apical aneurysm, only 2 with outflow obstruction
Ding, 2020 (27)	International Registry [1,676]	Prevalence of LVT was 3.3% in the International Takotsubo Registry

CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; ECA, echocardiographic contrast agent; HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; LVT, left ventricular thrombus; MI, myocardial infarction; NSTEMI, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction; RCT, randomized clinical trial; STEMI, ST elevation myocardial infarction; TEE, transesophageal echocardiogram; TTE, transthoracic echocardiogram; VA-ECMO, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

STEMI patients have been reported to be more likely to have LVT compared to non-STEMIs (43.1% vs. 5.0%) (17). Once primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) became the standard of care for STEMI (after the mid 1990’s), the prevalence of LVT seems to be even smaller, with a cumulative incidence of 10% compared to 33% (1,28). In a retrospective, single center study (n=1,059) of STEMI patients treated with primary PCI, LVT was detected in 5% of the subjects. Patients with LVT were more likely to have lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (47% vs. 35%, P<0.01), anterior MI (88% vs. 42%, P<0.01) and apical akinesis (irrespective of the vascular location of the MI). Use of IIb/IIIa inhibitor and symptoms to balloon time were of borderline statistical significance in predicting prevalence of LVT, possibly suggesting an association with larger infarcted territories (18). A smaller (n=92) study in patients who underwent primary PCI plus IIb/IIIa inhibitor use showed a prevalence of 4.3% (11). Similarly, another single center study (n=1,698) in STEMI patients where echocardiographic contrast agents (ECAs) were used in 76% of the cohort, reported a prevalence as low as 1.6% for LVT (21). Echocardiography was performed early after reperfusion, which could have missed later thrombi formation.

Early treatment with PCI is only one of the several ongoing changes in STEMI care compared to historical cohort. Other changes include more effective antiplatelet agents, reduced time to revascularization and newer generations of stents, all of which aim to minimize infarct size. The resultant wall motion abnormalities should then be expected to decrease the risk for LVT (29,30). A metanalysis (1) including 19 articles from 2000 to 2015 (n=10,076) in STEMI patients who underwent PCI showed a LVT incidence rate of 2.7% (95% CI: 1.9–3.5%). In selective analysis of those with anterior MI, the rate of LVT was 9.1% (95% CI: 6.6–11.6%) which decreased to 7.5% in a sensitivity analysis of studies greater than 100 patients (31).

Across studies, described predictors of LVT are anterior MI/left anterior descending territory, involvement of left ventricular (LV) apex regardless of the coronary artery affected, akinesis or dyskinesis, reduced LVEF and large infarct size (32,33). Presence of multivessel coronary artery disease and PCI of culprit lesion only compared to complete revascularization were not predictive of LVT in other reports (34). Moreover, severe diastolic dysfunction (restrictive LV filling pattern) has been associated with increased risk of LVT, measured either by mitral deceleration time <130 ms (35) or increased mitral E/A ratio >2 (36). Although moderate to severe mitral regurgitation after MI has been associated to LVT (37), this relationship was confounded by the extent of wall motion abnormalities and anterior location of the MI and mitral regurgitation was no longer significant after adjusting for these variables. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) volumetric analyses have shown that larger LV volumes and impaired systolic function correlate with higher incidence of LVT (5,38). Furthermore, patients with LVT have been reported to have significantly higher C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, leukocytes and platelet levels than MI patients without LVT (39,40). Rather than playing independent roles, the combination of these risk factors interact with each other to promote LVT. displays this relationship.

Figure 1

Thrombogenic mechanisms in LV thrombosis. LV, left ventricle; MI, myocardial infarction; TIMI, thrombolysis in MI.

Most reported series of LVT focus on ischemic cardiomyopathy, and there is a paucity of studies in patients with non-ischemic etiologies. This is compounded by small sample size of the available studies resulting in poor precision (wide confidence intervals) for incidence and prevalence determinations. Previous studies reported prevalence of LVT up to 36% in the setting of dilated cardiomyopathy (3,9), with an incidence of 11% for embolic events. In the setting of dilated cardiomyopathy, presence of coronary artery disease (that was not considered to be the cause of the cardiac dysfunction) was not associated to the presence of thrombus nor systemic embolism (39). A secondary analysis from the WATCH trial (n=1,343), multicentric prospective randomized trial for the use of warfarin and antiplatelets in patients with chronic dilated cardiomyopathy in sinus rhythm reported a prevalence of LVT of 2.1% (4). Factors associated significantly to LVT were younger age, lower ejection fraction (EF), higher regional wall motion score, higher early diastolic filling velocity, shorter deceleration time, greater LV diastolic dimension and left atrium area.

In a cohort of patients (n=121) with chemotherapy-related severe LV dysfunction (24), defined as LVEF <30%, the prevalence of LVT was 7.4%. Factors associated with presence of LVT were restrictive filling pattern (OR: 18.13, 95% CI: 4.17–78.89) and LVEF <20% (OR: 36.30, 95% CI: 7.35–179.25). Albeit significant, this report posed very wide confidence intervals due to the small number of thrombi detected. Cancer is known to induce a prothrombotic and hypercoagulable state (41,42), and malignancies that have been shown to be particularly prothrombotic such as breast cancer (41), lymphoma (43) and leukemias (44) should increase the level of suspicion in these patients.

There are limited reports (45) and small case series of LVT in patients with stress-induced cardiomyopathy (Takotsubo). The reported incidence of LVT in this patient population is 3–5.3% (12). The largest cohort of patients with this condition, the International Takotsubo Registry, recorded a 3.3% prevalence of LVT and embolism in the acute phase of the disease (27). Stress-induced cardiomyopathy usually presents with a larger LV apical aneurysm than anterior MI, but the lower incidence of LV apical thrombosis could be related to its transient nature and lack of endocardial damage compared to MI. On the other hand, if LVT develops in this setting, the rapid improvement in apical contraction seen in most cases could theoretically increase the risk of embolic events.

Reports of LVT in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are scarce. In a case series (n=5) of patients with LVT and HCM (26), all had apical aneurysm, two had LV outflow obstruction, one atrial fibrillation (AF) and all had resolution of the LVT with anticoagulation [three with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and two with warfarin]. In a large cohort of patients with HCM, reports from 2008 and then 2017 (22,23) suggested incidence of apical aneurysm of 1.7–4.8%, with LVT present in 9.1–19.3% of them (0.2–0.9% of the entire cohort). There is contradictory data about the presence of mid-ventricular obstruction as the leading factor in the progression of LV apical aneurysm formation (46-48) and LVT formation.

LVT has also been occasionally described in amyloidosis (49), hypereosinophilic syndrome (50), and Chagas’ disease (51).

There is also limited data of LVT in patients requiring veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). A case series (n=11), all of them due to ischemic cardiomyopathy complicated with cardiogenic shock, suggested a prevalence of 3.1% of the entire VA-ECMO experience of that center (25). Despite use of inotropic support to promote contractility and anticoagulation in the therapeutic range at the time of diagnosis, the mortality in this report of 100%, highlights the seriousness of LVT in this patient population.

Diagnosis

Routine transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) after primary PCI-treated MI is recommended to assess biventricular function, valvulopathies, exclude post-infarction mechanical complications and evaluate for LVT (52).

Standard TTE is commonly used for screening, but it has low sensitivity for LVT detection, requiring the addition of ECA and/or use of CMR imaging (2). Despite its widespread use and even with the most advanced echocardiographic equipment, TTE can be technically challenging in patients with small intercostal spaces, large body size, chest deformities or lung disease (poor acoustic windows), leading to potential failure to detect subtle LVT findings. Intrinsic limitations of TTE reduce its diagnostic accuracy, particularly in small non-protruding mural thrombi, due to true apex foreshortening, limited near-field resolution or consequent artifacts (near-field clutter) and difficulty discriminating myocardium-thrombi interface.

presents a chronological summary of studies discussing the diagnostic modalities used to detect LVT. Although transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) has well established superiority for detection of atrial thrombi, its role for LVT is more limited. As many as 46% of patients have nonconclusive studies (10,53) for LVT with this semi-invasive procedure. Techniques to improve the diagnostic image quality and improve blood-endocardial surface include harmonic imaging (54) and ECA (54,55). The use of ECA has been reported to be cost effective (55) and increase the echocardiographic sensitivity for LVT detection from 33% to 100%, and the specificity from 82% to 92% (14,19,29).

A single center study (5) in patients with ischemic heart disease (n=361) evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of TTE, TEE and CMR with contrast enhancement for evaluation of LVT which was confirmed by surgical or post-mortem confirmation. The decision to use ECA was at the discretion of the echocardiographer in this survey. Thrombus was found to be apically located in 71% of the cases, associated with aneurysm in 77% of the cases. It has been suggested that the accuracy of TTE is as high as CMR when the request for the search of a thrombus is prespecified (34). Echocardiographic features can predict embolic potential and guide management of LVT as described in subsequent sections (56).

The superiority of CMR (5,57,58) with gadolinium compared to other imaging modalities for detection of LVT is derived to the immediate strong enhancement of LV cavity, allowing detection of abnormal intraventricular structures, as well as the delayed-enhancement technique that allows visualization of LVT (black), commonly adjacent to scarred myocardium (bright or hyper-enhanced). On the other hand, CMR has a higher cost and is not widely available, even in developed countries. CMR had the highest diagnostic accuracy with sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 99%, followed by TEE with 40% and 96% respectively, and TTE with 23% and 96%, respectively (15).

CMR studies (13) have shown that patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy have a fivefold higher prevalence of LVT that patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, even with similar LVEF. LVT was more likely to be found in areas with increased myocardial scarring, a parameter that can only be evaluated with delayed-enhancement CMR. Because of this reason, cine-only CMR could miss small intracavitary and mural thrombus.

There are few studies describing the use of cardiac computerized tomography (CT) for the detection of LVT. Historically, it was considered that CT scanning provides similar accuracy as TTE in detecting LVT, but does so at the expense of increased radiation exposure and requirement for iodine contrast use (59). Recent case reports have suggested that metabolically inert areas seen on positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT), with corresponding homogeneous hypodensity in the LV cavity could suggest organized LVT (60), particularly in patients with limited echocardiographic windows (61). LVT are frequently crescent-shaped filling defects with broad based attachments, although pedunculated appearances have been described (62). Chronic thrombi may develop spotty calcifications, although this finding can also be seen in myxomas (63). CT characteristics of LVT include lower attenuation with a threshold of 65 Hounsfield units, providing a sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 97%, respectively (16). It has been suggested that spectral CT dual-substance separation imaging and derived images of iodine- and blood-based densities are a feasible semiquantitative method to investigate LVT (20).

Although indium-111 platelet scintigraphy has been reported to be comparable to TTE for the diagnosis of LVT (40), it is an older technology with virtually no role in current clinical practice.

Irrespective of the imaging modality utilized, if LV function is found to be depressed, particularly with akinetic or dyskinetic segments, special attention should be placed on evaluating for LVT.

Embolic risk and mortality

The reported risk of embolic events from a LVT post-MI ranges from 6.1% to 86% and seems to be greatest in the first 3 months after MI (5,58,64-66). In one report, the incidence of thromboembolism decreased from 22.3% in pre-PCI studies to 5.5% in post-PCI reports (28), likely due to increased myocardial salvage. Multiple studies have demonstrated that thrombus characteristics associated with systemic embolism include protrusion into the LV cavity (67), mobility independent of myocardium (68-70), patient age >68, thrombus area, length of the thrombi in the lumen, and LVT recurrence (71). On the other hand, thrombus described as laminated and calcified (bright and echo dense structures) are immobile, more likely to be chronic and less likely to embolize, although the risk is not zero and embolization for these laminar thrombi has been reported (72).

There is evidence to suggest that LVT should be considered a marker of increased long-term thrombotic risk that persists even after treatment and documented LVT resolution by imaging (67,73). In a study with pathologic evaluation of the thrombus (3), among patients with documented recent embolic event, 67% had organized thrombus and 33% recent thrombus. Furthermore, up to 40% of embolic events can occur when thrombi are neither protuberant nor mobile (5,71). Evaluation of acute ischemic strokes in patients with LVT (67) showed the median time from LVT diagnosis to cerebrovascular event was 20.5 days. Once again, 5.2% of patients had a stroke even with initial LVT resolution. The majority (76.5%) of strokes were characterized as cardioembolic, followed by 14.7% as small vessel disease and 8.8% large artery atherosclerosis.

LVT is also associated to high rate of cardiovascular events. A contemporary cohort (74) showed that close to 50% of patients had a major cardiovascular event and 20% of patients died during follow up, a figure for mortality that is much higher than reported in STEMI patients without LVT.

Cardioversion

A small retrospective study (n=21) of patients with known LV apical thrombus requiring cardioversion (AF in 38% and ventricular tachycardia in 62%) reported no clinically apparent embolic events after cardioversion, despite only 81% of patients been anticoagulated beforehand (75). Nonetheless, most of the LV thrombi were described as laminated (71%) and none of the patients had mobile thrombi, which theoretically pose the highest risk. A small case series (n=8) of patients undergoing VT ablation (76) with documented LVT (all mural and laminated) showed only one ischemic stroke on post-procedure day 9, in a patient with confirmed left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus by TEE. All the patients underwent multiple intraprocedural cardioversion, suggestive the relative safety of cardioversion in the setting of laminated LVT.

Prevention

More effective revascularization strategies may reduce LVT formation in patients experiencing a MI, but LVT remains as a common complication of STEMI in the modern era. Along with resulting ischemic cardiomyopathy, LVT might be one of the predominant features affecting management and prognosis post PCI (32). Interestingly, thrombolysis in MI (TIMI) flow pre-PCI has been associated with LVT, but not TIMI flow post-PCI (18). presents a chronological summary of studies involving prophylaxis and treatment of LVT.

Table 2

Clinical studies in prevention and treatment of LVT

Author, year (reference)	Type of study [number of patients]	Conclusion
Arvan, 1987 (77)	RCT [30]	No difference in LVT incidence after acute anterior MI with the use of heparin infusion, partial thromboplastin time >60 seconds
Tavazzi, 1989 (78)	RCT [711]	After acute anterior MI, 12,500 U of subcutaneous heparin reduced LVT incidence and mortality
Turpie, 1989 (79)	RCT [183]	In patients with acute anterior MI subcutaneous heparin at a dose of 12,500 U BID was more effective preventing LVT than 5,000 units BID
Kouvaras, 1990 (80)	Prospective [60]	High-dose aspirin was noninferior to warfarin for LVT resolution after 3 months
Kontny, 1993 (81)	Prospective [229]	High-dose heparin prevented LVT irrespective of warfarin therapy after acute anterior MI. Warfarin therapy without heparin was associated with higher rates of LVT
Kontny, 1997 (82)	RCT [517]	Dalteparin 150 IU/kg BID significantly reduces LVT after acute anterior MI (RR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.43–0.92, P=0.02) but is associated with increased hemorrhagic risk.
Meurin, 2005 (83)	Prospective [19]	Enoxaparin BID followed by fluindione was as effective as unfractionated heparin at 3 weeks
Le May, 2015 (84)	Retrospective [460]	In patients with apical akinesis or dyskinesis, prophylactic use of warfarin increases net adverse events (all-cause mortality, strokes, reinfarction and major bleeding)
White, 2015 (85)	RCT [60]	Enoxaparin for 30 days post MI shortened hospitalization and lowered cost of care compared to warfarin, with no statistical difference among the groups of LVT at 3 months
Smetana, 2017 (86)	Case series [10]	Patients with LVT treated with rivaroxaban and apixaban showed complete thrombus resolution in 8 patients, with only one bleeding event
Robinson, 2018 (87)	Retrospective [98]	DOAC-treated patients (mostly apixaban) had similar SSE-free survival
Maniwa, 2018 (65)	Retrospective [2,301]	In patients with LVT treated with VKA, the time in therapeutic range >50% was associated with lower embolic events without increasing bleeding events
Altýntaþ, 2019 (88)	Retrospective [641]	After STEMI, ticagrelor use had lower incidence of LVT than clopidogrel, OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.28–0.96, P=0.039
Daher, 2020 (89)	Retrospective [59]	Similar efficacy between DOAC and VKA agents in patients with LVT (70.6% vs. 71.5%)
Lattuca, 2020 (74)	Retrospective [159]	Anticoagulation therapy >3 months was independently associated with less MACE (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.20–0.88; P=0.021). Reduced risk of mortality was observed among patients with total LVT regression (15.2% vs. 25.0%; HR: 0.48; P=0.039), with higher bleeding rates
Robinson, 2020 (73)	Retrospective [514]	Anticoagulation with DOAC vs. warfarin had higher rates of SSE (adjusted HR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.28–5.43, P=0.01)
Guddeti, 2020 (90)	Retrospective [99]	Resolution of LVT, rates of stroke and bleeding were not statistically different between VKA and DOAC
Iqbal, 2020 (91)	Retrospective [84]	No statistically significant differences between VKA and DOAC in rates of LVT resolution (76% vs. 65%), SSE (2% vs. 0%), or clinically significant bleeding (10% vs. 0%)
Ali, 2020 (92)	Retrospective [110]	Treatment with DOACs was associated with lower 1-year risk of stroke (12% vs. 6%, P=0.33), although no difference found in ischemic stroke or thrombus resolution)

BID, every 12 hours; DOAC, direct oral anticoagulant; LVT, left ventricular thrombus; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular event; MI, myocardial infarction; NSTEMI, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction; RCT, randomized clinical trial; SSE, stroke or systemic embolism; STEMI, ST elevation myocardial infarction; VKA, vitamin K antagonist.

In the thrombolytic era, a randomized trial (82) of dalteparin 150 IU/kg every 12 hours for 9 days, significantly reduced LVT formation in patients with anterior MI, although with increased risk of hemorrhagic complications (both major and minor). The short in-hospital data in this report limits the capacity to extrapolate its effectiveness as an outpatient regimen. Similar findings were reported with 12,500 U of subcutaneous heparin (78) until discharge, but contradictory results were reported as well in a small (n=30) RCT (77). A subsequent randomized trial (79) compared subcutaneous heparin high dose (12,500 U twice a day) with low doses (5,000 units twice a day) for 10 days after anterior MI, showing that the high dose was more effective without incremental bleeding risk.

With current standard of care of PCI and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after MI, small pilot randomized trial (n=60) in patients with anterior MI with Q waves and EF ≤40% showed that preventive full therapeutic dose of enoxaparin (1 mg/kg twice a day, maximum dose 100 mg) for 30 days (85) had similar bleeding and thromboembolic events compared to anticoagulation with warfarin. More patients had probable mural thrombus at 3.5 months with enoxaparin, albeit the difference was not statistically significant.

A retrospective cohort (84) of 460 patients with apical akinesis or dyskinesis after STEMI on TTE showed that patients who received DAPT plus warfarin therapy experienced a net increase in adverse clinical events (all-cause mortality, strokes, reinfarction and major bleeding) at 180 days. A single center retrospective study (88), suggested that ticagrelor based DAPT after anterior STEMI (n=641) was associated with lower incidence of LVT when compared to clopidogrel (OR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.29–0.86).

Current guidelines (52,93) suggest considering short courses (3 months) of anticoagulation in patients with large anterior wall MI, or anterior-apical akinesis (85) as a class IIb, level of evidence (LOE) C recommendation.

Treatment

Vitamin K antagonist (VKA)

European and United State guidelines recommend as a class IIa, LOE C, treatment of LVT with VKAs for a minimum of 3 to 6 months, with duration individualized to bleeding risk (52,94) with a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.5 (range, 2–3). Repeat imaging is suggested at the end of the treatment period to evaluate resolution of LVT as a class IIa, LOE C recommendation (52).

Lattuca et al., observed a significant decrease in risk of major cardiovascular events with anticoagulation for more than 3 months (48% decrease) and LVEF ≥35% (54% decrease).

The prothrombotic effect of VKA during the start of therapy warrants their coadministration with parenteral anticoagulation initially (81). A small prospective study (n=26) showed that enoxaparin 100 IU/kg twice a day, followed by fluindione treatment decreased thrombus size and resulted in resolution of thrombi in 73% of the patients, suggesting that this therapy may be as effective as unfractionated heparin (83) at 3 weeks.

Resolution of LVT has been reported with VKA (32), usually in addition to DAPT. In a small trial (n=60), patients with LVT were randomized to aspirin 650 mg daily, warfarin or placebo, finding that high-dose aspirin was noninferior to warfarin for LVT resolution after 3 months (80). Maniwa et al. showed that after 5.4 years of anticoagulation (median duration 34 months) patients with inadequate anticoagulation (time in therapeutic range <50%) were more likely to develop systemic embolism, without difference in major bleeding events. Of interest, in this report the target INR range in this cohort was 1.6–2.6, according to the Japanese guideline of therapy for AF for elderly population (95).

If LVT recurs after resolution, longer-term anticoagulation could be considered (28). The recurrence rate after 6 months of anticoagulation has been reported as high as 18.5% (96). Moreover, after treatment with VKA, reduced mortality was observed in patients with total LVT regression whereas an increased major bleeding risk was observed among patients with persistent LVT (74).

Direct oral anticoagulants

DOACs are attractive alternatives for warfarin because of their potential efficacy and safety even though there is no randomized controlled trial that proves the effect of DOACs in LVT (97). The growing enthusiasm about DOACs is based on their ease of administration, lack of requirement for INR monitoring or dietary restrictions and overall improvement in quality of life (98).

The original indication for developing DOACs was anticoagulation for AF, a condition with pathophysiologic and therapeutic differences compared to LVT. In AF, anticoagulation used is meant to prevent thrombus formation in the LAA in addition to promote dissolution of existing thrombi. The primary thrombogenic mechanism in AF is stasis, associated with low LAA emptying velocities. In LVT, the use of anticoagulation is focused on dissolution of existing thrombi. In this setting, thrombogenic mechanisms include stasis, hypercoagulability and endocardial changes (33) as depicted in . These differences in pathophysiology could explain the differences in response to anticoagulation, and choice of the optimal agent. In patients with existing LAA thrombi, treatment with rivaroxaban resolved 41.5% of thrombus (99), although this report lacked warfarin control group.

Multiple case reports, case series (86,100,101) and small single center retrospective studies (n<140) have reported similar efficacy between DOAC and VKA (87,89,90,102-104) in LVT, although all of them had very few embolic events with short follow up. Anecdotally, in patients with persistent LVT after DOAC therapy, resolution of the LVT was seen in all patients after switching to VKA, with a higher INR goal of 3–4 (87). Furthermore, regarding safety, bleeding events and strokes comparable between the two groups (90). A case series of 10 patients with LVT treated with rivaroxaban and apixaban showed complete thrombus resolution in 8 patients, with only one bleeding event (86).

On the other hand, a larger multicenter retrospective cohort study (n=514), showed that DOAC treatment (43.9% of total cohort, distributed as 76.2% apixaban, 24.9% rivaroxaban, 4.9% dabigatran) had an increased risk of stroke or systemic embolism at a median of 351 days of follow up (73). This finding was robust to sensitivity analysis including limiting to those with effective anticoagulation for only 3 months and restricting to 1 year of follow up. Authors did not evaluate bleeding complications in the groups, a theoretical advantage for DOACs. A more recent single center study (n=110) of patients with LVT showed a lower 1-year risk of any stroke with DOACs as compared to warfarin (12% vs. 6%, P=0.33), although no statistical difference was found in ischemic stroke or rate of thrombus resolution between warfarin and DOACs (92).

In another contemporary cohort (n=159), median duration of anticoagulation therapy was 508 days, 35% of patients were on anticoagulation and DAPT (74). After multivariate adjustment, factors associated with total LVT regression were non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (HR: 2.74; 95% CI: 1.43 to 5.26; P<0.01) and a smaller baseline thrombus area (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.96; P=0.03). Recurrent LVT formation or increased size was associated with poor treatment adherence, chronic renal failure or prothrombotic conditions such as active cancer, inflammatory or hematological diseases. Although theoretically, LVT regression could be partially explained by thrombus embolization, this study did not find a significant difference in embolic complications between patients with or without LVT regression. Similar cohorts have reported that DOACs are likely to be as effective and safe as VKA (90), including no difference in resolution of stroke, other embolism, bleeding, rehospitalization and all-cause mortality.

As an alternative to VKA therapy for the prevention of recurrent stroke, the 2014 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines (105) introduced a new recommendation to consider treatment for 3 months with a low-molecular weight heparin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack in the setting of acute MI associated with LVT formation or anterior or apical wall-motion abnormalities with a LVEF <40% who are intolerant to VKA therapy because of non-hemorrhagic adverse events (class IIb; LOE C).

Surgical thrombectomy

Surgical removal of the LVT is an option for patients with high embolic risk undergoing other open-heart surgery or at the time of transition from peripheral to central VA-ECMO configuration (106). The high morbidity and mortality of this approach outweigh the benefits of performing surgery solely for the indication of LVT (51).

Triple therapy

As many patients with LVT have an indication for DAPT, concern arises about increase bleeding risk with the addition of anticoagulation. Most studies comparing outcomes between triple therapy and DAPT typically included patients with different indications for anticoagulation, most commonly AF. Multiple studies have shown increase in bleeding events with prolonged triple antithrombotic therapy (107-109), although short them (<1 month) did not find increase in bleeding complications (110).

In patients with STEMI-related LVT, a single center study (n=616) with a mean duration of triple therapy of 6.4 months reported a 2.5% risk of cardioembolic event and 18.5% risk of bleeding event (111).

Studies in the use of DOACs after MI, such as the Prevention of Bleeding in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing PCI (PIONEER-AF PCI) (112), Dual Antithrombotic Therapy with Dabigatran after PCI in Atrial Fibrillation (REDUAL-PCI) (113) or Antithrombotic Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndrome or PCI in Atrial Fibrillation (AUGUSTUS) (114), that evaluated different combinations of DOAC and antiplatelet agents after PCI all in the setting of AF, suggest safety of the triple therapy. On the other hand, as explained above, the different pathophysiology of AF-related thrombosis contrasted to LVT could limit the extrapolation of these type of studies into LVT treatment.

Future directions

There is an important unmet need for adequately powered RCTs to address the many questions in the management of LVT. The evidence for recommendations for optimal anticoagulation regimens, combination with antiplatelets in the setting of MI, length of therapy, treatment in those with persistent LVT (chronic, “endotheliazed” thrombus), triple therapy in the setting of LVT and use of DOACs is still limited and in many cases anecdotal.

The information from ongoing clinical trials should provide information that will be pivotal for the management of LVT. In one trial (NCT01556659) patients will be randomized to VKA plus DAPT or DAPT alone in patients with PCI-treated STEMI and confirmed LVT. The EARLYmyo-LVT (NCT03786757) will evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of low dose rivaroxaban (2.5 mg BID for 24 weeks) in the prevention of post-STEMI LVT. The EARLY-MYO-LVT (NCT03764241) will be a prospective, multi-center and randomized trial designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban (15 mg daily) versus warfarin (goal INR: 2–2.5) in the treatment of post-STEMI LVT, on a background of DAPT (aspirin and clopidogrel) for 3–6 months (115).

Summary

LVT is more prevalent in patients with anterior STEMI (involving the apex) and reduced EF. LVT is associated with higher risk of cardiovascular events and death, and evidence suggests anticoagulation therapy for at least 3 months reduces this risk. LVT should be considered a marker of increased long-term thrombotic risk that may persist even after thrombus resolution. Ongoing clinical trials are expected to elucidate the best management strategies for patients with LVT.

The article’s supplementary files as